SF88 wrote:bwgood77 wrote:
Well I do mean Melo, but Kobe even moreso.
Melo took $6M less over 5 years, but still got over $122 million, which was far more he could get anywhere else. Most he could have gotten elsewhere was probably something like 4 years, $88 million or something like that.
So he took about $1.2 million per year less than the NY max.
Dirk took $25 million instead of probably about $80 million.BobbieL wrote:
I don't begrudge Melo one bit. Just don't tell me its about winning. As it was about the money first
which is okay
But its not about winning
But Melo is different from LeBron, Kobe and Duncan. Those guys are past their prime. Carmelo still has 6 good years left.
NBA players especially those in their prime are stupid and idiotic to take pay cuts. Why the f**k should these players help their billionaire owners? It reminds me of the slave mentality to be honest. These superstar players go bust their ass and then are forced to take paycuts to help put decent players around their team.
The owners RAPED the players in the last CBA negotiations and this is just another example of that. The owners still get to do whatever the hell they want.
[tweet]https://twitter.com/ESPNSteinLine/status/489140025150693377[/tweet]
[tweet]https://twitter.com/ESPNSteinLine/status/489140214271860736[/tweet]
Marc Stein has never been more on point in his life.
I don't blame the owners for not wanting to pay so much. So many NBA players are crybabies. Owning a basketball team is no different than any other BUSINESS. The top expense is payroll. The players have way too much power in my opinion. Demanding trades and who is around them etc. Its ridiculous. Most of these "billionaire owners" you speak of had to work very hard for their money. Not everyone is lucky enough to be a professional athlete and get everything on a platter.
You could also ask why these billionaire owners should help the spoiled athletes?












