Say hello to the newest sun: Stephen Curry

ihateginobili · Post #461 » by **ihateginobili** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:59 am

Nelly just hit me up on my cell and told me to not believe the things he has said about Curry.

enigmatics · Post #462 » by **enigmatics** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:00 am

thamadkant wrote:Keeping Stoudemire is not option 1 though.

(1) He will walk out since Suns brass "hurt" his feelings, and if he does stay he will not take any form of home town discount, he'd demand a 3 year 75 Million extension...

(2) Sure, get Chandler here for Wallace's contract, and just develop Clark. But if you can fleece Warriors and get Randolph + Beidrins + 2010 First pick + Bellinili for Stoudemire.... I think thats an okay deal.

Who cares? Let him walk. What's worse here: We get some scrubs or we get salary cap relief for next summer with all those FA's? Be reasonable. Why would we want some scrubs with remaining years on their deals just to have them?

frsh90 · Post #463 » by **frsh90** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:00 am

enigmatics wrote:Guys .............are trades only allowed to happen in the span of 48 hours? C'mon.

LOL @ any GW fan who thinks they're going to be allowed to keep every single cornerstone player they have and just drafted AND get Amare.

They've got a talent pool of Ellis, Biedrins, Randolph, Jackson, and Curry. They're not just going to have Amare delivered to them knowing that. It takes a bit of quality to get a player of Amare's caliber. Put down the NBA Live every once and a while and come on back to reality.

We don't keep every cornerstone playing if we trade for Amare.. you guys are getting Biedrins

Coxy · Post #464 » by **Coxy** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:01 am

thamadkant wrote:Many variables and factors at the moment.... not to mention Warriors seems to be going back on their word, it seems GM and coach are having difference of opinion and there is a heated debate...

simple... if Curry doesnt come with the deal.

Suns then demand Randolph and 2010 first pick.

They want Curry and Stoudemire core, then you gonna have to give something up for (1) Going back on your words (2) Having a finisher and scorer big man in Stoudemire and a future star in Curry at the one.

I'd be "okay" with Randolph.... and 2010 pick.

F^%K this untouchable crap, because you cant have your cake and eat it too.

Wow. This post is all over the place.

Of course Im not in the Warrior FO, but I'm pretty sure we hang up the phone when Anthony Randolph's name comes into the discussion. I'm sure Kerr has probably already asked about Randolph's availablity, and that would have been promptly shot down. No way the Warriors give up Randolph for Stoudemire. No way.

This deal will happen with Curry, Biedrins, Wright and XXXXXXX involved. I think Nellies just trying to pry a little extra something out of Kerr for it, like a future pick or another player (Clarke maybe).

Who knows what it'll be, but in a poker game between Nellie and Kerr, my money goes on Nellie for sure. He loves mind games, and could make most grown men fold even if he was betting with a pair of 2's.

Mr. Sun · Post #465 » by **Mr. Sun** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:01 am

ihateginobili wrote:Nelly just hit me up on my cell and told me to not believe the things he has said about Curry.

Dang, is he drunk or something?

Scott T · Post #466 » by **Scott T** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:01 am

Kerrsed wrote:Amare/Tucker for Beans/Bukie/Morrow/Randolph/2010 1st round (top 3 protected).

And you guys are criticizing Warrior fans?

collidingNeurons · Post #467 » by **collidingNeurons** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:01 am

lilfishi22 wrote:
rsavaj wrote:can we please just get chandler and move on now?

kerr got played big time.

Kerr can still redeem himself if he keeps this team as is and brings in Chandler for the fabled AMARE/CHANDLER front court.

I hope this deal breaks down. If Kerr budges and accepts this deal without Curry coming, I'm done with the Suns until we get a new ownership and FO.

Me too, i am one bad deal away from taking the Suns off my "i give a damn" list

enigmatics · Post #468 » by **enigmatics** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:01 am

frsh90 wrote:
We don't keep every cornerstone playing if we trade for Amare.. you guys are getting Biedrins

Biedrins is not a good enough swap! Not even close. And none of the fillers make up for that either.

Post #469 » by **lilfishi22** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:02 am

I'm not even that overly excited about this Curry kid. All I see in him is a slightly smaller version of Ellis with somewhat better court vision and passing.

Randolph is a different story. If it is true that he's put on something lik 20lbs, he could possibly be Stoudemire with more range and defense.

frsh90 · Post #470 » by **frsh90** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:02 am

thamadkant wrote:Many variables and factors at the moment.... not to mention Warriors seems to be going back on their word, it seems GM and coach are having difference of opinion and there is a heated debate...

simple... if Curry doesnt come with the deal.

Suns then demand Randolph and 2010 first pick.

They want Curry and Stoudemire core, then you gonna have to give something up for (1) Going back on your words (2) Having a finisher and scorer big man in Stoudemire and a future star in Curry at the one.

I'd be "okay" with Randolph.... and 2010 pick.

F^%K this untouchable crap, because you cant have your cake and eat it too.

As ridiculous and extra homer of me this may sound.. I would not trade Randolph for Amare straight up if I could.

Post #471 » by **TASTIC** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:02 am

IHG can you email me ASAP please

Traxxe · Post #472 » by **Traxxe** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:03 am

Tastic, email sent.

I'll post something more when I hear it but I have a time delay. Last I heard Nelson and GSW is still on board if we insist. Nelson would be open to other ideas beyond giving up Curry but the FO isn't as sold to that idea. But he will bite on what we agreed to if necessary.

YouTube · Post #473 » by **Kerrsed** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:03 am

ihateginobili wrote:Nelly just hit me up on my cell and told me to not believe the things he has said about Curry.

LULZ!!! I love it!

yehyeh82 · Post #474 » by **yehyeh82** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:03 am

Warriors can't trade a 2010 pick....

enigmatics · Post #475 » by **enigmatics** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:03 am

lilfishi22 wrote:I'm not even that overly excited about this Curry kid. All I see in him is a slightly smaller version of Ellis with somewhat better court vision and passing.

Randolph is a different story. If it is true that he's put on something lik 20lbs, he could possibly be Stoudemire with more range and defense.

Gotta disagree on one issue...............Curry's father just posted up in the corner. Stephon has handles, slashes, and shoots. There's a big time difference in their games.

collidingNeurons · Post #476 » by **collidingNeurons** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:03 am

Sick1 wrote:
Kerrsed wrote:Amare/Tucker for Beans/Bukie/Morrow/Randolph/2010 1st round (top 3 protected).

And you guys are criticizing Warrior fans?

Every fan base has their share of people that don't have a real clue.. you just learn not to take the outlandish stuff so seriously

thamadkant · Post #477 » by **thamadkant** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:04 am

enigmatics...

YOU want to have atleast 2-3 "good" young players on the roster to attract a big time FA.... Im talking Wade, James category.

Having, Dragic, Lopez, Dudley, and a 29 year old Richardson as your team mates isnt very promising.. although I really hope Clark pans out to be a decent player.

Having a Curry, Biedrins, a Randolph etc on the roster helps dramatically..

Post #478 » by **TASTIC** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:04 am

bugger curry

I want Randolph

WTFsunsFTW · Post #479 » by **WTFsunsFTW** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:04 am

Text from AZCentral:

If Suns send Stoudemire to Warriors, they won't get Stephen Curry back.

gswhoopsman · Post #480 » by **gswhoopsman** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:04 am

Another possibility is that Nellie is hyping curry so he can "concede" but keep wright, knowing we need SOME depth in the frontcourt.