I will take his pics on fantasy draft more seriously now

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez
carey wrote:Years90Suns wrote:Damkac wrote:Utah said that they would match any offer for Hayward. Don't remember if Houston said anything like that but most people was suprised they didn't match Parson. Dallas knew that Rockets might match but they made an offer anyway.
If Bledsoe is worth max contract he would received it.
Supposedly, the Rockets did not match Parson's offer based on a demand by DH's agent, as Parsons and DH share the agent and this agent made Howard's arrival to the Rockets possible.
Not correct. They let him BECOME a UFA a year before they had to based on the agreement. The not matching was their own decision.
batsmasher wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA/status/514893892614098944[/tweet]
G35 wrote:He may run a great offense but I wouldn't choose him over Amare to start a team.
1UPZ wrote:5 year 70 million is not bad..
its equivalent to 4 years 56 million... Which MOST here are "OK" with...
Hopefully its team option at 5th.
Or...
Since its not max.... will a trade be happening next?
LukasBMW wrote:batsmasher wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA/status/514893892614098944[/tweet]
F word
F word
F word
Would rather have signed him for 64/4 @ $16 million per year.
If his knees sh it the bead in year two, we are stuck with him for 3 more years.
I hope we learn from Amare and trade him in year 3 of the contract when his trade value is peaking rather then wait until he is a free agent again and either sign him to a 5/120 max deal or lose him for nothing.
G35 wrote:He may run a great offense but I wouldn't choose him over Amare to start a team.
batsmasher wrote:5/$70mill
IT'S OVER PEOPLE.... OVER!!
[tweet]https://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA/status/514893545384460289[/tweet]
LukasBMW wrote:batsmasher wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA/status/514893892614098944[/tweet]
F word
F word
F word
Would rather have signed him for 64/4 @ $16 million per year.
If his knees sh it the bead in year two, we are stuck with him for 3 more years.
I hope we learn from Amare and trade him in year 3 of the contract when his trade value is peaking rather then wait until he is a free agent again and either sign him to a 5/120 max deal or lose him for nothing.
bwgood77 wrote:Yeah, 14 a year which is where many thought it would end up. And we get him locked up for the extra year. Sounds good to me.
bwgood77 wrote:1UPZ wrote:5 year 70 million is not bad..
its equivalent to 4 years 56 million... Which MOST here are "OK" with...
Hopefully its team option at 5th.
Or...
Since its not max.... will a trade be happening next?
Nah, couldn't happen until mid season anyway.
batsmasher wrote:5/$70mill
IT'S OVER PEOPLE.... OVER!!
[tweet]https://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA/status/514893545384460289[/tweet]