WeekapaugGroove wrote:bwgood77 wrote:WeekapaugGroove wrote:Outside of Curry they just aren't that good, especially their bench which is going to get proper **** most nights in the brutal ass west.
I was lower on this team even with Klay. Without him I legit think they could finish last in the West.
Edit: 14th actually, OKC is tanking from day 1 so probably hard to get under them.
Sent from my SM-G986U using
RealGM mobile app
I will be surprised if they are THAT bad. I mean a lot of people liked Oubre a lot and he does have some skills, though if he moved the ball better and shot a little better from 3 that would help their offense. Though he did shoot over 35% last year which isn't that bad.
I am not sure who their other best 3 pt shooter is..looks like they all shot 33-36% last year, but whoever shoots best now, unless they are a scrub, I'd probably start and maybe bring Wiggins off the bench.
But either way, I probably would not start Draymond and Wiseman together and would bring Wiseman off the bench
Draymond should help with his defense and playmaking, as long as they don't play him with Wiseman, unless one of them has a legit 3. Draymond hasn't shot well from 3 since 15-16 though.
I think Klay would help a ton though..as he would HAVE to be guarded and with him and Curry so good at shooting the 3, even off the dribble, it would make them significantly tougher and they'd have a pretty legit lineup with them two, Draymond, Wiggins and Oubre.
I like Oubre and think he'll put up career numbers.
It's a bold pick to say they will be that bad but I'm calling my shot. I see lots of problems m They really need another guard who can take some pressure off Curry. Teams are going to key so much on Steph I think it wears him down. Wiggins is inconsistent. I don't think Green is going to age well. Wiseman could be good but rookie bigs typically take a little time. The 3pt shooting is sketchy after Curry. And last but certainly not least is they have to play too many bad players when they go to the bench or have any injuries. Weve seen with the suns in the past when you play bad players even limited minutes it just murders you in the deep west.
Sent from my SM-G986U using
RealGM mobile app
I guess it depends on how we define bad. I do expect without Klay for Memphis and NOP to finish ahead of them. Kings will be close...I might lean Kings, but I think both teams will be good, just not good enough to compete very well for the 8th spot. I do think all 4 of those teams will be in the running for the play in game, and possibly Memphis and NOP for the 8th if Houston trades Harden for more young guys, but also Boogie is playing well and with him, Wall, Wood, Tucker and Gordon they have a pretty solid starting lineup even without Harden.
I expect GS to be better than the TWolves, Thunder and probably the Spurs, but the Spurs do have a few nice vets with LMA, DD and DW. It may depend on how well Murray, Vassell, Walker and Poetl do.
Then for GS it will depend on Wiseman and if Green comes back to his previous play which I think he will. A lot lies on Wiggins and Oubre fitting more into their system and having decent D though.
I think the TWolves would be FAR better with Rubio starting...like his impact would be similar to how it was for the Suns..otherwise that starting lineup is just not good defensively and too many guys only trying to score.
I'd let Beasley come off the bench with Edwards and their backup PG.