ImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread: Two drink minimum

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez

JDLAW
Suns Forum CBA and Legal Expert
Posts: 2,509
And1: 1,301
Joined: May 08, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread: Two drink minimum 

Post#241 » by JDLAW » Fri Nov 21, 2014 4:22 pm

WeekapaugGroove wrote:I love Goran but I think it could make sense to deal him. Chicago seems like a decent trade partner because he could put them over the top. I'd love butler but doubt the bulls would part with him. I'd be intrigued with a deal centered around Nikola Mirotic. He hasn't done much but is only 23 and could be a nice building block.

Sent from my SM-G900V using RealGM Forums mobile app


It makes no sense to trade Goran for a raw rookie.
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread: Two drink minimum 

Post#242 » by WeekapaugGroove » Fri Nov 21, 2014 4:48 pm

JDLAW wrote:
WeekapaugGroove wrote:I love Goran but I think it could make sense to deal him. Chicago seems like a decent trade partner because he could put them over the top. I'd love butler but doubt the bulls would part with him. I'd be intrigued with a deal centered around Nikola Mirotic. He hasn't done much but is only 23 and could be a nice building block.

Sent from my SM-G900V using RealGM Forums mobile app


It makes no sense to trade Goran for a raw rookie.
well that just depends where this team is in a month or two. It's gonna be hard to make the playoffs out west so if the suns are sitting on the outside looking in come the Allstar break it might make perfect sense to trade Goran for a rookie. This suns roster is a work in progress. I'm not saying they should tank or anything but they do need to be think more about the future than the present in any move they make. Worst outcome would be finishing 9th or 10th out west and having Goran walk for nothing this summer. That's just poor asset management.

Sent from my SM-G900V using RealGM Forums mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
User avatar
RedIndian
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,450
And1: 2,010
Joined: May 23, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread: Two drink minimum 

Post#243 » by RedIndian » Fri Nov 21, 2014 5:05 pm

Would anyone do the following?

Plumlee
Green
Ennis

for

Henson
Ilyasova

Henson's upside is much higher than Plumlee's and Ilyasova could be the stretch 4 that Dragic needs to flourish. Both players' stock is low with the Bucks and I think this is very doable.

I'd then start with:

Henson
Ilyasova
Tucker
Dragic
Bledsoe

With Len, Kieff, Marcus, Warren and Isiah off the bench. Swap Len for Henson if needed. Think that brings much more balance to the rotation. Staring line-up suits Dragic and Bledsoe more, and the bench is really strong.
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread: Two drink minimum 

Post#244 » by WeekapaugGroove » Fri Nov 21, 2014 5:10 pm

RedIndian wrote:Would anyone do the following?

Plumlee
Green
Ennis

for

Henson
Ilyasova

Henson's upside is much higher than Plumlee's and Ilyasova could be the stretch 4 that Dragic needs to flourish. Both players' stock is low with the Bucks and I think this is very doable.

I'd then start with:

Henson
Ilyasova
Tucker
Dragic
Bledsoe

With Len, Kieff, Marcus, Warren and Isiah off the bench. Swap Len for Henson if needed. Think that brings much more balance to the rotation. Staring line-up suits Dragic and Bledsoe more, and the bench is really strong.
I wouldn't. Bucks and suns are my two favorite teams so have tried to think of deals that could benefit both but this isn't one of them. I don't love Henson as a prospect and I'm not sure he's an upgrade over plumlee. Illysova is bad and owed a ton of money next yr. People call him a stretch 4 but the last 2 yrs he's shot under 30% from 3 and in his 7 yr career he's only shot decent from 3 twice and even this yrs he only made about 1 a game. No thanks

Sent from my SM-G900V using RealGM Forums mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
JDLAW
Suns Forum CBA and Legal Expert
Posts: 2,509
And1: 1,301
Joined: May 08, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread: Two drink minimum 

Post#245 » by JDLAW » Fri Nov 21, 2014 5:36 pm

RedIndian wrote:Would anyone do the following?

Plumlee
Green
Ennis

for

Henson
Ilyasova

Henson's upside is much higher than Plumlee's and Ilyasova could be the stretch 4 that Dragic needs to flourish. Both players' stock is low with the Bucks and I think this is very doable.

I'd then start with:

Henson
Ilyasova
Tucker
Dragic
Bledsoe

With Len, Kieff, Marcus, Warren and Isiah off the bench. Swap Len for Henson if needed. Think that brings much more balance to the rotation. Staring line-up suits Dragic and Bledsoe more, and the bench is really strong.


NO!
User avatar
aIvin adams
Analyst
Posts: 3,042
And1: 1,977
Joined: Jun 24, 2009
   

Re: Official Trade Thread: Two drink minimum 

Post#246 » by aIvin adams » Fri Nov 21, 2014 5:49 pm

bledsoe and a gameworn matrix jersey for kyrie irving
JDLAW
Suns Forum CBA and Legal Expert
Posts: 2,509
And1: 1,301
Joined: May 08, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread: Two drink minimum 

Post#247 » by JDLAW » Fri Nov 21, 2014 5:54 pm

WeekapaugGroove wrote:
JDLAW wrote:
WeekapaugGroove wrote:I love Goran but I think it could make sense to deal him. Chicago seems like a decent trade partner because he could put them over the top. I'd love butler but doubt the bulls would part with him. I'd be intrigued with a deal centered around Nikola Mirotic. He hasn't done much but is only 23 and could be a nice building block.

Sent from my SM-G900V using RealGM Forums mobile app


It makes no sense to trade Goran for a raw rookie.
well that just depends where this team is in a month or two. It's gonna be hard to make the playoffs out west so if the suns are sitting on the outside looking in come the Allstar break it might make perfect sense to trade Goran for a rookie. This suns roster is a work in progress. I'm not saying they should tank or anything but they do need to be think more about the future than the present in any move they make. Worst outcome would be finishing 9th or 10th out west and having Goran walk for nothing this summer. That's just poor asset management.

Sent from my SM-G900V using RealGM Forums mobile app


Regardless of what Devaney and his "league sources" say, Goran is not going to walk. The Suns are going to make their best and most popular and most marketable player happy with a new contract.

They are not about to trade Dragic for an unproven rookie reserve.

This is not about asset management, it is about building a winning and contending team. Trading Dragic for what you suggest does not move the team toward that goal.
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread: Two drink minimum 

Post#248 » by WeekapaugGroove » Fri Nov 21, 2014 6:06 pm

JDLAW wrote:
WeekapaugGroove wrote:
JDLAW wrote:
It makes no sense to trade Goran for a raw rookie.
well that just depends where this team is in a month or two. It's gonna be hard to make the playoffs out west so if the suns are sitting on the outside looking in come the Allstar break it might make perfect sense to trade Goran for a rookie. This suns roster is a work in progress. I'm not saying they should tank or anything but they do need to be think more about the future than the present in any move they make. Worst outcome would be finishing 9th or 10th out west and having Goran walk for nothing this summer. That's just poor asset management.

Sent from my SM-G900V using RealGM Forums mobile app


Regardless of what Devaney and his "league sources" say, Goran is not going to walk. The Suns are going to make their best and most popular and most marketable player happy with a new contract.

They are not about to trade Dragic for an unproven rookie reserve.

This is not about asset management, it is about building a winning and contending team. Trading Dragic for what you suggest does not move the team toward that goal.


First off I want to clarify that if I was forced to bet on it right now I would say Goran resigns and is back. But; I don't think its as sure of a thing as you seem to believe. He's going to be an unrestricted FA and none of us know what type of deal the suns front office is comfortable giving him. Some people here were so sure Fry would be back this year and look what happened.


Building a winning and more importantly a contending team IS about asset management. This front office thinks long term; it's why they traded Gortat after deciding they didn't want to pay him what he was going to want in FA. It's why they didn't trade a pick for Gasol or some other vet to try to boost them into the playoffs last trade deadline or trade a 1st for a role player at the draft. Again; I think/hope Goran will be back but I do truly believe that if McD thinks trading him will help this team win a chip in a couple years he'll get moved even though he's a fan favorite.

Also i wasn't suggesting trading him straight up for Mirotic. it would be part of a bigger deal. But I stand by my belief that Mirotic could be a core piece moving forward. Big men with his skill set are rare.
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
Revived
RealGM
Posts: 37,485
And1: 22,251
Joined: Feb 17, 2011

Re: Official Trade Thread: Two drink minimum 

Post#249 » by Revived » Fri Nov 21, 2014 6:07 pm

JDLAW wrote:
WeekapaugGroove wrote:
JDLAW wrote:
It makes no sense to trade Goran for a raw rookie.
well that just depends where this team is in a month or two. It's gonna be hard to make the playoffs out west so if the suns are sitting on the outside looking in come the Allstar break it might make perfect sense to trade Goran for a rookie. This suns roster is a work in progress. I'm not saying they should tank or anything but they do need to be think more about the future than the present in any move they make. Worst outcome would be finishing 9th or 10th out west and having Goran walk for nothing this summer. That's just poor asset management.

Sent from my SM-G900V using RealGM Forums mobile app


Regardless of what Devaney and his "league sources" say, Goran is not going to walk. The Suns are going to make their best and most popular and most marketable player happy with a new contract.

They are not about to trade Dragic for an unproven rookie reserve.

This is not about asset management, it is about building a winning and contending team. Trading Dragic for what you suggest does not move the team toward that goal.

I'm with you on that we should keep him here but I gurantee you that he will sign elsewhere if we continue with the 500 PG lineup.

He said it best, 3 PGs and one ball. It's common sense.
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread: Two drink minimum 

Post#250 » by WeekapaugGroove » Fri Nov 21, 2014 6:10 pm

Plus with the salary cap about to explode some team could throw a max deal at Goran. Don't for a second believe he's going to leave money on the table to stay with the suns; that type of stuff just doesn't happen.
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
User avatar
RedIndian
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,450
And1: 2,010
Joined: May 23, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread: Two drink minimum 

Post#251 » by RedIndian » Fri Nov 21, 2014 6:19 pm

WeekapaugGroove wrote:
RedIndian wrote:Would anyone do the following?

Plumlee
Green
Ennis

for

Henson
Ilyasova

Henson's upside is much higher than Plumlee's and Ilyasova could be the stretch 4 that Dragic needs to flourish. Both players' stock is low with the Bucks and I think this is very doable.

I'd then start with:

Henson
Ilyasova
Tucker
Dragic
Bledsoe

With Len, Kieff, Marcus, Warren and Isiah off the bench. Swap Len for Henson if needed. Think that brings much more balance to the rotation. Staring line-up suits Dragic and Bledsoe more, and the bench is really strong.
I wouldn't. Bucks and suns are my two favorite teams so have tried to think of deals that could benefit both but this isn't one of them. I don't love Henson as a prospect and I'm not sure he's an upgrade over plumlee. Illysova is bad and owed a ton of money next yr. People call him a stretch 4 but the last 2 yrs he's shot under 30% from 3 and in his 7 yr career he's only shot decent from 3 twice and even this yrs he only made about 1 a game. No thanks

Sent from my SM-G900V using RealGM Forums mobile app

Hmm, I hear you. But my two cents - Ersan is owed $7.9 mil next year. If he reproduces his 2011-12 and 2012-13 numbers (13 ppg, 8 rpg with 45% from 3PT), I think that's worth the benefit it'll bring to our guards. Those are better numbers than Frye's. Ersan's been in the doghouse at Milwaukee since last season, but I suspect he'll thrive here with Bledsoe and Dragic dishing to him. He isn't a spectacular defender, but does have decent length, and is a very solid rebounder.

Re: Henson, I thought Bucks fan were pretty high on how he began last season (think he was averaging 15-8 for the first half of the season). I think he has the potential to be a poor man's Anthony Davis. He's supremely long, has soft hands and is a very good shot blocker. I do see him as an upgrade on Plumlee.
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread: Two drink minimum 

Post#252 » by WeekapaugGroove » Fri Nov 21, 2014 6:27 pm

RedIndian wrote:
WeekapaugGroove wrote:
RedIndian wrote:Would anyone do the following?

Plumlee
Green
Ennis

for

Henson
Ilyasova

Henson's upside is much higher than Plumlee's and Ilyasova could be the stretch 4 that Dragic needs to flourish. Both players' stock is low with the Bucks and I think this is very doable.

I'd then start with:

Henson
Ilyasova
Tucker
Dragic
Bledsoe

With Len, Kieff, Marcus, Warren and Isiah off the bench. Swap Len for Henson if needed. Think that brings much more balance to the rotation. Staring line-up suits Dragic and Bledsoe more, and the bench is really strong.
I wouldn't. Bucks and suns are my two favorite teams so have tried to think of deals that could benefit both but this isn't one of them. I don't love Henson as a prospect and I'm not sure he's an upgrade over plumlee. Illysova is bad and owed a ton of money next yr. People call him a stretch 4 but the last 2 yrs he's shot under 30% from 3 and in his 7 yr career he's only shot decent from 3 twice and even this yrs he only made about 1 a game. No thanks

Sent from my SM-G900V using RealGM Forums mobile app

Hmm, I hear you. But my two cents - Ersan is owed $7.9 mil next year. If he reproduces his 2011-12 and 2012-13 numbers (13 ppg, 8 rpg with 45% from 3PT), I think that's worth the benefit it'll bring to our guards. Those are better numbers than Frye's. Ersan's been in the doghouse at Milwaukee since last season, but I suspect he'll thrive here with Bledsoe and Dragic dishing to him. He isn't a spectacular defender, but does have decent length, and is a very solid rebounder.

Re: Henson, I thought Bucks fan were pretty high on how he began last season (think he was averaging 15-8 for the first half of the season). I think he has the potential to be a poor man's Anthony Davis. He's supremely long, has soft hands and is a very good shot blocker. I do see him as an upgrade on Plumlee.


With Ersan I guess it comes down to if you believe the two good years (1 1/2 really because he sucked to start 2012) are what he is or were a fluke. He shot over 40% from 3 those years but only took about 2 a game. Theres also a pretty common belief he's really 2-3 years older than is listed so he's really around 30 and not 27.

Henson is hard to judge. he's had some huge stat games and is incredibly long. But he's not a smart defender and is so skinny he gets bullied in the post. He's got some post offense but is useless outside of 5 feet and can't hit free throws. I don't fault you for liking him more than I do; he's one of those players who some of his good skills are intriguing but my personal opinion is the bad things he does out way the good.
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
Zelaznyrules
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,776
And1: 995
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
     

Re: Official Trade Thread: Two drink minimum 

Post#253 » by Zelaznyrules » Fri Nov 21, 2014 7:08 pm

aIvin adams wrote:bledsoe and a gameworn matrix jersey for kyrie irving


If we absolutely had to make a trade limited to these three assets, I'd trade Bledsoe for the game worn Matrix jersey and just say no thanks to Irving. I want no part of Kyrie or his absurd contract. He has some value as a player, roughly akin to that of Isaiah Thomas. Or did you mean to put your comment in green?
JDLAW
Suns Forum CBA and Legal Expert
Posts: 2,509
And1: 1,301
Joined: May 08, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread: Two drink minimum 

Post#254 » by JDLAW » Fri Nov 21, 2014 7:11 pm

SF88 wrote:I'm with you on that we should keep him here but I gurantee you that he will sign elsewhere if we continue with the 500 PG lineup.

He said it best, 3 PGs and one ball. It's common sense.


Understand your concern, but he is at the top of the heap with respect to the Suns guards. The teams that might go after him NY, LAL, HOU are all less desirable locations for Dragic. In NY Jackson/Fisher run the triangle and do not favor point guards. The Lakers seldom take the ball out of Kobe's hands and the same is true for the Rockets and Harden.

WeekapaugGroove wrote:First off I want to clarify that if I was forced to bet on it right now I would say Goran resigns and is back. But; I don't think its as sure of a thing as you seem to believe. He's going to be an unrestricted FA and none of us know what type of deal the suns front office is comfortable giving him. Some people here were so sure Fry would be back this year and look what happened.


The Suns have already stated they have plenty of money (max if necessary) and years (5 if necessary) to keep him. They can pay him more and for longer. Moreover, he has roots (wife and children and brother) here. He is not going anywhere.

WeekapaugGroove wrote:Building a winning and more importantly a contending team IS about asset management. This front office thinks long term; it's why they traded Gortat after deciding they didn't want to pay him what he was going to want in FA. It's why they didn't trade a pick for Gasol or some other vet to try to boost them into the playoffs last trade deadline or trade a 1st for a role player at the draft. Again; I think/hope Goran will be back but I do truly believe that if McD thinks trading him will help this team win a chip in a couple years he'll get moved even though he's a fan favorite.

Also i wasn't suggesting trading him straight up for Mirotic. it would be part of a bigger deal. But I stand by my belief that Mirotic could be a core piece moving forward. Big men with his skill set are rare.


"Asset management" is nonsense. It is the type of thinking that causes teams to send high-end players who are slated to be free agents away in bad trades for crumbs so they do not lose "assets." Have the Spurs done this "asset management" with any of their core players? No! The make their players feel wanted and a part of the organization - even to the point that the players do not press management for the maximum amount of money they could get on the open market. We talk about emulating the Spurs and how they run their team all the time. Time to put that into practice.

I do not think the decision to trade a core player is solely McD's. The Suns still have a consensus model in place and I seriously doubt Sarver and Babby would agree to trade Dragic for a raw bench player in Mitroic and other scraps Chicago could send our way.

As for Mitroic - he is a 6"10" 220lb power forward. Same height as Markieff and about 25 lbs lighter. I have seen him play a couple of times in the regular season and do not see any thing special about him at this time (<40% from the field and 33% from 3pt) that would make me send the Suns most popular and best player for him. Maybe he has the skills you gush over, but he has not demonstrated them.
User avatar
Christine-In-AZ
Starter
Posts: 2,423
And1: 1,539
Joined: Nov 27, 2007

Re: Official Trade Thread: Two drink minimum 

Post#255 » by Christine-In-AZ » Fri Nov 21, 2014 7:17 pm

JDLAW wrote:Regardless of what Devaney and his "league sources" say, Goran is not going to walk. The Suns are going to make their best and most popular and most marketable player happy with a new contract.

They are not about to trade Dragic for an unproven rookie reserve.

This is not about asset management, it is about building a winning and contending team. Trading Dragic for what you suggest does not move the team toward that goal.


OT, but I'm interested in your opinion:

With the Suns payroll rising to at least 70m next season after Goran's resign/draft pick signing(s) and before resigning Green, what do you think the FO's plans are for G.Green? Shop 'em before the deadline or commit to a resigning effort?

If you don't mind opining...What do you think is the best "Green Plan" for the Suns long term?
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread: Two drink minimum 

Post#256 » by WeekapaugGroove » Fri Nov 21, 2014 7:25 pm

Actually the spurs made a pure asset management trade with one of pops favorite players when they sent George hill to Indiana for Leonard. They knew they didn't want to pay him what he wanted on an extension and traded him for an unproven piece in Leonard. And they nearly traded Tony parker early in his career.

Again I think dragic will be back but to think it's some sure thing is crazy. It's also crazy to think this roster is a finished product; suns are only a little over a yr into a rebuild. Moves will be made.

Miroik is 10 games into his NBA career so judging him by that is premature. There a reason he was considered a big time prospect.
Sent from my SM-G900V using RealGM Forums mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
JDLAW
Suns Forum CBA and Legal Expert
Posts: 2,509
And1: 1,301
Joined: May 08, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread: Two drink minimum 

Post#257 » by JDLAW » Fri Nov 21, 2014 7:35 pm

ChrisInAZ wrote:
JDLAW wrote:Regardless of what Devaney and his "league sources" say, Goran is not going to walk. The Suns are going to make their best and most popular and most marketable player happy with a new contract.

They are not about to trade Dragic for an unproven rookie reserve.

This is not about asset management, it is about building a winning and contending team. Trading Dragic for what you suggest does not move the team toward that goal.


OT, but I'm interested in your opinion:

With the Suns payroll rising to at least 70m next season after Goran's resign/draft pick signing(s) and before resigning Green, what do you think the FO's plans are for G.Green? Shop 'em before the deadline or commit to a resigning effort?

If you don't mind opining...What do you think is the best "Green Plan" for the Suns long term?


I think they are going to try to resign him, but there will be a limit as to what they pay. I think they have already talked to his agent(s) and to him about their intentions. They like Green and what he brings to the table.

The Suns have several advantages with Green. 1) He likes it here and he likes Hornacek and McD, 2)They own bird rights, 3) Green went through the "grass is greener" approach before and it backfired. He had a very good seasoning NJ and then signed with the Pacers where he was lost and forgotten.

I think the Suns sign both Green and Dragic (whose cap hold will be substantially less than his ultimate salary) and sort out the log jam with an appropriate trade. I think the guy who ultimately gets traded is Thomas because the Suns will have a capable back-up and Thomas can be dealt to any team because his salary is low ($7M) and it would seem he would want to play for a team where he could start (HOU, Miami, Mil, Det,Indy).
NavLDO
Suns Forum Defensive Player of the Year
Posts: 2,749
And1: 1,436
Joined: Aug 25, 2014
     

Re: Official Trade Thread: Two drink minimum 

Post#258 » by NavLDO » Fri Nov 21, 2014 7:43 pm

I'd really like to see how Len and Warren pan out before making any major trades. It's entirely possible Len and Warren develop into All-Star type players. Not a given, for sure, but if they did become at least borderline stars, similar to Dragic's year last year, I'd have a hard time believing we wouldn't be a solid 4-5 seed by the end of next season.

EB
Dragic
Warren
Kieff
Len

If we had 4 borderline stars and a decent starting PF in Kieff, I think we are in good shape.

But I wouldn't mind trading one or two of PJ, IT, Ennis to make some room. Plus, Goodwin may figure it out by next season as well, so we'd have a bench of, assuming Green is gone...

IT or Ennis
Goodwin
Marcus
?
Plumlee

So, I guess what I'm saying is we might already have the major pieces, we just need some time.

And I don't get all the talk of trading the Morri. They are on a very reasonable deal. Now, if they net us a proven, or even young up and coming, star, then sure, but I honestly feel like Kieff gets seriously underrated on this board, and we can't have stars at every position, but I think we could very well be close to having 4 stars on the team, if we just give it some time...heck, Ennis might turn out to be a great PG, and we still have the rights to Bogdan, so he may come over and be a stud at the 2.

I think we stay put unless McD can finagle some type of great deal at the deadline for a stud PF.
User avatar
Christine-In-AZ
Starter
Posts: 2,423
And1: 1,539
Joined: Nov 27, 2007

Re: Official Trade Thread: Two drink minimum 

Post#259 » by Christine-In-AZ » Fri Nov 21, 2014 7:53 pm

JDLAW wrote:
ChrisInAZ wrote:
JDLAW wrote:Regardless of what Devaney and his "league sources" say, Goran is not going to walk. The Suns are going to make their best and most popular and most marketable player happy with a new contract.

They are not about to trade Dragic for an unproven rookie reserve.

This is not about asset management, it is about building a winning and contending team. Trading Dragic for what you suggest does not move the team toward that goal.


OT, but I'm interested in your opinion:

With the Suns payroll rising to at least 70m next season after Goran's resign/draft pick signing(s) and before resigning Green, what do you think the FO's plans are for G.Green? Shop 'em before the deadline or commit to a resigning effort?

If you don't mind opining...What do you think is the best "Green Plan" for the Suns long term?


I think they are going to try to resign him, but there will be a limit as to what they pay. I think they have already talked to his agent(s) and to him about their intentions. They like Green and what he brings to the table.

The Suns have several advantages with Green. 1) He likes it here and he likes Hornacek and McD, 2)They own bird rights, 3) Green went through the "grass is greener" approach before and it backfired. He had a very good seasoning NJ and then signed with the Pacers where he was lost and forgotten.

I think the Suns sign both Green and Dragic (whose cap hold will be substantially less than his ultimate salary) and sort out the log jam with an appropriate trade. I think the guy who ultimately gets traded is Thomas because the Suns will have a capable back-up and Thomas can be dealt to any team because his salary is low ($7M) and it would seem he would want to play for a team where he could start (HOU, Miami, Mil, Det,Indy).


Is this anywhere close to correct...

Projecting 2015-16 Suns payroll
(Contractual obligations plus Dragic and Green resigned)

G Bledsoe- 13.5
G Dragic-15?
G Green- 7?
G Thomas- 7

F Tucker- 5.5
F Mook- 5
F TJ Warren- 2

G Z.Dragic- 1.8
G Ennis- 1.7
G Goodwin- 1.2

PF Keef- 8
C Len- 3.8
C Plumlee- 2.1


Total $$= 59.7M for positions 1,2 and 3
Total$$= 14.9M for positions 4 and 5

With above numbers I have the Suns payroll at 74.6 million before signing the 2015 draft pick(s). This would represent roughly a 15 million dollar rise from '14-'15's "number".

If the Suns do ok this year...say? Get 50 wins/8th seed and give SAS or MEM a hard fought 6 game series, will Sarver be cool with a payroll approaching 80 million next year? He's still not selling out the arena with this group, and how much excitement will there be if the team remains nearly intact?
User avatar
aIvin adams
Analyst
Posts: 3,042
And1: 1,977
Joined: Jun 24, 2009
   

Re: Official Trade Thread: Two drink minimum 

Post#260 » by aIvin adams » Fri Nov 21, 2014 7:54 pm

Zelaznyrules wrote:
aIvin adams wrote:bledsoe and a gameworn matrix jersey for kyrie irving


If we absolutely had to make a trade limited to these three assets, I'd trade Bledsoe for the game worn Matrix jersey and just say no thanks to Irving. I want no part of Kyrie or his absurd contract. He has some value as a player, roughly akin to that of Isaiah Thomas. Or did you mean to put your comment in green?


nah i'd trade bledsoe for irving. i like bledsoe and his contract is nice but u gotta roll the dice sometimes. irving is really good

Return to Phoenix Suns