Qwigglez wrote:Oh and this Teague trade rumor. Teague will be expiring after the following season. He'll be 29 next offseason, why would he stay with the Sixers? Unless they offer him the max and there are no other teams coming close to that then I don't see it. The trade doesn't make sense on Philly's side I completely get it for the Hawks though.
Knight fits with the Sixers core, and will still have 4 more years left on his contract. I think Knight + 4 for Okafor is a win-win for both sides.
Personally i think if the debate is Knight/Okafor or Noel vs Teague/Okafor or Noel then the #4 is WAY to much to make up the difference. Yes, when comparing Teague to Knight, Teague may have a edge, but not THAT big of an edge.
Purely in the constraints of a Teague for Noel/Okafor trade, replacing Knight/#4 SHOULD net something along the lines of either Noel/Okafor AND either Saric/Covington.....Use Tucker or our #28 to offset value if needed.
Or for that matter.....Knight/#13 for Okafor/Late First. But in all likelyhood, the end game for the Sixers is the #4. If the Suns went out and traded Knight/#4 for Teague we'd all be crapping bricks for weeks. So why should those two net the same value as Teague in a trade for the same player?