Say hello to the newest sun: Stephen Curry

[wdrummel]

Stephen luv da keeeds!

[ruiner]

Hm. Bucher replied to me again. I didn't see that. I'm organizedchaos_ on there.


There's no way Clark is in the deal. At least he seriously better not be...

[rsavaj]

You guys are going after Lebron. Getting rid of most long term deals, having a young experienced inexpensive core, a good defensive big man who is good at pick and roll and has great hands, and Steph Curry. It's all fitting into place.

hahaha how epic would that be after all of the lebeast to NYK talk

[TASTIC]

Clark's in there!? WTF...Just as Kerr redeems himself he does that

Take Bellinelli out, we don't need him!!

[rsavaj]

Warriors Want Curry More Than Amare?

By Marcus Thompson
Friday, June 26th, 2009 at 1:16 pm in Uncategorized
5 Comments »

I talked with a Warriors insider and it seems the Warriors may be willing to walk away from the Amare Stoudemire deal if it means giving up Stephen Curry.
The press conference to introduce him to local medium is still going on at 2. There are reports that the deal is on hold. Originally, the No. 7 pick was part of the deal. Since it turned out to be Curry, who both teams love, the Warriors don’t want him as part of the deal. Phoenix does.
Why are they putting their foot down on Curry? My guess:
• they are already giving up enough
• Curry is the Monta Ellis insurance they need

Is this all a front, a Chris the Moneymaker type bluff to squeeze more out of the Suns? We will see
Leave a comment

http://www.ibabuzz.com/warriors/

lame....

[jlove_26]

This is all so stupid. GS fans think to highly of curry. If it were up to me I wouldn't trade amare at all. Besides he owns every stupid big man the warriors have. They should be wishing this deal gets done. Amare is a top freakin player in the whole NBA.

There are plenty of us in the Bay praying they make it official. For most of the year people came up with very similar trades to Biedrins/Monta + Wright + one of our SGs + 1st pick for Bosh or Amare and now that it might happen people are freaking.

What's been the word on Amare's eye this summer? i saw in one place that he wouldn't play bball again or that he'll never be the same. I assume that's not true but is it pretty bad?

He was just cleared last week to resume shooting and practicing. So, for all accounts and purposes, he should be fine. Although, from what he says, he will, from now on and no matter what, will wear goggles. He said that at the beginning of the season after Diaw got his eye, and then decided to not wear them and look what happened. He got hit in the eye again and lost for the season.

[SSOL]

How legit is that Warriors poster? IHG, is Clark in it?

[delsol650]

http://twitter.com/timkawakami

http://twitter.com/gswscribe
Nelson: "We are not trading him (Curry)"
10 minutes ago from mobile web

By Marcus Thompson
Friday, June 26th, 2009 at 1:16 pm in Uncategorized
6 Comments »

I talked with a Warriors insider and it seems the Warriors may be willing to walk away from the Amare Stoudemire deal if it means giving up Stephen Curry.
The press conference to introduce him to local medium is still going on at 2. There are reports that the deal is on hold. Originally, the No. 7 pick was part of the deal. Since it turned out to be Curry, who both teams love, the Warriors don’t want him as part of the deal. Phoenix does.
Why are they putting their foot down on Curry? My guess:
• they are already giving up enough
• Curry is the Monta Ellis insurance they need

Is this all a front, a Chris the Moneymaker type bluff to squeeze more out of the Suns? We will see

[rsavaj]

Clark's in there!? WTF...Just as Kerr redeems himself he does that

Take Bellinelli out, we don't need him!!

YES WE DO!

i need him....

[rly723]

[rsavaj]

GS management is pretty evil if they lie to the children lol

[Stix]

WTF IS GOING ON!?!?!?!?!

[Mr. Sun]

There's no way Clark is in the deal. At least he seriously better not be...

No Clark wouldn't be in the deal. Suns picked him for a specific reason and was never part of the agreement.

[TASTIC]

I'd rather Clark than Bellinelli. we're small enough up front, he has a longer deal and we're guard heavy as it stands now...

[delsol650]

This stale mate will go till Jan8. We'll see who blinks first. All I know is the warriors aren't worried about losing anyone after next year or 2.

[rly723]

WTF IS GOING ON!?!?!?!?!

nothing is.

they want to keep curry

biedrins/wright/belinelli/buke seems fair if amare is unwilling to sign an extension

both teams move onto other deals

i'll even bet that suns will not find a better offer.

acording to a warrior insider on another meesage board, amare was almost headed to cle at the deadline last season for wally and spare parts

[ihateginobili]

I have some very good news. Unfortunately I’m not allowed to post it just yet. But its very good news for the suns, I will leave it at that.

[Gorilla Warfare]

oh you tease! haha

[Captain Klank]

"Breaking News! Amar'e Stoudemire to the Lakers!!"

That's what Amare posted on his twitter.

Coming from a Bulls fan...PLEASE don't be true!

[jlove_26]

WTF IHG? You can't leave us at that.If you have something and can't say anything yet, don't post. It makes us even worse basket cases.