ImageImageImage

The 2016 Offseason Thread

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez

RunDogGun
No Sham, More Cam
Posts: 17,891
And1: 5,437
Joined: Jun 27, 2009
Location: Beyond the Sun

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread 

Post#321 » by RunDogGun » Thu Jul 14, 2016 7:24 pm

NTB wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/AlexKennedyNBA/status/753607000693600256[/tweet]

So Phila moved up with Simmons but we're still last.

Man I love years when the odds do this stuff. Our guys always step up. It actually makes me more excited to watch games. Time to put some money down. What are the odds for us to make the playoffs?
User avatar
King4Day
RealGM
Posts: 13,616
And1: 9,823
Joined: Dec 11, 2010
Location: Pandora
         

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread 

Post#322 » by King4Day » Thu Jul 14, 2016 7:32 pm

RunDogGun wrote:Man I love years when the odds do this stuff. Our guys always step up. It actually makes me more excited to watch games. Time to put some money down. What are the odds for us to make the playoffs?


I was thinking this too. Might have a good shot to make some money this year. I'd throw a little down.
"Sometimes, the dragon wins" #RallyTheValley
User avatar
King4Day
RealGM
Posts: 13,616
And1: 9,823
Joined: Dec 11, 2010
Location: Pandora
         

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread 

Post#323 » by King4Day » Thu Jul 14, 2016 7:34 pm

dbrandon wrote:RE: Westbrook, based on what Smitty's said and what I've heard both on and off the record from Royce, he's committed to playing out this season with the team. Nesgoda runs SonicsRising...he's literally the last person I'd count on for any news related to the Thunder.

What I've heard leads me to believe he's going to be here for at least this year. Whether he's here next year I don't know if anyone knows. It's not 100%, but Russ is far more up-front with his opinions than KD, and his circle of influence is much smaller. He talks to his wife and his parents. Maybe Ray.

I was hoping we might be able to offer enough value for TJ (I love him—he was one of my under-the-radar fantasy guys last year along with Hood), but doubt we can. If Tucker's available as a stopgap we could do a lot worse. What would it take?


Are you asking what it would take to get Tucker?
If so, I think the most we could get is a 2nd rounder at this stage. I'm not certain we can get a late first rounder from a contender but if we hold off, maybe we could.
"Sometimes, the dragon wins" #RallyTheValley
letsgosuns
Veteran
Posts: 2,885
And1: 2,167
Joined: Jan 28, 2014

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread 

Post#324 » by letsgosuns » Thu Jul 14, 2016 7:48 pm

dbrandon wrote:RE: Westbrook, based on what Smitty's said and what I've heard both on and off the record from Royce, he's committed to playing out this season with the team. Nesgoda runs SonicsRising...he's literally the last person I'd count on for any news related to the Thunder.

What I've heard leads me to believe he's going to be here for at least this year. Whether he's here next year I don't know if anyone knows. It's not 100%, but Russ is far more up-front with his opinions than KD, and his circle of influence is much smaller. He talks to his wife and his parents. Maybe Ray.

I was hoping we might be able to offer enough value for TJ (I love him—he was one of my under-the-radar fantasy guys last year along with Hood), but doubt we can. If Tucker's available as a stopgap we could do a lot worse. What would it take?


The Thunder's situation reminds me a little bit of the 2010 offseason for the Suns. Different circumstances but the overall bottom line is similar. Going from a title contender to a team just fighting for a playoff spot because one of your superstars leaves.

The Thunder have to look at it realistically and say can we put players around Westbrook through trade or free agency that brings us back into title contention. If the answer is yes, then it is worth holding onto him and hoping to get those players. However, if the answer is we are not sure we can get another top ten player, then you have to think about trading him. Since Westbrook will be an unrestricted free agent, you do not want to lose him for nothing like Durant. If you can get a monster package for him, something like one of those Nets picks that Boston owns, you have to consider it. This upcoming draft is supposed to be awesome and people are predicting the Nets might be the worst team in basketball, so that pick could be top-5.

Btw, I would trade Tucker for any kind of pick in the first round whether it is protected or not protected. I doubt the Suns organization would though. They love Tucker.
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,527
And1: 6,865
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread 

Post#325 » by Andre Roberstan » Thu Jul 14, 2016 7:52 pm

letsgosuns wrote:
dbrandon wrote:RE: Westbrook, based on what Smitty's said and what I've heard both on and off the record from Royce, he's committed to playing out this season with the team. Nesgoda runs SonicsRising...he's literally the last person I'd count on for any news related to the Thunder.

What I've heard leads me to believe he's going to be here for at least this year. Whether he's here next year I don't know if anyone knows. It's not 100%, but Russ is far more up-front with his opinions than KD, and his circle of influence is much smaller. He talks to his wife and his parents. Maybe Ray.

I was hoping we might be able to offer enough value for TJ (I love him—he was one of my under-the-radar fantasy guys last year along with Hood), but doubt we can. If Tucker's available as a stopgap we could do a lot worse. What would it take?


The Thunder's situation reminds me a little bit of the 2010 offseason for the Suns. Different circumstances but the overall bottom line is similar. Going from a title contender to a team just fighting for a playoff spot because one of your superstars leaves.

The Thunder have to look at it realistically and say can we put players around Westbrook through trade or free agency that brings us back into title contention. If the answer is yes, then it is worth holding onto him and hoping to get those players. However, if the answer is we are not sure we can get another top ten player, then you have to think about trading him. Since Westbrook will be an unrestricted free agent, you do not want to lose him for nothing like Durant. If you can get a monster package for him, something like one of those Nets picks that Boston owns, you have to consider it. This upcoming draft is supposed to be awesome and people are predicting the Nets might be the worst team in basketball, so that pick could be top-5.

Btw, I would trade Tucker for any kind of pick in the first round whether it is protected or not protected. I doubt the Suns organization would though. They love Tucker.


They're taking calls, but from what I've heard it would take a pretty significant overpay.

They think Dipo is a 20ppg guy this year. Whether that's true or not IDK. If he is, he and Adams are a pretty good tandem to put next to Russ—with more usage Adams is going to open some eyes.

To the point of the thread, I don't think the Suns would give up what it would take to get Russ, and I don't think the Thunder would take it.
Image
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Re: Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread 

Post#326 » by WeekapaugGroove » Thu Jul 14, 2016 7:54 pm

saintEscaton wrote:
Saberestar wrote:
Qwigglez wrote:^I seriously thought Book was photoshopped until I read what Wade wrote bout Book being his favorite rook around the league. I know several peeps here aren't trying to think too highly of Booker just yet, but it's hard not to think he'll be a star soon when we got future HOF'ers and all-stars taking notice of him.

Yeah, I think he is gonna be AT LEAST an All Star in this league. He has all the tools to be a 20p, 5a, 5r SG and he is gonna be an average defender because he takes pride defensively and he is really smart.

Brandon Roy/Manu Ginobili type of player in his prime.



I see more Allan Houston/Michael Redd with a lead guard mentality. Saying Booker’s floor is an All-Star is going too far IMO, only KAT deserves that projection. Ginobli was basically a gritter more team oriented two-way version of OKC Harden, arguably the most technically gifted passing 2 guard ever. his court vision was Magic/Bird level he could routinely nutmeg defenders, pull out the shammgo/fakeouts and basically pioneeered eurostep. Roy was looking like the second coming o Hardaway, shame areer wasn't ended prematurely and was held back playing in the slowest paced offense, he was a borderline superstar in 2008-2009 we didn't even get to witness his prime. I don't really see the stylistic similarities either, of course Booker can still diversify his game but Roy was different not really a pure shooter like Booker and a 4 year college player so he was more seasoned entering the league. Whereas Booker is an average athlete at Best, Roy was underrated he had hops and could posterize when he wanted to. He was a midrange maestro with his arsenal of fadeaway/pullups/stepbacks could break down his man with heky jerky stop no go deception, a more acrobatic finisher who could switch hands mid air

Its interesting you bring up redd as a comp. I grew up in wisco so watched a lot of redd ands its a good comparison. Bookers probably a little better ball handler though. People forget redd was a hell of a player pre knee injury.
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
User avatar
GetYourPHX
Pro Prospect
Posts: 872
And1: 789
Joined: Feb 10, 2012
 

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread 

Post#327 » by GetYourPHX » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:09 pm

letsgosuns wrote:Btw, I would trade Tucker for any kind of pick in the first round whether it is protected or not protected. I doubt the Suns organization would though. They love Tucker.


The Suns organization loves PJ Tucker because he comes to work. Every team needs guys like him. He's only missed 8 games during his Suns career. That's absolutely amazing.

I know I'm still one of the only members of the PJ Tucker fan club, but there's just no way it's a good idea to trade that guy.
User avatar
saintEscaton
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,996
And1: 2,865
Joined: Jan 31, 2015
Location: The Sonoran
         

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread 

Post#328 » by saintEscaton » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:12 pm

GetYourPHX wrote:
letsgosuns wrote:Btw, I would trade Tucker for any kind of pick in the first round whether it is protected or not protected. I doubt the Suns organization would though. They love Tucker.


The Suns organization loves PJ Tucker because he comes to work. Every team needs guys like him. He's only missed 8 games during his Suns career. That's absolutely amazing.

I know I'm still one of the only members of the PJ Tucker fan club, but there's just no way it's a good idea to trade that guy.


I would do it for Huestis, we could use his disruptive length and shot blocking abilities at the wing
Jonestown Suicide Squad

[. Sign the Petition To Force Sarver Into Selling Our Team

https://www.change.org/p/robert-sarver-sell-the-phoenix-suns-basketball-team-2

Image
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Re: Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread 

Post#329 » by WeekapaugGroove » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:31 pm

saintEscaton wrote:
GetYourPHX wrote:
letsgosuns wrote:Btw, I would trade Tucker for any kind of pick in the first round whether it is protected or not protected. I doubt the Suns organization would though. They love Tucker.


The Suns organization loves PJ Tucker because he comes to work. Every team needs guys like him. He's only missed 8 games during his Suns career. That's absolutely amazing.

I know I'm still one of the only members of the PJ Tucker fan club, but there's just no way it's a good idea to trade that guy.


I would do it for Huestis, we could use his disruptive length and shot blocking abilities at the wing

Yeah id be down with that deal. And it makes sense for okc if they keep russ and try to win this year.
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
User avatar
saintEscaton
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,996
And1: 2,865
Joined: Jan 31, 2015
Location: The Sonoran
         

Re: Re: Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread 

Post#330 » by saintEscaton » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:43 pm

WeekapaugGroove wrote:
saintEscaton wrote:
Saberestar wrote:Yeah, I think he is gonna be AT LEAST an All Star in this league. He has all the tools to be a 20p, 5a, 5r SG and he is gonna be an average defender because he takes pride defensively and he is really smart.

Brandon Roy/Manu Ginobili type of player in his prime.



I see more Allan Houston/Michael Redd with a lead guard mentality. Saying Booker’s floor is an All-Star is going too far IMO, only KAT deserves that projection. Ginobli was basically a gritter more team oriented two-way version of OKC Harden, arguably the most technically gifted passing 2 guard ever. his court vision was Magic/Bird level he could routinely nutmeg defenders, pull out the shammgo/fakeouts and basically pioneeered eurostep. Roy was looking like the second coming o Hardaway, shame areer wasn't ended prematurely and was held back playing in the slowest paced offense, he was a borderline superstar in 2008-2009 we didn't even get to witness his prime. I don't really see the stylistic similarities either, of course Booker can still diversify his game but Roy was different not really a pure shooter like Booker and a 4 year college player so he was more seasoned entering the league. Whereas Booker is an average athlete at Best, Roy was underrated he had hops and could posterize when he wanted to. He was a midrange maestro with his arsenal of fadeaway/pullups/stepbacks could break down his man with heky jerky stop no go deception, a more acrobatic finisher who could switch hands mid air

Its interesting you bring up redd as a comp. I grew up in wisco so watched a lot of redd ands its a good comparison. Bookers probably a little better ball handler though. People forget redd was a hell of a player pre knee injury.

Yeah Booker also seems to have better BBIQ and is less one-dimensional. Redd had a unique behind the ears slingshot release but questionable shot selection, he was pretty dynamic in isolation would often settle for off blaance bank shots like Kobe cauz he could . Houston was limited as a driver but kept Ds honest with his triple threat/jabsteps, Booker seems more capable off the bounce
Jonestown Suicide Squad

[. Sign the Petition To Force Sarver Into Selling Our Team

https://www.change.org/p/robert-sarver-sell-the-phoenix-suns-basketball-team-2

Image
JMac1
Suns Forum Training Specialist
Posts: 10,032
And1: 4,004
Joined: May 23, 2009

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread 

Post#331 » by JMac1 » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:51 pm

dbrandon wrote:
letsgosuns wrote:
dbrandon wrote:RE: Westbrook, based on what Smitty's said and what I've heard both on and off the record from Royce, he's committed to playing out this season with the team. Nesgoda runs SonicsRising...he's literally the last person I'd count on for any news related to the Thunder.

What I've heard leads me to believe he's going to be here for at least this year. Whether he's here next year I don't know if anyone knows. It's not 100%, but Russ is far more up-front with his opinions than KD, and his circle of influence is much smaller. He talks to his wife and his parents. Maybe Ray.

I was hoping we might be able to offer enough value for TJ (I love him—he was one of my under-the-radar fantasy guys last year along with Hood), but doubt we can. If Tucker's available as a stopgap we could do a lot worse. What would it take?


The Thunder's situation reminds me a little bit of the 2010 offseason for the Suns. Different circumstances but the overall bottom line is similar. Going from a title contender to a team just fighting for a playoff spot because one of your superstars leaves.

The Thunder have to look at it realistically and say can we put players around Westbrook through trade or free agency that brings us back into title contention. If the answer is yes, then it is worth holding onto him and hoping to get those players. However, if the answer is we are not sure we can get another top ten player, then you have to think about trading him. Since Westbrook will be an unrestricted free agent, you do not want to lose him for nothing like Durant. If you can get a monster package for him, something like one of those Nets picks that Boston owns, you have to consider it. This upcoming draft is supposed to be awesome and people are predicting the Nets might be the worst team in basketball, so that pick could be top-5.

Btw, I would trade Tucker for any kind of pick in the first round whether it is protected or not protected. I doubt the Suns organization would though. They love Tucker.


They're taking calls, but from what I've heard it would take a pretty significant overpay.

They think Dipo is a 20ppg guy this year. Whether that's true or not IDK. If he is, he and Adams are a pretty good tandem to put next to Russ—with more usage Adams is going to open some eyes.

To the point of the thread, I don't think the Suns would give up what it would take to get Russ, and I don't think the Thunder would take it.


Thunder should take what they can get, you'd think they'd have learned already. I guess they want to go four for four. Harden, Jackson, KD and now Westbrook. Sometimes it is better to sell your stock before it has zero value.

You guys are in trouble. Nobody not named the Lakers are trading for him and the Lakers won't because he is a FA next year.
Saberestar
RealGM
Posts: 22,370
And1: 17,004
Joined: May 21, 2010

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread 

Post#332 » by Saberestar » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:53 pm

saintEscaton wrote:
Saberestar wrote:
Qwigglez wrote:^I seriously thought Book was photoshopped until I read what Wade wrote bout Book being his favorite rook around the league. I know several peeps here aren't trying to think too highly of Booker just yet, but it's hard not to think he'll be a star soon when we got future HOF'ers and all-stars taking notice of him.

Yeah, I think he is gonna be AT LEAST an All Star in this league. He has all the tools to be a 20p, 5a, 5r SG and he is gonna be an average defender because he takes pride defensively and he is really smart.

Brandon Roy/Manu Ginobili type of player in his prime.



I see more Allan Houston/Michael Redd with a lead guard mentality. Saying Booker’s floor is an All-Star is going too far IMO, only KAT deserves that projection. Ginobli was basically a gritter more team oriented two-way version of OKC Harden, arguably the most technically gifted passing 2 guard ever. his court vision was Magic/Bird level he could routinely nutmeg defenders, pull out the shammgo/fakeouts and basically pioneeered eurostep. Roy was looking like the second coming o Hardaway, shame areer wasn't ended prematurely and was held back playing in the slowest paced offense, he was a borderline superstar in 2008-2009 we didn't even get to witness his prime. I don't really see the stylistic similarities either, of course Booker can still diversify his game but Roy was different not really a pure shooter like Booker and a 4 year college player so he was more seasoned entering the league. Whereas Booker is an average athlete at Best, Roy was underrated he had hops and could posterize when he wanted to. He was a midrange maestro with his arsenal of fadeaway/pullups/stepbacks could break down his man with heky jerky stop no go deception, a more acrobatic finisher who could switch hands mid air

Those are great comp too, I loved Houston's game and Redd was really fun to watch. Great in isolations in the high post, Booker can be like him in that area.

When I said that Booker is gonna be at least an All Star I was referring to an occasional All Star like Korver or Deng has been. It would be very difficult to believe that he is not gonna be an All Star some season in the next 10-12 years because he is so advanced at his age and his demeanour is amazing. That is his floor IMO.
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,527
And1: 6,865
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread 

Post#333 » by Andre Roberstan » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:12 pm

JMac1 wrote:
dbrandon wrote:
letsgosuns wrote:
The Thunder's situation reminds me a little bit of the 2010 offseason for the Suns. Different circumstances but the overall bottom line is similar. Going from a title contender to a team just fighting for a playoff spot because one of your superstars leaves.

The Thunder have to look at it realistically and say can we put players around Westbrook through trade or free agency that brings us back into title contention. If the answer is yes, then it is worth holding onto him and hoping to get those players. However, if the answer is we are not sure we can get another top ten player, then you have to think about trading him. Since Westbrook will be an unrestricted free agent, you do not want to lose him for nothing like Durant. If you can get a monster package for him, something like one of those Nets picks that Boston owns, you have to consider it. This upcoming draft is supposed to be awesome and people are predicting the Nets might be the worst team in basketball, so that pick could be top-5.

Btw, I would trade Tucker for any kind of pick in the first round whether it is protected or not protected. I doubt the Suns organization would though. They love Tucker.


They're taking calls, but from what I've heard it would take a pretty significant overpay.

They think Dipo is a 20ppg guy this year. Whether that's true or not IDK. If he is, he and Adams are a pretty good tandem to put next to Russ—with more usage Adams is going to open some eyes.

To the point of the thread, I don't think the Suns would give up what it would take to get Russ, and I don't think the Thunder would take it.


Thunder should take what they can get, you'd think they'd have learned already. I guess they want to go four for four. Harden, Jackson, KD and now Westbrook. Sometimes it is better to sell your stock before it has zero value.

You guys are in trouble. Nobody not named the Lakers are trading for him and the Lakers won't because he is a FA next year.


We just lost a top-3 player in the NBA and we're replacing him with Andre Roberson. Anyone who thinks we're not in some level of trouble needs to have their head examined.

But the fact that you lumped a guy traded well before his RFA, a guy traded in the middle of his RFA season, and a guy who walked in free agency together in "selling your stock before it has zero value" doesn't give me a ton of confidence in that opinion.

There are offers on the table for him, whether you think "nobody not named the Lakers are trading for him" or not. But they'll only trade him if he says he's gone. He's not exactly one to hide his feelings. They'll know if he's seriously considering other teams in FA.
Image
User avatar
saintEscaton
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,996
And1: 2,865
Joined: Jan 31, 2015
Location: The Sonoran
         

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread 

Post#334 » by saintEscaton » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:16 pm

Saberestar wrote:
saintEscaton wrote:
Saberestar wrote:Yeah, I think he is gonna be AT LEAST an All Star in this league. He has all the tools to be a 20p, 5a, 5r SG and he is gonna be an average defender because he takes pride defensively and he is really smart.

Brandon Roy/Manu Ginobili type of player in his prime.



I see more Allan Houston/Michael Redd with a lead guard mentality. Saying Booker’s floor is an All-Star is going too far IMO, only KAT deserves that projection. Ginobli was basically a gritter more team oriented two-way version of OKC Harden, arguably the most technically gifted passing 2 guard ever. his court vision was Magic/Bird level he could routinely nutmeg defenders, pull out the shammgo/fakeouts and basically pioneeered eurostep. Roy was looking like the second coming o Hardaway, shame areer wasn't ended prematurely and was held back playing in the slowest paced offense, he was a borderline superstar in 2008-2009 we didn't even get to witness his prime. I don't really see the stylistic similarities either, of course Booker can still diversify his game but Roy was different not really a pure shooter like Booker and a 4 year college player so he was more seasoned entering the league. Whereas Booker is an average athlete at Best, Roy was underrated he had hops and could posterize when he wanted to. He was a midrange maestro with his arsenal of fadeaway/pullups/stepbacks could break down his man with heky jerky stop no go deception, a more acrobatic finisher who could switch hands mid air

Those are great comp too, I loved Houston's game and Redd was really fun to watch. Great in isolations in the high post, Booker can be like him in that area.

When I said that Booker is gonna be at least an All Star I was referring to an occasional All Star like Korver or Deng has been. It would be very difficult to believe that he is not gonna be an All Star some season in the next 10-12 years because he is so advanced at his age and his demeanour is amazing. That is his floor IMO.



Yeah he may not be a perennial shooin, but he will definitely get some selections due to the dearth at the position in the West besides Klay., there is more depth out East but no one is dethroning Harden any time . McCollum will be Book's main challenger
Jonestown Suicide Squad

[. Sign the Petition To Force Sarver Into Selling Our Team

https://www.change.org/p/robert-sarver-sell-the-phoenix-suns-basketball-team-2

Image
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,168
And1: 61,013
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread 

Post#335 » by bwgood77 » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:33 pm

NTB wrote:I think Brandon Roy / Manu Ginobili thing was spot on. Booker has a really good court vision and playmaking ability. He can play pick and roll really well and I saw Booker throwing pocket passes like Steve Nash a lot. Also Booker is not just a "shooter" we know that. I think we will have our next star in Booker after Amar'e.


I don't think they are very good comps, and they are both great players at what they do, and I think Booker can be just as or more valuable, but I think he's a different kind of player. Not sure who is best comp is or that we particularly need one. He's definitely closer to those guys than Harden is to Magic or Bird as someone a couple of posts above you suggested though.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,168
And1: 61,013
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread 

Post#336 » by bwgood77 » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:34 pm

RunDogGun wrote:Man I love years when the odds do this stuff. Our guys always step up. It actually makes me more excited to watch games. Time to put some money down. What are the odds for us to make the playoffs?


There are probably not odds on that yet or I don't even know if they have those, but the best bet if you expect a good season is to bet on the over in projected wins. That probably hasn't been released yet, but I imagine it will be somewhere in the 20s.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,168
And1: 61,013
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread 

Post#337 » by bwgood77 » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:36 pm

dbrandon wrote:
letsgosuns wrote:
dbrandon wrote:RE: Westbrook, based on what Smitty's said and what I've heard both on and off the record from Royce, he's committed to playing out this season with the team. Nesgoda runs SonicsRising...he's literally the last person I'd count on for any news related to the Thunder.

What I've heard leads me to believe he's going to be here for at least this year. Whether he's here next year I don't know if anyone knows. It's not 100%, but Russ is far more up-front with his opinions than KD, and his circle of influence is much smaller. He talks to his wife and his parents. Maybe Ray.

I was hoping we might be able to offer enough value for TJ (I love him—he was one of my under-the-radar fantasy guys last year along with Hood), but doubt we can. If Tucker's available as a stopgap we could do a lot worse. What would it take?


The Thunder's situation reminds me a little bit of the 2010 offseason for the Suns. Different circumstances but the overall bottom line is similar. Going from a title contender to a team just fighting for a playoff spot because one of your superstars leaves.

The Thunder have to look at it realistically and say can we put players around Westbrook through trade or free agency that brings us back into title contention. If the answer is yes, then it is worth holding onto him and hoping to get those players. However, if the answer is we are not sure we can get another top ten player, then you have to think about trading him. Since Westbrook will be an unrestricted free agent, you do not want to lose him for nothing like Durant. If you can get a monster package for him, something like one of those Nets picks that Boston owns, you have to consider it. This upcoming draft is supposed to be awesome and people are predicting the Nets might be the worst team in basketball, so that pick could be top-5.

Btw, I would trade Tucker for any kind of pick in the first round whether it is protected or not protected. I doubt the Suns organization would though. They love Tucker.


They're taking calls, but from what I've heard it would take a pretty significant overpay.

They think Dipo is a 20ppg guy this year. Whether that's true or not IDK. If he is, he and Adams are a pretty good tandem to put next to Russ—with more usage Adams is going to open some eyes.

To the point of the thread, I don't think the Suns would give up what it would take to get Russ, and I don't think the Thunder would take it.


I don't know if they want to trade Tucker and I don't know a lot about McGary, but maybe a guy like that and a 2nd as long as you guys had a good season and it was a high second. :D
User avatar
thamadkant
Suns Forum Picker of Cherries
Posts: 16,916
And1: 8,599
Joined: Jan 06, 2007
 

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread 

Post#338 » by thamadkant » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:37 pm

With Bledsoe, Knight...you'd think suns would be higher in the odds for a ring than Nets or 76ers.

But I think this is a reflection on the FO and coaching.
Suns FO seems to contradict each other in direction. Coach has no on court merit. Direction and identity is fluid.... Which is terrible for a team with veterans on it.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,168
And1: 61,013
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread 

Post#339 » by bwgood77 » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:44 pm

dbrandon wrote:
JMac1 wrote:
dbrandon wrote:
They're taking calls, but from what I've heard it would take a pretty significant overpay.

They think Dipo is a 20ppg guy this year. Whether that's true or not IDK. If he is, he and Adams are a pretty good tandem to put next to Russ—with more usage Adams is going to open some eyes.

To the point of the thread, I don't think the Suns would give up what it would take to get Russ, and I don't think the Thunder would take it.


Thunder should take what they can get, you'd think they'd have learned already. I guess they want to go four for four. Harden, Jackson, KD and now Westbrook. Sometimes it is better to sell your stock before it has zero value.

You guys are in trouble. Nobody not named the Lakers are trading for him and the Lakers won't because he is a FA next year.


We just lost a top-3 player in the NBA and we're replacing him with Andre Roberson. Anyone who thinks we're not in some level of trouble needs to have their head examined.

But the fact that you lumped a guy traded well before his RFA, a guy traded in the middle of his RFA season, and a guy who walked in free agency together in "selling your stock before it has zero value" doesn't give me a ton of confidence in that opinion.

There are offers on the table for him, whether you think "nobody not named the Lakers are trading for him" or not. But they'll only trade him if he says he's gone. He's not exactly one to hide his feelings. They'll know if he's seriously considering other teams in FA.


Yeah, I wouldn't listen to that. I think there is a pretty good chance Russ stays.
User avatar
saintEscaton
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,996
And1: 2,865
Joined: Jan 31, 2015
Location: The Sonoran
         

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread 

Post#340 » by saintEscaton » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:44 pm

bwgood77 wrote:
NTB wrote:I think Brandon Roy / Manu Ginobili thing was spot on. Booker has a really good court vision and playmaking ability. He can play pick and roll really well and I saw Booker throwing pocket passes like Steve Nash a lot. Also Booker is not just a "shooter" we know that. I think we will have our next star in Booker after Amar'e.


I don't think they are very good comps, and they are both great players at what they do, and I think Booker can be just as or more valuable, but I think he's a different kind of player. Not sure who is best comp is or that we particularly need one. He's definitely closer to those guys than Harden is to Magic or Bird as someone a couple of posts above you suggested though.


Might wanna reread my post, was referring to Ginobili’s otherworldly playmaking, but you are a closet OKC fan who thinks Harden is cancer incarnate and that Westbrook is twice the player AI ever was. All these comps are based off of the subjective eye test right now, so lets let Booker be Booker for now
Jonestown Suicide Squad

[. Sign the Petition To Force Sarver Into Selling Our Team

https://www.change.org/p/robert-sarver-sell-the-phoenix-suns-basketball-team-2

Image

Return to Phoenix Suns