bwgood77 wrote:Post from the trade board...
Kevin Love is the same age (31) as Joakim Noah was when the Knicks signed him to a four year deal in 2016. Both Injury-prone big men have four year deals, Noah for $72 mil, Love for $120.
Like Noah, the Love contract has the potential to be one of the worst contracts in the NBA.
I understand how CLE fans don’t want to factor this risk into a true valuation of Love, but I have to assume actual GM’s need to consider Love’s age, injury history, the size of the contract, and especially it’s length.
While he's not my favorite option, Love's contract and age don't concern me
that much too be honest. Yes, Love is the same age Noah was, he's also nearly the same age Nash was when he signed with the Suns (Nash was 6 months younger). Nash didn't have Love's injury history, but Noah was already a shadow of his former self when he signed with the Knicks and his game was much more predicated on athleticism than Love's is. Love is still playing really good basketball at the moment (16/10.5 on 61ts%).
Assuming we'd trade for Love at the trade deadline, we'd have him on the books for 2 1/2 years. We'd really only need Love to play well for a season and a half until he turns into a Tyler Johnson contract (i.e. an expiring we could potentially use to acquire another player when combined with an asset) - so it's not like the length of the contract is crippling.
Our team is still ridiculously young, with Booker, Ayton and Oubre - as well as Cam Johnson and Bridges assuming these guys will develop into key players. Adding a guy with championship experience to that mix (along with Rubio and Baynes) will definitely make us better in the short run. Kevin Love does bring a few things we could really use on this team: rebounding, three point shooting at the 4 position, hard screens. There also aren't a ton of viable alternatives out there for us in all honesty.
For the right price, I would welcome him here (the right price being expiring contracts and a loto protected first). James Jones hasn't been shy to "overpay" to get the guy he likes - he's basically been the opposite of the Danny Ainge school of having to win each individual trade (examples: clearing Warren's contract, offering top dollar for Rubio, picking Cam at 11). Therefore I wouldn't be surprised to see him through in a guy like Bridges to get the deal done (I hope he doesn't ofcourse).