Blonde wrote:Embiid just had zero points in a loss in case anyone was still upset about Booker’s poor outing yesterday
Still beats zero points from Ayton the last 15 games.
Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez

Blonde wrote:Embiid just had zero points in a loss in case anyone was still upset about Booker’s poor outing yesterday

Qwigglez wrote:Blonde wrote:Embiid just had zero points in a loss in case anyone was still upset about Booker’s poor outing yesterday
Still beats zero points from Ayton the last 15 games.
Dual wrote:Bogdanovic and Hield, what a duo of killers...
Qwigglez wrote:Blonde wrote:Embiid just had zero points in a loss in case anyone was still upset about Booker’s poor outing yesterday
Still beats zero points from Ayton the last 15 games.
sunsbg wrote:Qwigglez wrote:Blonde wrote:Embiid just had zero points in a loss in case anyone was still upset about Booker’s poor outing yesterday
Still beats zero points from Ayton the last 15 games.
Embiid looks overweight and injured. I hope Ayton will turn into a better player than him.

bwgood77 wrote:
suns12345 wrote:bwgood77 wrote:
Is that saying Sabonis is a superior defender? if so, that is surprising.
ImNotMcDiSwear wrote:suns12345 wrote:bwgood77 wrote:
Is that saying Sabonis is a superior defender? if so, that is surprising.
IIRC the knock on Sabonis coming out was that he wouldn't be a good defender.
People really don't seem to understand how important size, intelligence and grit are in basketball. You don't need to be able to jump out of the gym or race down the floor to be a great defender.
Man it just sucks being pretty much spot on about the draft year after year and watching our FO trying to outsmart the obvious. I feel like there are a select few posters here who are able to pick out the winners year after year. And it's not hard. Most of it's just looking at the freaking stats!!
suns12345 wrote:ImNotMcDiSwear wrote:suns12345 wrote:
Is that saying Sabonis is a superior defender? if so, that is surprising.
IIRC the knock on Sabonis coming out was that he wouldn't be a good defender.
People really don't seem to understand how important size, intelligence and grit are in basketball. You don't need to be able to jump out of the gym or race down the floor to be a great defender.
Man it just sucks being pretty much spot on about the draft year after year and watching our FO trying to outsmart the obvious. I feel like there are a select few posters here who are able to pick out the winners year after year. And it's not hard. Most of it's just looking at the freaking stats!!
I think you're right. I mentioned this somewhere else, but looking at the stats and making the obvious pick gets you sabonis level players 80-90% of the time (if you know what you're doing)
But picking the diamond in the rough type athletes might net you Giannis or Kawhi etc. (10% of the time) who didn't look amazing coming out but had potential (but for this approach you really have to know what you're doing)
Anyway, those percentages are obviously made up, but I think it comes down to philosophy on drafting on what you want. Build up your team with solid players like sabonis, or try to hit a home run and land a star. Especially when if you are'nt picking #1 or 2 every year (often the #1 and 2 pick combine good stats and athletic potential)
ImNotMcDiSwear wrote:suns12345 wrote:ImNotMcDiSwear wrote:
IIRC the knock on Sabonis coming out was that he wouldn't be a good defender.
People really don't seem to understand how important size, intelligence and grit are in basketball. You don't need to be able to jump out of the gym or race down the floor to be a great defender.
Man it just sucks being pretty much spot on about the draft year after year and watching our FO trying to outsmart the obvious. I feel like there are a select few posters here who are able to pick out the winners year after year. And it's not hard. Most of it's just looking at the freaking stats!!
I think you're right. I mentioned this somewhere else, but looking at the stats and making the obvious pick gets you sabonis level players 80-90% of the time (if you know what you're doing)
But picking the diamond in the rough type athletes might net you Giannis or Kawhi etc. (10% of the time) who didn't look amazing coming out but had potential (but for this approach you really have to know what you're doing)
Anyway, those percentages are obviously made up, but I think it comes down to philosophy on drafting on what you want. Build up your team with solid players like sabonis, or try to hit a home run and land a star. Especially when if you are'nt picking #1 or 2 every year (often the #1 and 2 pick combine good stats and athletic potential)
I don't know what Giannis's stats looked like as an 18YO in Greece, but I know they were better than Bender's in Israel.
Kawhi actually WAS the obvious pick for us in the 2011 Draft based on stats. I remember most of the people on the board I frequented at the time wanted Kawhi. The combination of scoring, rebounding, steals and blocks reminded a lot of us of Marion.
But, yeah, I agree!

ImNotMcDiSwear wrote:suns12345 wrote:ImNotMcDiSwear wrote:
IIRC the knock on Sabonis coming out was that he wouldn't be a good defender.
People really don't seem to understand how important size, intelligence and grit are in basketball. You don't need to be able to jump out of the gym or race down the floor to be a great defender.
Man it just sucks being pretty much spot on about the draft year after year and watching our FO trying to outsmart the obvious. I feel like there are a select few posters here who are able to pick out the winners year after year. And it's not hard. Most of it's just looking at the freaking stats!!
I think you're right. I mentioned this somewhere else, but looking at the stats and making the obvious pick gets you sabonis level players 80-90% of the time (if you know what you're doing)
But picking the diamond in the rough type athletes might net you Giannis or Kawhi etc. (10% of the time) who didn't look amazing coming out but had potential (but for this approach you really have to know what you're doing)
Anyway, those percentages are obviously made up, but I think it comes down to philosophy on drafting on what you want. Build up your team with solid players like sabonis, or try to hit a home run and land a star. Especially when if you are'nt picking #1 or 2 every year (often the #1 and 2 pick combine good stats and athletic potential)
I don't know what Giannis's stats looked like as an 18YO in Greece, but I know they were better than Bender's in Israel.
Kawhi actually WAS the obvious pick for us in the 2011 Draft based on stats. I remember most of the people on the board I frequented at the time wanted Kawhi. The combination of scoring, rebounding, steals and blocks reminded a lot of us of Marion.
But, yeah, I agree!

suns12345 wrote:bwgood77 wrote:
Is that saying Sabonis is a superior defender? if so, that is surprising.


