ImageImageImage

2021-22 Season Discussion and Speculation

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez

Do you truly expect the Suns to win the finals this year?

Yes
18
55%
No
15
45%
 
Total votes: 33

WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: 2021-22 Season Discussion and Speculation 

Post#1541 » by WeekapaugGroove » Wed Dec 15, 2021 8:06 pm

Ghost of Kleine wrote:
WeekapaugGroove wrote:
Ghost of Kleine wrote:
Yeah! That'd be crazy right!
Because teams never ever do that right before a trade do they??? :roll:
It Just seems convenient that he's now sitting out right before he can be traded on the 15th. Also right around the same time that we are hearing reports of other team's professed interest in him too. And just after he had a somewhat breakout performance that likely somewhat elevated his percieved value. Again, the timing just seems really convenient, or rather inconvenient considering our severe lack of big man depth and his need for securing more playing time to showcase himself prior to his own free agency. But perhaps you may be right? Or you may not? I guess we'll see on the 15th. Until then it's all mere speculation......Yes? :nod:

If Smith gets traded in the next couple days you can change my aviator and sig to whatever you want.

I'd bet he just got sick, which isn't shocking since Ayton just had the flu.


Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app

Lol!.................... No need or interest in that man! :D

I get that you think it's quite a longshot. And that's a fair perspective of course. It'd be pretty boring if everyone on this board always had the same perspectives. Anyways, I apologize if I was being passive aggressive. :-?
I just didn't care for the " come on" portion of the reply because for the longest time everyone on this board as well as outside of it has been prognosticating/ anticipating trades around Smith. And now that were a few days out of that actual possibility AND right after him having a good showing AND us being ridiculously shorthanded in our frontcourt size, AND right after hearing multiple reports of teams indicating interest to the suns in trading for him just two days out from the trade window opening, He's suddenly sitting out for the game. Also after looking fine in practice earlier in the same day as well, AND of course as history has repeatedly shown in the NBA in these scenarios, teams repeatedly keeping players included in trades out of games as to not risk injury or potentially damage percieved value prior to the trade. It just seems incredibly convenient.

Or as I stated you could be right, and this could just be an extreme outlier scenario wherein Smith suddenly got sick out of nowhere after looking fine in practice earlier that day. And just coming off a very good showing the previous game too. Perhaps we just have terrible luck again? Nothing is truly outside of the realm of possibility though in the NBA! " where impossible happens " as the saying goes right? :dontknow:
No offense intended. I like you and your posts Ghost.

Just saying it's often the simple explanation on things like this. People get sick. Smith has some terrible luck since coming to Phoenix because every time he might get an opportunity something seems to go wrong.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
User avatar
Ghost of Kleine
Master of Tweets
Posts: 16,370
And1: 9,057
Joined: Apr 13, 2012

Re: 2021-22 Season Discussion and Speculation 

Post#1542 » by Ghost of Kleine » Wed Dec 15, 2021 10:04 pm

Phoenix Suns (@Suns) Tweeted:
#WallPaperWednesday but make it a Point God. https://t.co/LafcMRctXr
Read on Twitter
?s=20
Image
User avatar
Ghost of Kleine
Master of Tweets
Posts: 16,370
And1: 9,057
Joined: Apr 13, 2012

Re: 2021-22 Season Discussion and Speculation 

Post#1543 » by Ghost of Kleine » Wed Dec 15, 2021 10:29 pm

Zona (@ZonaHoops_) Tweeted:
Phoenix's 3PT% leaders:

1) Mikal Bridges - 40.7%
2) Cam Johnson - 40.6%
3) Devin Booker - 40.3%
4) Landry Shamet - 37.9%
5) Jae Crowder - 34.0%
Read on Twitter
?s=20
Image
User avatar
bigfoot
Suns Forum Anti-Tank Commander
Posts: 9,902
And1: 6,518
Joined: Sep 16, 2010
 

Re: 2021-22 Season Discussion and Speculation 

Post#1544 » by bigfoot » Wed Dec 15, 2021 11:04 pm

Ghost of Kleine wrote:1- We should have looked to utilize free agency better than just adding cast off bargain options in Payton, Hutchinson, Wainwright rather than more established and proven impact players even near the end of free agency. Could we really not have filled that additional two way slot with more legitimate size for insurance with Sarics' injury situation and in knowing the potential for injuries and/ or possible Covid restrictions affecting our depth. Or perhaps IF we had only spent on better legitimate available options that could have added more measurable production during these injuries as opposed to what Payton, Hutchinson and Wainwright have been unable to provide? Technically we have 5 roster spots adding close to or no impact whatsoever in terms of production. How many other actual contending teams share that situation?


Hutchinson and Wainwright are two-way contracts. I never expected them to be major contributors on the floor. They are practice fodder. Wainwright getting minutes is solely a function of the number of injured/ill Suns players.

I didn't like the Payton signing. But that it is what is. Starting today (Dec 15) he should be used in any trade package to upgrade the team.

Ghost of Kleine wrote:2- Could we not with 6 players being out due to extensive injury longer than two weeks ( Saric/ Kaminsky/ Nader and even Booker) or with sickness, And once we knew that with Kaminskys' injury likely keeping him out as well most ( if not all) of the season, leaving us without two of our frontcourt rotation players, filed for hardship exceptions? You know, as other teams such as the Chicago bulls and Memphis have recently done. So that we can address these depth concerns with a minimum ( non guaranteed) 10 day contract option?


Well, the hardship exception is only available if the roster is maxed at 15 players. Since it is not, the Suns aren't eligible to use it. Personally, I would rather hold onto that open 15th spot to fill in with a waived player or if it is needed for a trade.

Ghost of Kleine wrote:Wouldn't that be a more reasonable option than trying to trot out our 3rd string fringe bust nba cast offs into starting and secondary impact roles against other teams starters and high end bench players, knowing that they're not at all ready or capable of sustaining the level of production needed to keep us viable with sustained success during this outlier situation?


Well you've got to give Wainwright his chance. Look what Frank did this season and what Cam Payne did in the bubble. So far Wainwright looks like a scrub. I don't think it is unreasonable to try an unknown player who went through training camp, understands the system, and practices with the other players regularly. Contrast that with finding some miracle cure player who is not in the league right now, who can come in, be inserted into a rotational player position, and be successful.

Ghost of Kleine wrote:I also get that it's only 5 losses currently. I really do. And I'm not at all looking to overreact here. The actual entire premise of my post isn't even about our depth or injury issues if were being honest. It's quite simply that in all of our losses, The contributing factors have ( as stated above in my post) been the same. And my post was about actually looking to upgrade the fringe roster positions that are exacerbating these issues even aside from our additional depth issues.


Well the Suns are on pace for a 67-15 record. That would be the best record in franchise history. It would also be top 8 all-time in the NBA.

Ghost of Kleine wrote:Agree or disagree, I just don't think we can be considered legitimate title contenders without upgrading from Payton, Hutchinson, Wainwright and even Nader whose majority contribution to our team since being here is knee injuries and mediocre/ inconsistent play. As the season wears on, And as more and more teams identify and expose our repetitive weaknesses that have continually contributed to our losses, We'll have to rely much more heavily on a shortened roster to offset the lack of LEGITIMATE QUALITY depth from our bench. Meaning our starters and remaining key bench players will have to log more significant minutes during games. And with that lack of rest, I don't need to tell you how that c as n further exacerbate potential injuries and severe add fatigue to those players even before we get to the playoffs. Isn't having actual quality depth about being able to rest your star or key players as to avoid potential injuries and to allow for fresh legs and fully rested starters towards a legitimate championship run??

Can you honestly tell me that given Saric's injury, Kaminskys' injury, Naders' repetitive knee injuries, Booker's troublesome hamstring, Paul's age and injury history, McGee's foul accumulation propensity, etc. That you feel confident in any of Payton, Hutchinson, Wainwright, even Smith ( currently) to carry our bench production so we can rest our key players down the stretch??


The Suns are legitimate title contenders as constructed. In the playoffs. Hutchinson, Wainwright, and Payton are unlikely to see the floor except in mop-up time. The rotation will be shortened as usual. To be a title winner, the team, like most others, has to stay healthy at the right time of the year. There is no magic bullet out there where replacing Wainwright and Hutchinson makes the Suns title winners.

Ghost of Kleine wrote:Given those considerations, Is it really that much of an extreme hot take to feel that we need to upgrade our bench from those players?

Again, I get that we only (currently) have 5 losses. Which is great so far! But we both know that it doesn't take much for losses to build up fast. Or for teams to get in a slump. Especially if their starters get worn down over having to play extensive minutes. Kind of like Ayton had to do last night along with Paul recently to help carry the production. Which neither have should have had to do given their respective situations ( Ayton being sick) or Paul ( his age/ durability concerns). Our current bench just doesn't offer/ capable of the legitimate quality
Production needed to weather these situations against other teams higher tier established veteran benches. We need to upgrade our bench in certain areas. AND we also need to look to address these repeated areas of weakness during our games. IF we can upgrade to the proper bench personnel, Then we can add specific players with skillsets that will shore up these weaknesses that have repeatedly contributed to teams beating us. As well as negate a measurable number of these close to the wire games causing us to have to play our starters extended minutes this early into the season.


So yes it's a hot take to say replacing Wainwright and Hutchison are keys to making a championship team. They're two-way players.

We are thin at the real rotational bench with a playmaking and scoring threat. Should Payne go down, the bench would be hard-pressed with Payton, Shamet, CamJo, and McGee to run the show. With Shamet's and Payne's up-and-down performance so far this season, we need a facilitator who can get points as well. Again, I lean toward Rose or Dragic.
Jdiddy701
RealGM
Posts: 10,145
And1: 6,555
Joined: Jun 05, 2006

Re: 2021-22 Season Discussion and Speculation 

Post#1545 » by Jdiddy701 » Wed Dec 15, 2021 11:20 pm

I know this has been a topic recently but just got done watching NBA Today on ESPN, the entire show was about Golden State, Lakers and Dallas. They have a small portion of CP3 highlights from last night. ESPN sucks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Revived
RealGM
Posts: 37,453
And1: 22,230
Joined: Feb 17, 2011

Re: 2021-22 Season Discussion and Speculation 

Post#1546 » by Revived » Wed Dec 15, 2021 11:30 pm

Jdiddy701 wrote:I know this has been a topic recently but just got done watching NBA Today on ESPN, the entire show was about Golden State, Lakers and Dallas. They have a small portion of CP3 highlights from last night. ESPN sucks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Are you surprised though?
Revived
RealGM
Posts: 37,453
And1: 22,230
Joined: Feb 17, 2011

Re: 2021-22 Season Discussion and Speculation 

Post#1547 » by Revived » Wed Dec 15, 2021 11:33 pm

Ghost of Kleine wrote:Zona (@ZonaHoops_) Tweeted:
Phoenix's 3PT% leaders:

1) Mikal Bridges - 40.7%
2) Cam Johnson - 40.6%
3) Devin Booker - 40.3%
4) Landry Shamet - 37.9%
5) Jae Crowder - 34.0%
Read on Twitter
?s=20

Shamet is paid to exclusively be a 3pt shooter and still hitting under 40% is disappointing. He should be leading the team and hitting like 44%+ considering that’s his only job imo, he’s awful at basically every other part of the game.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,209
And1: 61,030
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: 2021-22 Season Discussion and Speculation 

Post#1548 » by bwgood77 » Thu Dec 16, 2021 12:35 am

Mulhollanddrive wrote:We've been 6 points worse offensively without Booker.

I'm thinking the Charlotte game as a return date would give him 20 days since the injury.

Also Utah have a block of 42 games coming up where they play GSW and Phoenix 8 times.


So Utah can gain some serious ground. Though that is over half a season.
User avatar
cberry78
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,283
And1: 1,420
Joined: Apr 21, 2015
 

Re: 2021-22 Season Discussion and Speculation 

Post#1549 » by cberry78 » Thu Dec 16, 2021 2:06 am

bwgood77 wrote:
Mulhollanddrive wrote:We've been 6 points worse offensively without Booker.

I'm thinking the Charlotte game as a return date would give him 20 days since the injury.

Also Utah have a block of 42 games coming up where they play GSW and Phoenix 8 times.


So Utah can gain some serious ground. Though that is over half a season.

Image
"Never argue with an idiot. You'll never convince the idiot that you're correct, and bystanders won't be able to tell who's who." - Mark Twain
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,209
And1: 61,030
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: 2021-22 Season Discussion and Speculation 

Post#1550 » by bwgood77 » Thu Dec 16, 2021 2:33 am

cberry78 wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
Mulhollanddrive wrote:We've been 6 points worse offensively without Booker.

I'm thinking the Charlotte game as a return date would give him 20 days since the injury.

Also Utah have a block of 42 games coming up where they play GSW and Phoenix 8 times.


So Utah can gain some serious ground. Though that is over half a season.

Image


Well they have been crushing a lot of teams, unless you that gif is related to the "has to play these guys in the next 42 games" part.

https://www.espn.com/nba/team/schedule/_/name/utah
User avatar
cberry78
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,283
And1: 1,420
Joined: Apr 21, 2015
 

Re: 2021-22 Season Discussion and Speculation 

Post#1551 » by cberry78 » Thu Dec 16, 2021 2:50 am

bwgood77 wrote:
cberry78 wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
So Utah can gain some serious ground. Though that is over half a season.

Image


Well they have been crushing a lot of teams, unless you that gif is related to the "has to play these guys in the next 42 games" part.

https://www.espn.com/nba/team/schedule/_/name/utah

Actually, the gif was to the "gain some serious ground" aspect of your post - I don't see the Jazz doing better than 4-4 combined against the Suns and Warriors over that 42 game span (barring serious injury of course). I'm not saying the Jazz are a bad team, I just don't fear them in any sense, regardless of how good they've been recently. As of right now, they are at least a tier below the Suns and Warriors, and probably below the Nets as well (imo).
"Never argue with an idiot. You'll never convince the idiot that you're correct, and bystanders won't be able to tell who's who." - Mark Twain
ImNotMcDiSwear
General Manager
Posts: 8,287
And1: 6,411
Joined: Dec 14, 2013
 

Re: 2021-22 Season Discussion and Speculation 

Post#1552 » by ImNotMcDiSwear » Thu Dec 16, 2021 4:35 am

cberry78 wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
cberry78 wrote:Image


Well they have been crushing a lot of teams, unless you that gif is related to the "has to play these guys in the next 42 games" part.

https://www.espn.com/nba/team/schedule/_/name/utah

Actually, the gif was to the "gain some serious ground" aspect of your post - I don't see the Jazz doing better than 4-4 combined against the Suns and Warriors over that 42 game span (barring serious injury of course). I'm not saying the Jazz are a bad team, I just don't fear them in any sense, regardless of how good they've been recently. As of right now, they are at least a tier below the Suns and Warriors, and probably below the Nets as well (imo).


I think there are five "best" teams which, if fully healthy, are roughly equal to each other - Bucks, Suns, Jazz, Warriors, Nets. Nets may be least among equals, given their lack of time together. A lot of people are writing off the Jazz completely because of how they self-destructed against the Clippers last year, but that could have been us. You can add the Clippers to that list if Kawhi returns to full form by the playoffs.

Lots of room at the top, fellas. Don't get cocky. After all, we're just 36-year old's hamstring away from getting our a$$es busted.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,209
And1: 61,030
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: 2021-22 Season Discussion and Speculation 

Post#1553 » by bwgood77 » Thu Dec 16, 2021 4:39 am

cberry78 wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
cberry78 wrote:Image


Well they have been crushing a lot of teams, unless you that gif is related to the "has to play these guys in the next 42 games" part.

https://www.espn.com/nba/team/schedule/_/name/utah

Actually, the gif was to the "gain some serious ground" aspect of your post - I don't see the Jazz doing better than 4-4 combined against the Suns and Warriors over that 42 game span (barring serious injury of course). I'm not saying the Jazz are a bad team, I just don't fear them in any sense, regardless of how good they've been recently. As of right now, they are at least a tier below the Suns and Warriors, and probably below the Nets as well (imo).


Yeah, I have no idea since they haven't played either, but they have played very well and are only a couple of losses behind both us and GS.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,209
And1: 61,030
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: 2021-22 Season Discussion and Speculation 

Post#1554 » by bwgood77 » Thu Dec 16, 2021 4:41 am

ImNotMcDiSwear wrote:
cberry78 wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
Well they have been crushing a lot of teams, unless you that gif is related to the "has to play these guys in the next 42 games" part.

https://www.espn.com/nba/team/schedule/_/name/utah

Actually, the gif was to the "gain some serious ground" aspect of your post - I don't see the Jazz doing better than 4-4 combined against the Suns and Warriors over that 42 game span (barring serious injury of course). I'm not saying the Jazz are a bad team, I just don't fear them in any sense, regardless of how good they've been recently. As of right now, they are at least a tier below the Suns and Warriors, and probably below the Nets as well (imo).


I think there are five "best" teams which, if fully healthy, are roughly equal to each other - Bucks, Suns, Jazz, Warriors, Nets. Nets may be least among equals, given their lack of time together. A lot of people are writing off the Jazz completely because of how they self-destructed against the Clippers last year, but that could have been us. You can add the Clippers to that list if Kawhi returns to full form by the playoffs.

Lots of room at the top, fellas. Don't get cocky. After all, we're just 36-year old's hamstring away from getting our a$$es busted.


Yeah, good chance the Jazz win if their guards were not banged up last year and I have no idea how we would have done against them, though I felt pretty confident based on our regular season matchups. But I certainly wouldn't write them off. I'd rather face anyone else in the west except the Warriors with a healthy good Klay back.
User avatar
Ghost of Kleine
Master of Tweets
Posts: 16,370
And1: 9,057
Joined: Apr 13, 2012

Re: 2021-22 Season Discussion and Speculation 

Post#1555 » by Ghost of Kleine » Thu Dec 16, 2021 4:54 am

bigfoot wrote:
Ghost of Kleine wrote:1- We should have looked to utilize free agency better than just adding cast off bargain options in Payton, Hutchinson, Wainwright rather than more established and proven impact players even near the end of free agency. Could we really not have filled that additional two way slot with more legitimate size for insurance with Sarics' injury situation and in knowing the potential for injuries and/ or possible Covid restrictions affecting our depth. Or perhaps IF we had only spent on better legitimate available options that could have added more measurable production during these injuries as opposed to what Payton, Hutchinson and Wainwright have been unable to provide? Technically we have 5 roster spots adding close to or no impact whatsoever in terms of production. How many other actual contending teams share that situation?


Hutchinson and Wainwright are two-way contracts. I never expected them to be major contributors on the floor. They are practice fodder. Wainwright getting minutes is solely a function of the number of injured/ill Suns players.
I get that they're two way players, And yes, I agree every team needs cheap players that can challenge the actualtotation players in practice. But my question remains that seeing as in the event of injuryor covid related protocols, Shouldwe really be setting the bar on players that at best might he able to challenge in practices over more proven higher quality depth choices? Any of the more impactful late free agency considerations also could've challenged in practices too. But they additionally could've also offered better production in these anomalous situations. As contenders we need to utilize all of our roster positions to their fullest extent. And with the best available options, rather than potentially selling ourselves short by allowing other teams to add higher quality depth instead.

I didn't like the Payton signing. But that it is what is. Starting today (Dec 15) he should be used in any trade package to upgrade the team.

I can agree with you on this premise that it is what it is. And I also agree that he should be packaged for a legitimate upgrade!

Ghost of Kleine wrote:2- Could we not with 6 players being out due to extensive injury longer than two weeks ( Saric/ Kaminsky/ Nader and even Booker) or with sickness, And once we knew that with Kaminskys' injury likely keeping him out as well most ( if not all) of the season, leaving us without two of our frontcourt rotation players, filed for hardship exceptions? You know, as other teams such as the Chicago bulls and Memphis have recently done. So that we can address these depth concerns with a minimum ( non guaranteed) 10 day contract option?


Well, the hardship exception is only available if the roster is maxed at 15 players. Since it is not, the Suns aren't eligible to use it. Personally, I would rather hold onto that open 15th spot to fill in with a waived player or if it is needed for a trade.

Yeah, I read that too. And that's why I wanted us to invest that last spot in a low cost 2nd round upside big man option. Or else look to fill that last spot with a quality vers' minimum option. As we could've added either Zeller or Whiteside at minimal cost. And IF we needed to make a roster spot available for a trader buyout option, Then we'd simply waive or buy them out for close to nothing anyways.


Ghost of Kleine wrote:Wouldn't that be a more reasonable option than trying to trot out our 3rd string fringe bust nba cast offs into starting and secondary impact roles against other teams starters and high end bench players, knowing that they're not at all ready or capable of sustaining the level of production needed to keep us viable with sustained success during this outlier situation?


Well you've got to give Wainwright his chance. Look what Frank did this season and what Cam Payne did in the bubble. So far Wainwright looks like a scrub. I don't think it is unreasonable to try an unknown player who went through training camp, understands the system, and practices with the other players regularly. Contrast that with finding some miracle cure player who is not in the league right now, who can come in, be inserted into a rotational player position, and be successful.

You're not wrong on this premise. When we first picked up Wainwright,
I had legitimate hopes for him to become that strong defensive wing stopper for us. Hence my initial comparison in my posts for his thread. Same premise I had hoped for Smith too. But as a legitimate title contender, I personally feel it's important to always seek improvements to your roster. The above mentioned players including Wainwright should at all times be available for such premises.
And given all of their repeated struggles when given those " in game opportunities" they should be held to the same standard as Smith or any other minimum player unable to provide reasonable production. Because as you yourself said, They know the system, have had training camp, and practices regularly with the team. In that consideration, they should understand and play their roles better than what they've shown to date. Especially considering they already have more in game experience for other teams as established NBA veterans. Lastly, we're not talking about some miracle cure players that are not in the league here. All of the considerations that I've mentioned actually have shown legitimate statistical production beyond what these three players mentioned have shown. They're actually a known commodity in this regard. Making them more of a sure thing in terms of actual statistical contributions as opposed to near bust cast offs that have been repeatedly released from other teams for lack of contribution/ impact. Again, IF we're seriously "all in," Then we need to utilize all of our roster depth spots to the fullest in terms of statistical contributions and impact.



Ghost of Kleine wrote:I also get that it's only 5 losses currently. I really do. And I'm not at all looking to overreact here. The actual entire premise of my post isn't even about our depth or injury issues if were being honest. It's quite simply that in all of our losses, The contributing factors have ( as stated above in my post) been the same. And my post was about actually looking to upgrade the fringe roster positions that are exacerbating these issues even aside from our additional depth issues.


Well the Suns are on pace for a 67-15 record. That would be the best record in franchise history. It would also be top 8 all-time in the NBA.

Again, That would be awesome! But highly unrealistic IF we keep having to push our starters ( especially our 37 yr old HOF guard) as many heavy minutes as we have so early in the season to offset the lack of consistency and production from our bench. The more we have to play our starters heavy minutes due to our bench inconsistencies, the more we increase the risk of injury as well as significant fatigue. This will result in reduced efficiency, increased mistakes, general lethargy, etc. None of which is to our benefit as the season progresses and gets much more competitive.

Ghost of Kleine wrote:Agree or disagree, I just don't think we can be considered legitimate title contenders without upgrading from Payton, Hutchinson, Wainwright and even Nader whose majority contribution to our team since being here is knee injuries and mediocre/ inconsistent play. As the season wears on, And as more and more teams identify and expose our repetitive weaknesses that have continually contributed to our losses, We'll have to rely much more heavily on a shortened roster to offset the lack of LEGITIMATE QUALITY depth from our bench. Meaning our starters and remaining key bench players will have to log more significant minutes during games. And with that lack of rest, I don't need to tell you how that c as n further exacerbate potential injuries and severe add fatigue to those players even before we get to the playoffs. Isn't having actual quality depth about being able to rest your star or key players as to avoid potential injuries and to allow for fresh legs and fully rested starters towards a legitimate championship run??

Can you honestly tell me that given Saric's injury, Kaminskys' injury, Naders' repetitive knee injuries, Booker's troublesome hamstring, Paul's age and injury history, McGee's foul accumulation propensity, etc. That you feel confident in any of Payton, Hutchinson, Wainwright, even Smith ( currently) to carry our bench production so we can rest our key players down the stretch??


The Suns are legitimate title contenders as constructed. In the playoffs. Hutchinson, Wainwright, and Payton are unlikely to see the floor except in mop-up time. The rotation will be shortened as usual. To be a title winner, the team, like most others, has to stay healthy at the right time of the year. There is no magic bullet out there where replacing Wainwright and Hutchinson makes the Suns title winners.

Yes!
Except with injuries and potential Covid protocol situations, general fatigue, we've already seen that they're playing time won't actually be limited to just " mop up time" BECAUSE of long term injuries creating extended depth issues. And the result of their forced playing time against more legitimate opposing benches has not been overtly encouraging so far from what they've shown.
You talk of a " shortened rotation." But does that not also increase the wear and tear towards potential further injuries and fatigue/ burnout this early into the season? Do we really want to risk over fatiguing our starters even before we get to the playoffs? Isn't it proven to be more beneficial to have your starters well rested and with fresh legs? That's why actual quality depth is important vs. Taking chances on minimum value cast offs. As you said, to be a title contender, your team has to stay healthy! But how good are the odds of that going to be if those starters/ key rotation players have to consistently play heavy minutes on tired legs due to our bench being inconsistent and oft non productive when it counts? I agree that there's no magic bullet that guarantees us a title. But obviously upgrading from two cast off players that can't reliably contribute and we're not sure when/ if they even can is a pretty solid start. I mean Hutchinson wasn't even playing hardly at all because he was so bad that he had to be sent to the GLeague to hopefully figure things out! And Wainwrights' shooting/ production has been what again for us exactly? You replace either or both of those players with more known proven statistical commodities, And our bench doesn't struggle as often. This would allow us to actually maintain leads and close out games more often. Affording our starters much needed rest against continued wear and tear and fatigue. That alone increases our chances significantly.



Ghost of Kleine wrote:Given those considerations, Is it really that much of an extreme hot take to feel that we need to upgrade our bench from those players?

Again, I get that we only (currently) have 5 losses. Which is great so far! But we both know that it doesn't take much for losses to build up fast. Or for teams to get in a slump. Especially if their starters get worn down over having to play extensive minutes. Kind of like Ayton had to do last night along with Paul recently to help carry the production. Which neither have should have had to do given their respective situations ( Ayton being sick) or Paul ( his age/ durability concerns). Our current bench just doesn't offer/ capable of the legitimate quality
Production needed to weather these situations against other teams higher tier established veteran benches. We need to upgrade our bench in certain areas. AND we also need to look to address these repeated areas of weakness during our games. IF we can upgrade to the proper bench personnel, Then we can add specific players with skillsets that will shore up these weaknesses that have repeatedly contributed to teams beating us. As well as negate a measurable number of these close to the wire games causing us to have to play our starters extended minutes this early into the season.


So yes it's a hot take to say replacing Wainwright and Hutchison are keys to making a championship team. They're two-way players.

Again, Just because they're two way players, doesn't excuse them from needing to contribute or have a measurable impact. You replace either or both with a more legitimate and proven producer through buyout or trade, and that goes a long way towards improvement and consistency for our bench production. As well as giving us actual proven depth that can be counted on to contribute when their numbers are called. These upgrades would make us a better team, and as a result, also increases our odds as a legitimate title contender.

We are thin at the real rotational bench with a playmaking and scoring threat. Should Payne go down, the bench would be hard-pressed with Payton, Shamet, CamJo, and McGee to run the show. With Shamet's and Payne's up-and-down performance so far this season, we need a facilitator who can get points as well. Again, I lean toward Rose or Dragic.


I fully agree with this statement! It may not be a popular consideration, and highly unlikely given his salary commitment too over the next couple of seasons. But recently, I've pondered a Shamet/ Saric OR Shamet/ Smith/ Payton swap for Eric Gordon. He's very costly! But a consummate leader somewhat like Paul. Is a proven offensive initiator and is still a good ballhandler and defensive 2/3. Again, I wouldn't at all like his salary commitment. But IF were legitimately looking to go " All in" for a title. Gordon would be considered a very serious statement towards that interest. :nod:
Image
Slim Charless
RealGM
Posts: 11,700
And1: 7,431
Joined: May 10, 2019
   

Re: 2021-22 Season Discussion and Speculation 

Post#1556 » by Slim Charless » Thu Dec 16, 2021 4:57 am

Revived wrote:
Jdiddy701 wrote:I know this has been a topic recently but just got done watching NBA Today on ESPN, the entire show was about Golden State, Lakers and Dallas. They have a small portion of CP3 highlights from last night. ESPN sucks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Are you surprised though?


That entire show is Lakers, Steph and occasionally the Knicks. Also, WHY is Kendrick Perkins such a huge part of it? He's so annoying.

They should at least have Malika Andrews wear less clothing lol. (I'm kidding mods)
User avatar
Ghost of Kleine
Master of Tweets
Posts: 16,370
And1: 9,057
Joined: Apr 13, 2012

Re: 2021-22 Season Discussion and Speculation 

Post#1557 » by Ghost of Kleine » Thu Dec 16, 2021 6:25 am

https://hoopshype.com/lists/nba-players-trade-eligible-december-15/
( ** and their salaries included).
Any players from these teams that we should be looking at in a salary swap??
Image
ImNotMcDiSwear
General Manager
Posts: 8,287
And1: 6,411
Joined: Dec 14, 2013
 

Re: 2021-22 Season Discussion and Speculation 

Post#1558 » by ImNotMcDiSwear » Thu Dec 16, 2021 6:44 am

Ghost of Kleine wrote:https://hoopshype.com/lists/nba-players-trade-eligible-december-15/
( ** and their salaries included).
Any players from these teams that we should be looking at in a salary swap??


I'll take one Tony Snell, for free, please.
User avatar
Ghost of Kleine
Master of Tweets
Posts: 16,370
And1: 9,057
Joined: Apr 13, 2012

Re: 2021-22 Season Discussion and Speculation 

Post#1559 » by Ghost of Kleine » Thu Dec 16, 2021 7:06 am

ImNotMcDiSwear wrote:
Ghost of Kleine wrote:https://hoopshype.com/lists/nba-players-trade-eligible-december-15/
( ** and their salaries included).
Any players from these teams that we should be looking at in a salary swap??


I'll take one Tony Snell, for free, please.

Image

Swap him for Nader or Payton honestly! :nod:
Image
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,209
And1: 61,030
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: 2021-22 Season Discussion and Speculation 

Post#1560 » by bwgood77 » Thu Dec 16, 2021 9:38 am

ImNotMcDiSwear wrote:
cberry78 wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
Well they have been crushing a lot of teams, unless you that gif is related to the "has to play these guys in the next 42 games" part.

https://www.espn.com/nba/team/schedule/_/name/utah

Actually, the gif was to the "gain some serious ground" aspect of your post - I don't see the Jazz doing better than 4-4 combined against the Suns and Warriors over that 42 game span (barring serious injury of course). I'm not saying the Jazz are a bad team, I just don't fear them in any sense, regardless of how good they've been recently. As of right now, they are at least a tier below the Suns and Warriors, and probably below the Nets as well (imo).


I think there are five "best" teams which, if fully healthy, are roughly equal to each other - Bucks, Suns, Jazz, Warriors, Nets. Nets may be least among equals, given their lack of time together. A lot of people are writing off the Jazz completely because of how they self-destructed against the Clippers last year, but that could have been us. You can add the Clippers to that list if Kawhi returns to full form by the playoffs.

Lots of room at the top, fellas. Don't get cocky. After all, we're just 36-year old's hamstring away from getting our a$$es busted.


I should have mentioned Miami probably belongs in that group too, especially with a healthy Bam and Butler. They had the best record in the east early. But Bam went down and is out awhile and Jimmy has missed a ton. Lowry has missed some too. And it's crazy they often still win with not much for names.

But they can throw a Lowry/Duncan/Butler/Tucker/Bam lineup with Herro off the bench against anyone and have a chance. That's solid D with some guards that can get hot, a C who can pass and defend and a top 10 player or so in Butler. It's interesting how they matchup defensively with our starters...you can go down the position and each one is pretty equal.

They also have Herro off the bench so not a bad 6th man along with a great coach and finals experience (Lowry with a championship).

Return to Phoenix Suns


cron