bwgood77 wrote:aIvin adams wrote:NavLDO wrote:
nahh that shouldnt count he was coming to a new team with almost no practice.
incidentally he finally started to look like himself in that first half where he sprained his ankle
I'm not sure how you did it, but you just made it look like I said something that
NavDo said....don't put his words in my mouth!

Or anything else of mine in his mouth either!
And it's Nav
LDO...I'm a limited duty officer in the Navy--I don't "Do" the Navy!
Wow, I really need to clean-up the nasty/gross thoughts in my head!!!! 2

in one post!!
But back to business--I get that if McD started at $14M, they likely would have settled on $15M, but if $14M was McD's number, I think that it gets resolved quicker. It appears that Bledsoe's agent was the major culprit in the length/level of the drama that ensued, but I find it hard to believe that if $14M was McD's number, that he'd let what happened, actually happen. I think he was set on $12-$12.5M, and refused to budge from that early on, but as the deadline approached, I think he and Sarver/Babby caved a bit to make it happen. I honestly think that had our FO offered closer to $14M earlier, and had not given the impression early on that they would budge somewhat, the deal would have been done sooner, and likely close to what was signed. It takes two to tango, of course, because Bledsoe's camp gave the impression that they wouldn't come down from the Max, as well.
aIvin adams wrote:nahh that shouldnt count he was coming to a new team with almost no practice.
incidentally he finally started to look like himself in that first half where he sprained his ankle.
And as far as his play "counting" or not--doesn't matter the circumstances, the team negotiating to sign him is going to bring that up. Fair or not, it can, and will be, 'spun' during the negotiations, just like any injury would, or any other factor that helps to make the case for the team.
I agree with you that it
shouldn't count, but I know if I'm the Suns' FO, I'm bringing that up as "hey, we really like you and want to sign you, but your stats, etc., show you are worth about what [insert name here of PG with similar stats/metrics that got paid whatever contract that player signed in FA this year].
Knight's camp is likely to argue exactly what you are saying, but the FO is going to counter with the above an say it's the most recent stats on the team he's paying for now--how do they know whether it's due to playing in the West as opposed to the East, or whether it's due to a different team/teammates, or other.
So that was my point--not that I actually believe it's reality, or ground truth, just that it's going to be used in negotiations.