Cutter wrote:bondom34 wrote:Cutter wrote:Yeah, Westbrook taking 25-35-40 shots attempts per game is not ball hog territory.

Ah,made up stats are the best. He averages about 17, and is a better playmaker than anyone on the team. Yeah, I'll take the guy who's the second best scoring option on the team taking the second most shots on the team. Seems a sensible idea. Unless of course he should have been passing it to Perkins all these years.
The leading cause of blindness on this site is homerism. Don't intentionally be blind!

Westbrook had multiple games last season where he shot 25-30 and even had a 40 fga game. Hence the ball hog label. Don't get me started on his stats as an inefficient chucker of the ball. Westbrook is holding OKC back from getting a championship.

Last year when there were no other scoring options? And blind homerism from you, ah the irony! He's averaged 17 per game for his career, so half what you said. He was 3 games from a title, and oh the stats which I posted have shown plenty. As well, prior to this season (when he had Durant for about 28 games, Ibaka missed over a month, he had Perk at C for most of the year, and no other scoring options than Morrow), he shot 30 times in a game.......twice. To put that in perspective he had a greater number of games with 13 rebounds, or 15 assists (not counting this season). To second that, in 2006 your own Steve Nash had 4 games with 25 shots per game and a better supporting cast, PHX went 1-3. So yes, outliers happen. No, that doesn't mean I can say with any honesty that he shot that much every game. Its flat dishonest.
I'll keep the chucker, you keep your ideals, I wouldn't want you to actually look at numbers and think of his impact, may hurt your bias.
So the sad attempt at labeling him a ball hog is both:
1. False
2. Poorly thought out
And "inefficient" is also wrong, considering he's at league average efficiency. So, well, you're wrong. But please keep the cute emoticons coming, you only look more and more foolish.