nevetsov wrote:Weren't you just saying that Golden State were statistically better when Bogut was on the bench? But now you say that they relied on him?
Is that what I said? I'm pretty sure I said that they kicked @$$ like this: Curry-Klay-Barnes-Iggy-Draymond, but they hesitated to use that because it's outside-the-box. But they also kicked @$$ like this: Curry-Klay-Barnes-Draymond-Bogut.
Shocker of shockers: both things are true!!! Both styles were important to winning a title. I'd put Bogut as about the 4th or 5th most important player to winning their title. So yeah, they "relied" on him.
I HIGHLY value defensive frontcourts. I also HIGHLY value spacing. Those two things are not mutually exclusive...but it's difficult to do both well. GS straddled that line brilliantly.
You know what wasn't important to winning a title? David Lee-Bogut frontcourts.
nevetsov wrote:And for every Curry, Nash and Griffin, the Knicks will raise you Amare, the Suns Penny Hardaway... Baron Davis, Arenas... Miami took a risk on Oden... Timberwolves with Brandon Roy... Just off the top of my head. I'm sure the list is much longer than my memory suggests.
Agree to...agree. It's not black-and-white. I don't think anything I wrote suggested otherwise.
I'd just emphasize, though, that "has had injury problems" is not the same thing as "has no cartilage in his knees".