matt131 wrote:BobbieL wrote:bwgood77 wrote:
Ishbia caved on Bridges. Then after that they wanted to add Crowder where we were going to trade elsewhere and Ishbia then said forget it, after he had just caved on Bridges. Later he thought about it at dinner and told Jones to call back and take it.
Jones would not have made the deal even with just Bridges and no Crowder in. Though it then would have been Crowder and Saric instead of salaries probably, but the Nets would have never done it without Bridges.
This was an owner who finally is like the kid in the candy story spending all his money wanting to make an impression.
Jones was smart to not include Bridges. Ishbia overruled him - and thats why I think it was ego or emotion. And if Windhorst is right, he made the decision at dinner talking to his friends. Again, emotional - "hey lets do this" and they all take a shot and high five each other.
This decision was Sarver-esque to me when you include Mikal. Windhorst said the Nets never budged. The Suns should have waited them out if Durant was really only going to the Suns
While I don't disagree with your analysis, Durant telling the Nets that if they couldn't find the right deal for him that he would play with the new guys and get excited about it is what really killed this for us. It needed to be "Suns or I'm sitting out." Nets had no pressure whatsoever to move him. They asked for all that they wanted and got it. Yes, we could have waited until the offseason, but at that point who knows what happens. What if the Nets are super good and make it to the ECF? Does Durant still want to leave? What if another team throws a better deal together and Durant eventually says "okay, i'll play for them."? Nets had no pressure and the Suns needed to do this now if they wanted the assurance of actually landing him. Yes, it's unfortunate that the decision process seemed a bit rash or like he made it with friends, but Jones was there when they decided to include Bridges.
If Bridges and Cam and the picks were non-negotiables, I wonder how many people here would have stopped the deal just because we thought we'd fill that fifth starter spot with the Crowder trade and didn't want to send him to the Nets? I think maybe I would have called the Nets back and said "Look, we agreed to your SUPER high demand without any negotiation or lowering of cost. You need to relent on Crowder." I would have still gone through with it had they said no, but you had to at least try.
I think when it comes to BobbieL and I, we would have not one it even without Crowder. To me, if we don't win a championship it's a complete bust. If we do win 1 championship, to me, it will depend on what happens over the next 7-10 years for me to decide if that 1 championship was worth all that we gave up. I know I am in a very small minority but I'm not a ringz/championship or bust guy. I enjoy watching teams I like, like the 88-95 teams and the SSOL Suns, largely organically grown...we did add Barkley at the tail end of our first team, and got back Nash who we had drafted. All we really have left now is Booker and Ayton. I guess you can add TJ but he's only likely here for this year.

















