jredsaz wrote:
I'm sorry buddy but he understands them fine. That's the point. The cap is based off of the the players take from the total revenue generated by the league. Stars should make more because they generate money for the league. Players are the reason there is television money. TV money paces the value the franchises.
Any system that Max's out LBJ at $20 Mil/year is laughable. Moreover, the assumption that these guys make enough money because they make a lot of money in nonsense.
No, Stein really doesn't, but that's kind of besides the point.
I agree with you that LeBron should make more money because you can't put a price on his talents. But if you want some kind of parity in the league, you can't really just continue to raise the cap to epic proportions so the very best guys can make what they are worth.
There really should be another way for these guys to get paid. Perhaps it is jersey sale payouts.....players get a huge commission on their personal jersey sales from the league to help compensate them for making the league so valuable as a whole. This is just a quick idea, but other ways to properly compensate the players who are REALLY helping the league and some teams make money.
Another one could be a back end cut from the owners profit each year...if you were a star for a team who sells out every game, sells tons of merchandise, hosts 16 playoff games and makes the owner a bunch, you get a percentage of the profits at the end....or even a whole team gets a percentage based on their salaries. (I know they already have something somewhat similar to this in place where players get a certain % of BRI (basketball related income) so if the league and teams make more, it gets divided among the players anyway).
I think an innovative approach to this would work out well. But to increase the cap and max salaries to enable the best players to make what they want or are perhaps worth is only going to help out big markets and create more superteams and the small markets would get crushed.















