WeekapaugGroove wrote:Sure but longer the suspension the higher likelihood he actually would sell. What use is having a toy you can't play with?bwgood77 wrote:WeekapaugGroove wrote:He gave him the highest fine but he could he have banned him for longer. Stirling got a lifetime ban.
Now I do agree with the notion he probably didn't have the votes to oust him, owners are very leery to set that presidence.
But I'm not sure he anticipated this much push back from players, media, fans. This is a **** strom that's not going away.
Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
Honestly if it was a 3 year suspension or whatever, I wouldn't be surprised if people were just as upset. I think they basically wanted him to be forced to sell.
I don't think things will be right with this franchise until he sells. If he digs his heels in and comes back next year this franchise is toast. Like royally ****.
Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
Well he's been around a long time and we have just had two of our best seasons ever. This news and his treatment of stuff hung over their head the entire season. Do you think that stuff suddenly impacted them in the Dallas series or something?
I mean, we were royally toast for a decade before the last two years. I think with Jones and Monty players would want to play here....and this stuff always seems to be huge news for a few weeks and then it fades. This keeps popping up again when something happens but then fades again. After the big report on espn with all sorts of quotes, etc, and then a reported investigation all season we had our best regular season ever.
When it comes to free agents, I think for the most part players will go where the money is at unless they are forming some super team. Heck we just had KD say he wanted to come to Phx...we were basically the only team, and this news was already all out there already....and Sarver was still working.
I'd prefer him be gone just because he's a jackass, extremeley inappropriate, an ahole, racist, sexist, misogynistic and I think he's pretty cheap, so I assume anyone would probably be better. And anyone who can buy a team now probably has deeper pockets. If it's minority stake owners taking over they probably don't have real deep pockets but of course I'd prefer to Sarver.