Kerrsed wrote:With trade deadline approaching, Mavs excused Williams and Bogut from practice
Williams and Bogut for Favors and protected 1st?
Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez
Kerrsed wrote:With trade deadline approaching, Mavs excused Williams and Bogut from practice
sunskerr wrote:Come on Santa. We've been good Suns fans and we deserve an early Christmas.
Kerrsed wrote:As for Tucker, one idea i had, and who knows how down they will be, but i think that Tucker/Chandler would do great for the Spurs.
Tucker/Chandler for Ginobilli (Buyout)/ Murray/2017 1st (or even a future 1st).
Ginobilli really isnt doing much with the Spurs and really isnt playing that many minutes. At 39 years old, i feel like they could get more out of Tucker and Chandler (specially in the playoffs) than they will get from Ginobilli. He is on an expiring contract, and we can just buy him out and let him retire a few months early.
Unfortunately its against the NBA rules for us to trade for him, buy him out, then he re-sign to the Spurs for cheap cheap (Since he would already have got paid in full from the buyout). So i doubt the Spurs would do it, as more of a respect thing rather than a "It doesnt make basketball sense" thing.
Qwigglez wrote:sunskerr wrote:Come on Santa. We've been good Suns fans and we deserve an early Christmas.
What would be a good Christmas for the Suns in your opinion?
Qwigglez wrote:Kerrsed wrote:As for Tucker, one idea i had, and who knows how down they will be, but i think that Tucker/Chandler would do great for the Spurs.
Tucker/Chandler for Ginobilli (Buyout)/ Murray/2017 1st (or even a future 1st).
Ginobilli really isnt doing much with the Spurs and really isnt playing that many minutes. At 39 years old, i feel like they could get more out of Tucker and Chandler (specially in the playoffs) than they will get from Ginobilli. He is on an expiring contract, and we can just buy him out and let him retire a few months early.
Unfortunately its against the NBA rules for us to trade for him, buy him out, then he re-sign to the Spurs for cheap cheap (Since he would already have got paid in full from the buyout). So i doubt the Spurs would do it, as more of a respect thing rather than a "It doesnt make basketball sense" thing.
No way I help those jerk-offs. LMA really wanted to play with Chandler, and he could have... in Phoenix. I'm not gifting them Chandler and Tucker so they can win another championship and we end up with Murray when there are plenty of good PG's in the upcoming draft. Eff those guys, oh and I wouldn't buyout Ginobli either if we did this sort of deal. In fact, I'd sit Booker more and have Ginobli play all 48 minutes. Have him play center too so he can flop all day long and rack up fines for flopping. I'd want our court to be as shiny as the back of his head.
Kerrsed wrote:I'd rather have the Spurs win it than the Warriors, lol.
And yes, i just said that.
Kerrsed wrote:Qwigglez wrote:sunskerr wrote:Come on Santa. We've been good Suns fans and we deserve an early Christmas.
What would be a good Christmas for the Suns in your opinion?
Son of Ra wrote:I've been checking the forum like every hour at least in the last weeks hoping for a trade, even if just for a trade's sake, but at this point I'm more than fine standing pat.
I think a trade in the off-season/trade day makes a lot more sense for us than doing something now.
- We can see where our pick lands, have more time to evaluate our potential picks.
- Knight's value can't get any lower so we might as well play him and see what happens (I hate watching him too). We don't need the cap space and worst that can happen is us losing more games. Like some have suggested, start him every other game and rest Bledsoe.
- One of the few things that are right with the squad today is chemistry and an off-season trade does way less harm than one half way through, _especially_ if it were to be Bledsoe.
GoranTragic wrote:Lakers want a second round pick for Young. Setting up the ultimate tank after moving Williams.
carey wrote:Son of Ra wrote:I've been checking the forum like every hour at least in the last weeks hoping for a trade, even if just for a trade's sake, but at this point I'm more than fine standing pat.
I think a trade in the off-season/trade day makes a lot more sense for us than doing something now.
- We can see where our pick lands, have more time to evaluate our potential picks.
- Knight's value can't get any lower so we might as well play him and see what happens (I hate watching him too). We don't need the cap space and worst that can happen is us losing more games. Like some have suggested, start him every other game and rest Bledsoe.
- One of the few things that are right with the squad today is chemistry and an off-season trade does way less harm than one half way through, _especially_ if it were to be Bledsoe.
This is what I've been saying for a while with one caveat. I think the refusal to include part of our young core for Cousins means that should we get a solid offer for Eric we'd move him. Whether that's now or before the season starts depends on who is chasing him. I would imagine that we'd like to make sure we are picking #1 or #2 before pulling the trigger on the Bledsoe trade but Dennis Smith Jr. is also going to be special and there's a very good chance he'll be there when we draft.