Eric Bledsoe

Revived · Post #201 » by **Revived** » Wed Nov 13, 2013 8:28 am

Thread on the Hornets forum about who they would rather have, Holliday or Bledsoe:

http://www.pelicansreport.com/showthrea ... e30ea0bdce

sunskerr · Post #202 » by **sunskerr** » Wed Nov 13, 2013 8:43 am

Bledsoe right now is averaging 20/7 on great %s. If he keeps up his good play, it wouldn't really be that painful for the front office to match a big offer sheet, to be honest.

Ryu · Post #203 » by **Ryu** » Wed Nov 13, 2013 9:12 am

I`d have Bledsoe on my team over Holiday any day of the week and twice on Sunday.

Matching any offer in restricted free agency is a no-brainer, indeed.

Revived · Post #204 » by **Revived** » Wed Nov 13, 2013 9:26 am

If Bledsoe wasn't in the West with guys like CP3, Parker, Curry, Lillard, Westbrook then I would say he has a good shot being an All Star in the near future.

Saberestar · Post #205 » by **Saberestar** » Wed Nov 13, 2013 11:32 pm

Eric Bledsoe stars in the new Suns commercial.

http://www.nba.com/suns/video/playlist/ ... d-campaign

NaturalBuns · Post #206 » by **NaturalBuns** » Thu Nov 14, 2013 12:27 am

SF88 wrote:If Bledsoe wasn't in the West with guys like CP3, Parker, Curry, Lillard, Westbrook then I would say he has a good shot being an All Star in the near future.

Curry is never going to have a healthy career.
He can be a allstar in the near future hes 23.

carey · Post #207 » by **carey** » Thu Nov 14, 2013 4:54 am

I keep waiting for Bledsoe to have an off game... but he keeps going. He can be an all-star this year. At least a coach's selection. He's playing too well.

B-easy · Post #208 » by **B-easy** » Thu Nov 14, 2013 5:48 am

bledsoe only hit 1 of his last 8 shots today.

DirtyDez · Post #209 » by **DirtyDez** » Thu Nov 14, 2013 6:13 am

Pay da man. His finishing ability will improve over time but he'll probably tell ya that last shot on Batum should've gone down

carey · Post #210 » by **carey** » Thu Nov 14, 2013 6:31 am

B-easy wrote:bledsoe only hit 1 of his last 8 shots today.

He was gassed. But he was still 10 of 21 for 23 points and almost another game winner.

I thoroughly enjoyed that game and I'm enjoying HIS game. Been a while since we had a guy that fearless at going to the rim (Marbury). Here's to hoping he has zero of that cat's crazy in him though.

Blackification · Post #211 » by **Blackification** » Thu Nov 14, 2013 7:06 am

B-easy wrote:bledsoe only hit 1 of his last 8 shots today.

he hurt his hand towards the end of the third or second. It was wrapped up in the fourth quarter

Revived · Post #212 » by **Revived** » Thu Nov 14, 2013 7:06 am

Bledsoe was making some ridiculous layups today. Absolutely ridiculous.

He was exhausted in that 4th QTR and we had literally nobody scoring the ball except for him.

Fatigue factored into him shooting 1-8 in his last 9 shots big time.

Dragic13 · Post #213 » by **Dragic13** » Thu Nov 14, 2013 7:21 am

That's why I think the Dragic and Bledsoe combo is so good. Even when they are on the court together they can help each others stamina by sharing the ball.

We would be 8-0 with Dragic healthy.

No doubt in my mind.

Also I think Dragic is way more clutch in the final minutes.

So the fact that we keep losing towards the end of games is troubling.

Bledsoe is forcing shots at the end of games.

Dragic13 · Post #214 » by **Dragic13** » Thu Nov 14, 2013 7:27 am

The only games we have lost are without Dragic right?

Bledsoe is a great player but these three losses show how much our team needs Dragic.

carey · Post #215 » by **carey** » Thu Nov 14, 2013 7:34 am

Dragic13 wrote:The only games we have lost are without Dragic right?

Bledsoe is a great player but these three losses show how much our team needs Dragic.

Yes. A team generally needs their second best player in order to win. ;-)

Revived · Post #216 » by **Revived** » Thu Nov 14, 2013 8:10 am

Dragic13 wrote:
We would be 8-0 with Dragic healthy.

No doubt in my mind.

Dragic13 wrote:The only games we have lost are without Dragic right?

Wait, so we would have won if we had Dragic for those 3 games?

So let me get this straight, we wouldn't have lost any games if we had Dragic healthy?

Dragic13 · Post #217 » by **Dragic13** » Thu Nov 14, 2013 8:12 am

SF88 wrote:
Dragic13 wrote:
We would be 8-0 with Dragic healthy.

No doubt in my mind.

Dragic13 wrote:The only games we have lost are without Dragic right?

Wait, so we would have won if we had Dragic for those 3 games?

So let me get this straight, we wouldn't have lost any games if we had Dragic healthy?

?

BurningHeart · Post #218 » by **BurningHeart** » Thu Nov 14, 2013 7:53 pm

SF88 wrote:
Dragic13 wrote:
We would be 8-0 with Dragic healthy.

No doubt in my mind.

Dragic13 wrote:The only games we have lost are without Dragic right?

Wait, so we would have won if we had Dragic for those 3 games?

So let me get this straight, we wouldn't have lost any games if we had Dragic healthy?

Uh, yeah, probably not.

NaturalBuns · Post #219 » by **NaturalBuns** » Thu Nov 14, 2013 8:03 pm

SF88 wrote:
Dragic13 wrote:
We would be 8-0 with Dragic healthy.

No doubt in my mind.

Dragic13 wrote:The only games we have lost are without Dragic right?

Wait, so we would have won if we had Dragic for those 3 games?

So let me get this straight, we wouldn't have lost any games if we had Dragic healthy?

We had leads in the OKC and POR AND momentum in both of those games till dragic went down, it happened the exact same way it did in the OKC game POR went on a 9-0 run right after.

at the very minimum 7-1. But hey injuries are apart of the game definitely no excuses. IMO ish Smith needs to play somehow someway

Revived · Post #220 » by **Revived** » Thu Nov 14, 2013 11:01 pm

I was joking around cause Dragic13 basically said the same thing like 3 times so I was doing the same lol.