ImageImageImage

2017 Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez

BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 15,353
And1: 8,997
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: 2017 Offseason Speculation, Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 

Post#261 » by BobbieL » Fri Jun 2, 2017 2:03 pm

Blonde wrote:I don't mind the idea of adding Russell, but I wouldn't give up the #4 pick to get it done. I would approve of a 3-way that sent Bledsoe out (Orlando, NY, Dallas), their pick to LA, and Russell to us. It would depend who is still available, but I don't mind the fit. Russell's current defense is not ideal, but he has the ability to be a great passer and shooter from deep, with potential on the defensive end. If we got Jackson at 4 I would not be upset with a deal like this.


This probably makes the most sense when trading Bledsoe - getting back a player but not a draft pick.

The Suns have enough young players - I don't think they need another 10 for Bledsoe or 12 for warren - I think they need to start figuring out how to find a veteran so they push for the playoffs. Sarver said the goal was to compete in 2020 - I took that compete for a top 4 seed in the West and not compete for the 8th spot in the West

If you want to compete in the West - you need to start making the playoffs this coming year

Trading Bledsoe for a draft pick slow down the process -even Fultz or Ball. Now Russell, coming into his third year, might be pretty solid. And he is not needed with Ball

Actually think if you could do a three way, using Bledsoe to get a pick to get Russell, Suns have the nucleus to move forward.
User avatar
Ghost of Kleine
Master of Tweets
Posts: 16,517
And1: 9,154
Joined: Apr 13, 2012

Re: 2017 Offseason Speculation, Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 

Post#262 » by Ghost of Kleine » Fri Jun 2, 2017 2:13 pm

BobbieL wrote:
Blonde wrote:I don't mind the idea of adding Russell, but I wouldn't give up the #4 pick to get it done. I would approve of a 3-way that sent Bledsoe out (Orlando, NY, Dallas), their pick to LA, and Russell to us. It would depend who is still available, but I don't mind the fit. Russell's current defense is not ideal, but he has the ability to be a great passer and shooter from deep, with potential on the defensive end. If we got Jackson at 4 I would not be upset with a deal like this.


This probably makes the most sense when trading Bledsoe - getting back a player but not a draft pick.

The Suns have enough young players - I don't think they need another 10 for Bledsoe or 12 for warren - I think they need to start figuring out how to find a veteran so they push for the playoffs. Sarver said the goal was to compete in 2020 - I took that compete for a top 4 seed in the West and not compete for the 8th spot in the West

If you want to compete in the West - you need to start making the playoffs this coming year

Trading Bledsoe for a draft pick slow down the process -even Fultz or Ball. Now Russell, coming into his third year, might be pretty solid. And he is not needed with Ball

Actually think if you could do a three way, using Bledsoe to get a pick to get Russell, Suns have the nucleus to move forward.


I hear what you are saying, But talk of trying to compete post Bledsoe trade? I'm just not sure how viable or realistic that option is, I mean who do we really think we can compete with in the next few years anyhow? Definitely not golden state. Or even Cleveland with Lebron and Irving still. So If we decide to go and start picking up vets just for the sake of making it into the playoffs only to be quickly eliminated by these superteams, Then aren't we really just spinning our wheels yet again and finding ourselves right back on that all too familiar " treadmill of mediocrity"? Don't get me wrong, I want to compete just as bad as anyone else, Just not at the expense of building a "true contender" as opposed to being a playoff punching bag for the current post season juggernauts. :o
Image
BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 15,353
And1: 8,997
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: 2017 Offseason Speculation, Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 

Post#263 » by BobbieL » Fri Jun 2, 2017 2:21 pm

Ghost of Kleine wrote:
BobbieL wrote:
Blonde wrote:I don't mind the idea of adding Russell, but I wouldn't give up the #4 pick to get it done. I would approve of a 3-way that sent Bledsoe out (Orlando, NY, Dallas), their pick to LA, and Russell to us. It would depend who is still available, but I don't mind the fit. Russell's current defense is not ideal, but he has the ability to be a great passer and shooter from deep, with potential on the defensive end. If we got Jackson at 4 I would not be upset with a deal like this.


This probably makes the most sense when trading Bledsoe - getting back a player but not a draft pick.

The Suns have enough young players - I don't think they need another 10 for Bledsoe or 12 for warren - I think they need to start figuring out how to find a veteran so they push for the playoffs. Sarver said the goal was to compete in 2020 - I took that compete for a top 4 seed in the West and not compete for the 8th spot in the West

If you want to compete in the West - you need to start making the playoffs this coming year

Trading Bledsoe for a draft pick slow down the process -even Fultz or Ball. Now Russell, coming into his third year, might be pretty solid. And he is not needed with Ball

Actually think if you could do a three way, using Bledsoe to get a pick to get Russell, Suns have the nucleus to move forward.


I hear what you are saying, But talk of trying to compete post Bledsoe trade? I'm just not sure how viable or realistic that option is, I mean who do we really think we can compete with in the next few years anyhow? Definitely not golden state. Or even Cleveland with Lebron and Irving still. So If we decide to go and start picking up vets just for the sake of making it into the playoffs only to be quickly eliminated by these superteams, Then aren't we really just spinning our wheels yet again and finding ourselves right back on that all too familiar " treadmill of mediocrity"? Don't get me wrong, I want to compete just as bad as anyone else, Just not at the expense of building a "true contender" as opposed to being a playoff punching bag for the current post season juggernauts. :o


You are right - it has to be the right veteran - not Iguodala. Iguodala makes sense for a team that is trying to win -- so possibly the Twolves - probably more than the Suns

By a veteran I mean Paul George or Jimmy Butler -- a veteran, really good player, in his prime

So its tricky you have a soon to be 27 year old Bledsoe with history of knees going into the 4th year of his deal with a much younger team around him. So yes, trading for Russell - I think makes more sense than trading for the 12th pick. As Russell with two years in the league would blend much better with Booker, Bender, Chriss and Warren along with the 4th pick than adding the 10th and 4th pick to that already young nucleus

Its a tricky spot for the Suns but this year needs to show growth.

I do wonder what bad contract the Suns will have to take for Brandon Knight - Luol Deng, Mozgov... ugg its going to not be pretty
Waylay13
Rookie
Posts: 1,166
And1: 940
Joined: Apr 10, 2016
 

Re: 2017 Offseason Speculation, Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 

Post#264 » by Waylay13 » Fri Jun 2, 2017 3:41 pm

If you want a good laugh check this mega trade idea on the 76ers reddit https://www.reddit.com/r/sixers/comments/6eqw0r/sixers_mega_trade/

Personally I think that Suns fans would burn down Talking Stick and every single bank Sarver owns if something like happened.
Just say no to idiots!!
User avatar
Ghost of Kleine
Master of Tweets
Posts: 16,517
And1: 9,154
Joined: Apr 13, 2012

Re: 2017 Offseason Speculation, Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 

Post#265 » by Ghost of Kleine » Fri Jun 2, 2017 4:28 pm

Truly absurd, And I have seen some horrible trades thrown together before. But this is almost comical yet insulting to all parties involved in one way or another! :crazy: :rofl:

Image
Image
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: RE: Re: 2017 Offseason Speculation, Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 

Post#266 » by WeekapaugGroove » Fri Jun 2, 2017 4:47 pm

Ghost of Kleine wrote:Truly absurd, And I have seen some horrible trades thrown together before. But this is almost comical yet insulting to all parties involved in one way or another! :crazy: :rofl:

Image

Yeah that dude needs to put down the blunt and step away from the trade machine for a while.

Sent from my SM-G930V using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
Walt_Uoob
Senior
Posts: 545
And1: 403
Joined: Sep 26, 2014
 

Re: 2017 Offseason Speculation, Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 

Post#267 » by Walt_Uoob » Fri Jun 2, 2017 5:43 pm

I tend to think Booker is overhyped and I'd be willing to entertain trades for him but I laughed out loud at that one too!
Zelaznyrules
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,776
And1: 995
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
     

Re: 2017 Offseason Speculation, Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 

Post#268 » by Zelaznyrules » Fri Jun 2, 2017 6:17 pm

Waylay13 wrote:
Damkac wrote:Why everybody wants to trade Warren? :banghead:


Personally I have one person that I am focused on the Suns getting and that is Josh Jackson. I would rather turn Warren into a super 6th man and have him doing the scoring off the bench. I think that is his natural role. With Len becoming a RFA and his lack of production i could see the Suns thinking about making a trade to pick up a player that could replace Len and that is Zack Collins but he isnt worth the 4th pick but he might be worth trading a player like Warren to get.


I see that suggested often and I just don't get it. In the NBA he seems destined to be a secondary scorer. Perhaps, one day, a great secondary scorer but I just don't see him as the guy who can consistently get it done as a 6th man. I could see him coming off the bench but I could never see him as the primary scorer that your 6th man typically is. But all that said, I think there's a very good chance that Jackson never becomes the equal of Warren today and TJ still has heights to reach IMO.

IMO you draft Jackson if you really feel he's the best player available but don't draft him to replace Warren as there is no need to do so.
User avatar
RaisingArizona
RealGM
Posts: 15,805
And1: 7,690
Joined: Apr 23, 2009
 

Re: 2017 Offseason Speculation, Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 

Post#269 » by RaisingArizona » Fri Jun 2, 2017 6:28 pm

Lol at trading Booker, Chriss and Bender. Not gonna happen
Image
ImNotMcDiSwear
General Manager
Posts: 8,297
And1: 6,435
Joined: Dec 14, 2013
 

Re: 2017 Offseason Speculation, Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 

Post#270 » by ImNotMcDiSwear » Fri Jun 2, 2017 6:54 pm

ginobiliflops wrote:Lol at trading Booker, Chriss and Bender. Not gonna happen


It seems like fans and media are, fairly consistently, simultaneously, trashing, and proposing to trade for, our young players. It's like they're all imagining Sarver up and firing McD and hiring Isiah Thomas as GM.

Our local media isn't much better about Dragan. Youngest player in the draft? Why not 20/10/5 first season? :roll:
Waylay13
Rookie
Posts: 1,166
And1: 940
Joined: Apr 10, 2016
 

Re: 2017 Offseason Speculation, Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 

Post#271 » by Waylay13 » Fri Jun 2, 2017 7:15 pm

Zelaznyrules wrote:I see that suggested often and I just don't get it. In the NBA he seems destined to be a secondary scorer. Perhaps, one day, a great secondary scorer but I just don't see him as the guy who can consistently get it done as a 6th man. I could see him coming off the bench but I could never see him as the primary scorer that your 6th man typically is. But all that said, I think there's a very good chance that Jackson never becomes the equal of Warren today and TJ still has heights to reach IMO.

IMO you draft Jackson if you really feel he's the best player available but don't draft him to replace Warren as there is no need to do so.


If you are only looking at scoring then maybe Jackson doesnt become the equal of Warren but when you add the defensive, ability to run the floor and passing Jackson will be better then Warren from the moment he is drafted. If his shot is fixable he will out shine Warren like the sun does the moon. Warren is a good mid range scorer, a good rebounder for his position and an OK defender. Jackson is a good scorer with the way that he runs the floor and hustles, a good rebounder, a very good defender, a very good passer for his position. Most of the experts say that if Jackson's shot can be fixed he is the second and maybe most talented play in the draft. TJ heights will always be able scoring JJ is about can he be the defensive transformer that helps turn this teams defense around.
Just say no to idiots!!
User avatar
RaisingArizona
RealGM
Posts: 15,805
And1: 7,690
Joined: Apr 23, 2009
 

Re: RE: Re: 2017 Offseason Speculation, Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 

Post#272 » by RaisingArizona » Fri Jun 2, 2017 7:38 pm

cosmofizzo wrote:
ginobiliflops wrote:Lol at trading Booker, Chriss and Bender. Not gonna happen


It seems like fans and media are, fairly consistently, simultaneously, trashing, and proposing to trade for, our young players. It's like they're all imagining Sarver up and firing McD and hiring Isiah Thomas as GM.

Our local media isn't much better about Dragan. Youngest player in the draft? Why not 20/10/5 first season? :roll:

I have realized that. A ton of casual NBA writers out there who only cover the big markets who don't know what they're talking about. It makes it hard to take them seriously about anything. Perception matters too; the Suns have been bad for awhile so these writers assume our guys are all trash and our FO will continue to make bad decisions.
Image
JJ13
Rookie
Posts: 1,158
And1: 490
Joined: Jul 18, 2005

Re: 2017 Offseason Speculation, Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 

Post#273 » by JJ13 » Fri Jun 2, 2017 7:39 pm

#4+TJ+Len (sign/trade) for Klay Thompson

Bled/
Booker
Klay
Chriss
Chandler/FA
Saberestar
RealGM
Posts: 22,599
And1: 17,199
Joined: May 21, 2010

Re: 2017 Offseason Speculation, Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 

Post#274 » by Saberestar » Fri Jun 2, 2017 8:03 pm

JJ13 wrote:#4+TJ+Len (sign/trade) for Klay Thompson

Bled/
Booker
Klay
Chriss
Chandler/FA

Klay Thompson traded? No way.
User avatar
RaisingArizona
RealGM
Posts: 15,805
And1: 7,690
Joined: Apr 23, 2009
 

Re: RE: Re: 2017 Offseason Speculation, Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 

Post#275 » by RaisingArizona » Fri Jun 2, 2017 8:07 pm

Saberestar wrote:
JJ13 wrote:#4+TJ+Len (sign/trade) for Klay Thompson

Bled/
Booker
Klay
Chriss
Chandler/FA

Klay Thompson traded? No way.

Haha why would GSW break up the most stacked team of all time?
Image
JJ13
Rookie
Posts: 1,158
And1: 490
Joined: Jul 18, 2005

Re: RE: Re: 2017 Offseason Speculation, Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 

Post#276 » by JJ13 » Fri Jun 2, 2017 8:44 pm

ginobiliflops wrote:
Saberestar wrote:
JJ13 wrote:#4+TJ+Len (sign/trade) for Klay Thompson

Bled/
Booker
Klay
Chriss
Chandler/FA

Klay Thompson traded? No way.

Haha why would GSW break up the most stacked team of all time?


I can't be the only one reading the tea leaves here, can I? Lots of people talking about Klay being traded. Didn't RealGM even post an article about GS paying close to $300MM in a couple years?
User avatar
RaisingArizona
RealGM
Posts: 15,805
And1: 7,690
Joined: Apr 23, 2009
 

Re: RE: Re: 2017 Offseason Speculation, Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 

Post#277 » by RaisingArizona » Fri Jun 2, 2017 11:27 pm

JJ13 wrote:
ginobiliflops wrote:
Saberestar wrote:Klay Thompson traded? No way.

Haha why would GSW break up the most stacked team of all time?


I can't be the only one reading the tea leaves here, can I? Lots of people talking about Klay being traded. Didn't RealGM even post an article about GS paying close to $300MM in a couple years?


I hear you. I guess I'm just skeptical of it actually happening. Would be great to have him and Booker!
Image
User avatar
MrMiyagi
Suns Forum Eternal Optimist
Posts: 8,194
And1: 7,725
Joined: Jan 10, 2010
   

Re: RE: Re: 2017 Offseason Speculation, Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 

Post#278 » by MrMiyagi » Sat Jun 3, 2017 12:45 am

ginobiliflops wrote:
cosmofizzo wrote:
ginobiliflops wrote:Lol at trading Booker, Chriss and Bender. Not gonna happen


It seems like fans and media are, fairly consistently, simultaneously, trashing, and proposing to trade for, our young players. It's like they're all imagining Sarver up and firing McD and hiring Isiah Thomas as GM.

Our local media isn't much better about Dragan. Youngest player in the draft? Why not 20/10/5 first season? :roll:

I have realized that. A ton of casual NBA writers out there who only cover the big markets who don't know what they're talking about. It makes it hard to take them seriously about anything. Perception matters too; the Suns have been bad for awhile so these writers assume our guys are all trash and our FO will continue to make bad decisions.

And next season when we're hovering around .500, people will come out of the woodwork saying "We knew these guys were great, young players!!! It was only a matter of time!!!!"
SHAZAM!

Suns traded Mikal Bridges, Cam Johnson, Jae Crowder and 4 1st round picks and a swap so some Vegas Bookies would like us.
User avatar
thamadkant
Suns Forum Picker of Cherries
Posts: 16,920
And1: 8,605
Joined: Jan 06, 2007
 

Re: 2017 Offseason Speculation, Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 

Post#279 » by thamadkant » Sat Jun 3, 2017 1:17 am

Bledsoe and Pick 4 for Wiggins and a big contract?
carey
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,192
And1: 1,941
Joined: Feb 12, 2009
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
     

Re: RE: Re: 2017 Offseason Speculation, Trade & Free Agency Ideas & Discussion 

Post#280 » by carey » Sat Jun 3, 2017 1:29 am

1UPZ wrote:Bledsoe and Pick 4 for Wiggins and a big contract?

No thank you.

Return to Phoenix Suns