ImageImageImage

Trade Discussion

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez

Bogyo
Analyst
Posts: 3,357
And1: 2,478
Joined: Jul 29, 2013

Re: Trade Discussion 

Post#1461 » by Bogyo » Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:33 am

Ryu wrote:I hope Sabonis is available with the Wizz pick. That kid certainly knows how to play basketball.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YRQa8630mkI[/youtube]


Hopefully he takes it easier on the vodka than his dad. :lol:
But he looks like a legit replacement for Kieff. Less offense, more rebounding, and a better head on his shoulders. Not a sexy pick, but a good one, nevertheless.
# waiting for the next chapter
Skillmatic
Freshman
Posts: 86
And1: 30
Joined: Feb 22, 2013

Re: Trade Discussion 

Post#1462 » by Skillmatic » Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:35 am

Oh i really forgot Perry Jones III. I was high on him in the past. But there is a reason that he is not on an NBA roster. But maybe we can give him a chance. We have nothing to lose. And he is still young
Bogyo
Analyst
Posts: 3,357
And1: 2,478
Joined: Jul 29, 2013

Re: Trade Discussion 

Post#1463 » by Bogyo » Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:48 am

Rayray, if you are around and can shed some light on what we were trying to do after the Kieff deal it would be appreciated.

One other thing about holding out for a young player as well- my gut feeling is that McD was showing this trade to the Raptors, and trying to get the NYK pick with some other moving parts (Tucker, Telly, CLE pick, whatever). Or at least that's what would make sense to me. The Raptors did not want to trade that much and distrupt their chemistry, which I can understand in some ways (they might be an Irving injury away from the Finals!), but in the long run I think they'll regret not taking this risk. We'll see in a cpl months I guess.
# waiting for the next chapter
Damkac
Analyst
Posts: 3,143
And1: 3,062
Joined: Apr 18, 2011
Location: Poland

Re: Trade Discussion 

Post#1464 » by Damkac » Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:22 am

Spoiler:
blacksun wrote:McD with regards to acquiring young players and draft picks:

Yeah i think its the most sustainable way to build a team long term. If you look at franchises that have drafted well and developed well, they're usually consistently good over time. And it doesn't happen overnight, there’s a development process. A lot of the guys in the draft are as young as 19 years old so it takes time for them to mature and grow. But i think some of the most exciting things on our end and for the fans is to see a guy like Devin Booker at the beginning of his career…If you draft well every year, then you’ll have a consistently good team in time and it will be sustainable for a long time.


Im conjecturing that this is a guy who from the very beginning, wanted to rebuild through the draft. It supports the thinking that it was Sarver who decided to jump the gun and conbuild as opposed to tank when the 2013-2014 season went better than expected. The following decisions that followed were signing IT, trading for BK, trading for Brendan Wright, signing Chandler and going hard for Aldridge. Now Sarver realizes theres no way were getting into the playoffs this year so he relents and greenlights the youth movement. McD can start doing what he has always wanted to do two years ago. Its not all bad though, because getting players like Warren and Booker for the '14 and '15 draft is probably better than who we have gotten had we tanked.

It was pretty clear to me that McD wanted to rebuild by draft all the time. He traded almost all the vets in his first year but that team overarchieved and Sarver wanted playoffs. I really respect McD for that he was doing what's good for the team long term even though it may cost him his job. I'm sure $arver was saying the word "playoffs" at least ten times in every conversation with him. I said before that someone else as gm might turn this team into Nets of the west.

Happy with the pick but I think that if we would trade Kieff right after trading Marcus the return wouldn't be worse.
I'm curious why this team loves Tucker so much. Maybe he really is great leader in the locker room?

Spoiler:
AtheJ415 wrote:
Qwigglez wrote:
Frank Lee wrote:To get DMo, it would have cost McDraft the Wash pick. We all know how he gets excited by picks. Don't forget his very first deal, if memory doesn't fail me, was GrownAssMan for wash's pick, which ended up #14 ? This time, it feels much better.

It was the 18th pick. We took Ennis. I believe we had the 14th and took Warren.


I mean, I like DMo plenty, but he's coming off a back injury and will get PAID this summer under the crazy cap, so it's not the end of the world to get a pick. And honestly, while many hate this draft, I think some guys I like will be available there.

If we would trade for DMo I would fear that we would have to give him insane money to keep him and he may be injury prone. I prefer the pick. McD may use it to either take a gamble on boom-or-bust prospect or get rotational player on cheap long term deal.
Bogyo
Analyst
Posts: 3,357
And1: 2,478
Joined: Jul 29, 2013

Re: Trade Discussion 

Post#1465 » by Bogyo » Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:26 am

Wow, I just realized that Boston has 5 (yes, you read that right FIVE!) second round picks this year, as well as 3 first rounders. They have 15 players under contract, andonly have 4 expiring contracts in Lee, Sullinger, Zeller and Turner, and I'm pretty sure they would like to resign (and trade?) at least 2 of Sully, Zeller and Turner. It will be a busy draft day for sure, and they might just get Love after all is said and done - especially if CLE dissapoints in the playoffs or in the finals which is likely.

I hope we get in on the action, although we are almost at the "too much youth" point. Maybe Knight and our latter picks for a younger star? I just have no idea at the moment who that would be.
# waiting for the next chapter
Mulhollanddrive
RealGM
Posts: 12,555
And1: 8,337
Joined: Jan 19, 2013

Re: Trade Discussion 

Post#1466 » by Mulhollanddrive » Fri Feb 19, 2016 12:13 pm

Simmons and Zhou Qi.

I think these 2 have become underrated, and everyone else overrated.
User avatar
MathiasPW
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,688
And1: 2,807
Joined: Jan 02, 2010
Location: Brazil
   

Re: RE: Re: Trade Discussion 

Post#1467 » by MathiasPW » Fri Feb 19, 2016 12:31 pm

Mulhollanddrive wrote:Simmons and Zhou Qi.

I think these 2 have become underrated, and everyone else overrated.

Not sure you can call a #1 or #2 pick underrated, but I get what you mean. He lost some of his charm recently.
Image
Mulhollanddrive
RealGM
Posts: 12,555
And1: 8,337
Joined: Jan 19, 2013

Re: Trade Discussion 

Post#1468 » by Mulhollanddrive » Fri Feb 19, 2016 12:44 pm

I like elite potential guys, I wasn't a fan of Kaminsky last year when the board was going nuts over him.

Likewise this year it might be Rabb or Sabonis, but I'd take Zhou Qi.
carey
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,192
And1: 1,941
Joined: Feb 12, 2009
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
     

Re: Trade Discussion 

Post#1469 » by carey » Fri Feb 19, 2016 12:48 pm

Bogyo wrote:Wow, I just realized that Boston has 5 (yes, you read that right FIVE!) second round picks this year, as well as 3 first rounders. They have 15 players under contract, andonly have 4 expiring contracts in Lee, Sullinger, Zeller and Turner, and I'm pretty sure they would like to resign (and trade?) at least 2 of Sully, Zeller and Turner. It will be a busy draft day for sure, and they might just get Love after all is said and done - especially if CLE dissapoints in the playoffs or in the finals which is likely.

I hope we get in on the action, although we are almost at the "too much youth" point. Maybe Knight and our latter picks for a younger star? I just have no idea at the moment who that would be.


I don't understand what Boston has to really offer Cleveland. They traded a #1 overall selection for Love, do you think they are going to turn around 2 seasons later and trade Love for a draft pick? They need guys that can help them win right now. I don't know who that is outside of someone like Kawhi Leonard (an elite perimeter defender) who clearly isn't available.
User avatar
bigfoot
Suns Forum Anti-Tank Commander
Posts: 9,955
And1: 6,552
Joined: Sep 16, 2010
 

Re: Trade Discussion 

Post#1470 » by bigfoot » Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:06 pm

This morning I woke up smiling !!! :D :D :D
User avatar
lilfishi22
Forum Mod - Suns
Forum Mod - Suns
Posts: 36,280
And1: 24,627
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Location: Australia

Re: Trade Discussion 

Post#1471 » by lilfishi22 » Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:12 pm

Finally caught up on the last 15 or so pages. All I can say is: SEEYA!

That Wiz pick is about as good as we're likely to get in terms of a 1st rounder. Even though this draft isn't particularly strong (we seem to draft high during weak drafts...See Len) I think we could net ourselves another solid guy based on McD's track record.
BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 15,353
And1: 8,997
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: Trade Discussion 

Post#1472 » by BobbieL » Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:17 pm

Blackification wrote:I shake my head when the media people just say that the suns did the morris brother dirty by signing them and trading marcus. Yea lets act like Marcus didn't yell at his coach, both of them didnt **** on the fans while getting technicals that possibly cost us games last season, and that they dont have **** felony charges.


Agreed - the Morri didn't have to sign the $52m - decide how you want it split up. They lowballed themselves to do that FOE and play together. That's on them. than to go out, get T'd up, yell at coaches, felony charges, blah blah blah - they brought this on themselves.

As for the team and structure - first and foremost, Knight and Bledsoe need to stay healthy. Bledsoe with Booker and Knight as your third guard (unless one of them is traded) - is something that is do-able. Its that 4 spot that needs to be filled. Sadly, Kieff didn't want to fill it
Fo-Real
General Manager
Posts: 9,800
And1: 5,503
Joined: Mar 21, 2009
     

Re: Trade Discussion 

Post#1473 » by Fo-Real » Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:35 pm

Kerrsed wrote:Image



Don't forget MAR $WAG BROOKS!!!!
Mulhollanddrive
RealGM
Posts: 12,555
And1: 8,337
Joined: Jan 19, 2013

Re: Trade Discussion 

Post#1474 » by Mulhollanddrive » Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:53 pm

McDonough's interview was interesting, says drafting youth has proven to be the best way to achieve sustained success.

Things do seem to change depending on whether playoffs are in the picture though, for the past 6 months I hear him on the radio saying we want to contend ASAP, and need more experience, play harder etc...

So I wonder what our strategy will be when things reset in the off-season.
jcsunsfan
Head Coach
Posts: 6,477
And1: 4,829
Joined: Dec 20, 2006
     

Re: Trade Discussion 

Post#1475 » by jcsunsfan » Fri Feb 19, 2016 3:10 pm

Mulhollanddrive wrote:McDonough's interview was interesting, says drafting youth has proven to be the best way to achieve sustained success.

Things do seem to change depending on whether playoffs are in the picture though, for the past 6 months I hear him on the radio saying we want to contend ASAP, and need more experience, play harder etc...

So I wonder what our strategy will be when things reset in the off-season.


It might be that Sarver has relented about retooling quickly and given McD the green light to take the longer road.
User avatar
Djedefre
Senior
Posts: 729
And1: 939
Joined: May 31, 2014
 

Re: Trade Discussion 

Post#1476 » by Djedefre » Fri Feb 19, 2016 3:13 pm

From my point of view, it's pretty clear - do everything you can to grab that #2 spot before the very draft night, and if it fails, then try even harder to achieve that next year where we should have more options to choose from (Jackson, Giles, Tatum...).
Bogyo
Analyst
Posts: 3,357
And1: 2,478
Joined: Jul 29, 2013

Re: Trade Discussion 

Post#1477 » by Bogyo » Fri Feb 19, 2016 3:21 pm

carey wrote:
Bogyo wrote:Wow, I just realized that Boston has 5 (yes, you read that right FIVE!) second round picks this year, as well as 3 first rounders. They have 15 players under contract, andonly have 4 expiring contracts in Lee, Sullinger, Zeller and Turner, and I'm pretty sure they would like to resign (and trade?) at least 2 of Sully, Zeller and Turner. It will be a busy draft day for sure, and they might just get Love after all is said and done - especially if CLE dissapoints in the playoffs or in the finals which is likely.

I hope we get in on the action, although we are almost at the "too much youth" point. Maybe Knight and our latter picks for a younger star? I just have no idea at the moment who that would be.


I don't understand what Boston has to really offer Cleveland. They traded a #1 overall selection for Love, do you think they are going to turn around 2 seasons later and trade Love for a draft pick? They need guys that can help them win right now. I don't know who that is outside of someone like Kawhi Leonard (an elite perimeter defender) who clearly isn't available.


Well I'm not 100% sure about that as well, I just know that they are waaaaay over any and every cap/luxury tax line, while they will not beat the Warriors or Spurs (barring injuries). Now they got Frye, who can pretty much do the same as Love, if they use him the same way (yes, they don't utilize Love well enough, he is not a good fit on that team imo), only 16 mio cheaper. So if they can get the 3rd, the 19th and the 31st pick of this draft, plus Crowder and Olynyk (or whatever 1-2 players they need) they might do it I think. They would be pretty much the same, with a better bench, some young guys, and would save 10-30 mio in taxes.

Its basically the same idea why some of our posters thought that CLE would be better giving us Love for Morris, Tucker and Knight, only this way they save some money as well, and get a good prospect as well. I was torn on that, as I don't think that we need a Love type player for this team, but I could see why Cleveland would do it.
# waiting for the next chapter
jcsunsfan
Head Coach
Posts: 6,477
And1: 4,829
Joined: Dec 20, 2006
     

Re: Trade Discussion 

Post#1478 » by jcsunsfan » Fri Feb 19, 2016 3:30 pm

Ryu wrote:I hope Sabonis is available with the Wizz pick. That kid certainly knows how to play basketball.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YRQa8630mkI[/youtube]


I would use the Cleveland pick to move up a few spots to get him, if I had to. He has the fire, he has the strength, he has the skills, he has the defense.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,307
And1: 61,068
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Discussion 

Post#1479 » by bwgood77 » Fri Feb 19, 2016 3:43 pm

Mulhollanddrive wrote:McDonough's interview was interesting, says drafting youth has proven to be the best way to achieve sustained success.

Things do seem to change depending on whether playoffs are in the picture though, for the past 6 months I hear him on the radio saying we want to contend ASAP, and need more experience, play harder etc...

So I wonder what our strategy will be when things reset in the off-season.


Yeah, I was just thinking when he said the best way to sustain success is to build through the draft, that I wish the interviewer would have said "then why did you trade the top 3 protected Lakers pick for a pg you could have maybe gotten in FA, especially when you already had a PG?"
User avatar
MathiasPW
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,688
And1: 2,807
Joined: Jan 02, 2010
Location: Brazil
   

Re: Trade Discussion 

Post#1480 » by MathiasPW » Fri Feb 19, 2016 3:45 pm

Image

Return to Phoenix Suns