SSOL wrote:sunsbum wrote:cool post, obviously this was in reference before any news broke about a suspension or a fine. Y’all have been slandering his name for the last year with no proof of anything but hearsay from ex/disgruntled employees. I’m sure there are just as many people willing to go on record saying he’s a peach. If they found things that he said were unacceptable at the work place then im glad he’s getting reprimanded and held accountable for it. Personally it looks to me like they didn’t find much and this is just a “see we did something” moment for the NBA.SSOL wrote:
No one is responsible for dragging his name through the mud except for Sarver himself. He made a decision as to how he wanted to conduct himself in a professional environment and a comprehensive investigation has proven that conduct to be reprehensible. To say or claim otherwise is to say that a lengthy and independent investigation by one of the absolute top law firms in the country is faulty and/or flawed and I would find it hard to believe that you have facts to support such a claim. Props to the people that came forward and I hope they can find some solace with the result. That $10M will hit him in ways it wouldn't usually in the case of many other Governors.
Fundamentally flawed argument and reasoning but again…I expect nothing less, or I guess more (?) from you.
Just because you allege that some people would go on record saying he is, as you say, “a peach,” does not discount the horrendous things he said and did to others.
Slandering his name? I don’t recall making any type of false statement in regards to Sarver.
Didn’t find much? See the previous post or…read the statement. They found plenty and that is why they issued the stiffest financial penalty possible. The only thing the league could have done that would have resulted in a harsher penalty is a forced sale and that is not on the table.
Why would you expect anything from me, I bring my own opinion and I don’t owe you or anyone an apology for it. You can attack me all you want, I’m comfortable not acting like I walk this world free of sin unlike a lot of people on this subject. Again, the scale seems a bit off for what sarver did and what his disciplinary action was as opposed to sterling. Why would a forced sale be off the table?
You can play the I told you so card now after the league has handed down their fine, but you (and when I say you I mean people on this board) really had no idea what was going on outside of hearsay and stuff being filtered through the media.