Kerrsed wrote:1UPZ wrote::P
Mulhollanddrive wrote:Is Kevin Love the answer long term?
With Booker, Warren and Love as potentially our best players, there's not much defense there.
No. Not if you want to win a ring.
Suns need long versatile defenders.
I really like Warren.. But he isnt a shut down defender to offset Love. We all know Booker also struggles defensively.
With Love... You have 3 potential players that the good teams will exploit.... Thats just way too much.
Love needs a Ron Artest/Kawhi Leonard level SF defender to neutralize the issue.
I like Love.. But you need to a potential DPOY player at C and at SF to make it work.
I agree. A good defensive SF is exactly the solution, and perfect to guard the teams best player, whether he is a SG/SF/PF. A defensive SF can usually cover all three of those positions, rather than just a PF/C like a defensive PF can or PG/SG like a good defensive SG can.
In my eyes, for the perfect team you want a PG with decent defense (Bledsoe), an excellent shooting/scoring SG thats focused on offense (Booker), a great defensive SF (??????), a scoring in the paint and REBOUNDING PF (Warren?/Simmons?), and a defensive/rebounding C (Len?).
Now i think we definitely have 2 of those spots filled (Bledsoe/Booker). I would like to see Warren play some more PF and see if he can handle it, as being a bit undersized he can use his speed/sneakiness to steal rebounds away, and he seems rather comfortable in the paint with his vast array of floaters. As for Len......... i just wish he would try to spend some more time learning to rebound and defend. I thought Chandler could have helped him with that, and was the reason i was excited we got Chandler, as who better to teach him than a former defensive player of the year? Unfortunately i dont think that has necessarily happened. I want to see Len become a little more like Addams in OKC. Develop a mean streak.
As for that defensive SF, its hard. Middleton would have been perfect, but the Bucks just inked him to that fat contract this year. Milsap has been an outstanding defensive SF, but i dont see Atlanta looking to move him quite yet. Crowder is a pretty good defender, but he is waaaaaaaay too undersized (6'6) to guard PF's. One guy that i think we could definitely make a move for is James Johnson. He was an excellent defender during his stints in Chicago/Memphis, where he became known as a lock-down defender coming off the bench. He is the same age as Bledsoe and can be obtained for cheap (he's on an expiring contract). Trade Morris to Toronto for Johnson/Biyombo/1st (Toronto was reportedly looking for a usable "difference maker" player in return for one of their many 1st round picks). It gives us the rest of the season to take a good look at what Johnson can do and see at what price we would like to re-sign him at. Biyombo gives us a back-up C for if/when Len or Chandler get hurt (which one of them most certainly will).
http://www.rantsports.com/nba/2015/01/11/james-johnson-has-been-a-great-addition-to-the-toronto-raptors/http://www.grizzlybearblues.com/2013/12/30/5252768/Memphis-grizzlies-in-depth-look-at-james-johnson-kickboxing-MMA-athletehttp://grantland.com/the-triangle/they-call-him-bloodsport-james-johnson-kicks-his-way-into-the-nba/http://basketball.realgm.com/article/236003/How-James-Johnson-Resurrected-His-NBA-Career-Choosing-D-League-Instead-Of-OverseasTo me i see a younger/more defensive version of PJ Tucker.
Why on green earth would Toronto give up that pkg for Kieff? Kieff has been straight trash this season, has legal issues, and is starting to be known as a locker room cancer. I don't think Toronto had a .382 FG%, .298 3PT%, .410 eFG% in mind when they thought of a difference maker.
This isn't necessarily aimed at you, Kerrsed, but I think we need to get it into our head that Kieff is not a positive value right now. We are all trying to sell '12-'14 Kieff, but in reality, we have '15-'16 Kieff, as shown above. So not only has Kieff's game regressed, he's caused issues in the locker room, albeit not anything over the top, mind you, but he can't be considered a 'good' teammate, either. Then there is still the assault charge hanging over his head, which even though personally, I don't feel will be a deal breaker, but when putting all this together, and assuming you were a GM, would you trade positive assets for Kieff right now? On the 'hope' he returns to form, the 'hope' he doesn't miss time due to legal issues, and 'hope' that the FO doesn't 'upset' him again, causing him to act like a baby when things don't go his way. The ONLY reason he's toned down his attitude is to attempt to be marketable to get off this team.
So, with all that, why would Toronto trade 3 positive assets for one borderline negative asset. I'm not saying that Kieff can't be the best player, or isn't the most talented player, of the three players involved in the trade; what I
am saying is there are more questions than answers with Kieff right now. And if I'm Toronto's GM, I'm chuckling as I'm hanging up the phone after McD calls me with that trade offer. At the beginning of last season, we had a talented '6th Man' on a favorable deal. Now? Well, now, we are overpaying for a bottom-half of the league bench PF.
If McD can pull off that trade BEFORE Kieff's case is settled and before he get's back to a .500ish eFG%, then McD is the best 'Used Car' salesman on the planet.