Say hello to the newest sun: Stephen Curry

OrangeMan · Post #561 » by **OrangeMan** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:25 am

jdswish24 wrote:well orangemen...his last twitter statement said he was being traded to the lakers... do you really think, there is any way that he is being serious?? please wake up man.. ur acting like the guy who asked if earl clark will be wearing number 9....

Did you even read my post im not the one thinking he was giving us a direct statement im the one saying thats hes probably screwing with us and that his statement could be taken in sooo many different ways. Dude read.

Post #562 » by **lilfishi22** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:25 am

OrangeMan wrote:
All he said was "Breaking news Amar'e to Goldenstate. What do you think?"

That statement can be taken as just teasing us like he already has or asking us what we think of him going there or that im on my way to GS whaddaythink? It could be taken sooo many ways

I think he's fielding some responses to see if he should sign an extension with the W's.

Mr. Sun · Post #563 » by **Mr. Sun** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:25 am

Why the Amare deal is really dead: Amare's agent demanded max money for a 5 year extension. Warriors can't pay it. This is why Nelson is saying Curry isn't going anywhere.

Post #564 » by **FNQ** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:27 am

I dont think the Warriors will have an issue giving him the money... but knowing Rowell, he will look to cover our asses in the process... I'm betting there will be multiple deal escalators and clauses to protect us should Amare's knee or eye get even worse..

azballer53 · Post #565 » by **azballer53** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:27 am

Mr. Sun wrote:Why the Amare deal is really dead: Amare's agent demanded max money for a 5 year extension. Warriors can't pay it. This is why Nelson is saying Curry isn't going anywhere.

to bad he can only sign max for three years which means 2 yrs of what hes at now and 3 years of max

jdswish24 · Post #566 » by **jdswish24** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:28 am

OrangeMan wrote:
jdswish24 wrote:well orangemen...his last twitter statement said he was being traded to the lakers... do you really think, there is any way that he is being serious?? please wake up man.. ur acting like the guy who asked if earl clark will be wearing number 9....

Did you even read my post im not the one thinking he was giving us a direct statement im the one saying thats hes probably screwing with us and that his statement could be taken in sooo many different ways. Dude read.

dude...I give up...I was saying that ur post and comment was pointless...amare has just been messing with everyone all day! and my bad about comparing you to the guy who talked about earl clark..that guy was a moron..he said he saw clark holding an 09 jersey at the press conferance..he so funny! and robin lopez is number 08..haha

thamadkant · Post #567 » by **thamadkant** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:31 am

Just for the warrior fans that deny any Randolph for Stoudemire trades... you guys are dellusional.

Thats why Warriors will stay pat and just be a 41-41 team every season.... and thats on a good season too.

You have Don Nelson who has always craved a big man inside who is power with a jump shot and can run.... thats Stoudemire... all-star, in his prime.
In your team, he is a 15-20 game win difference... because of the way the team is constructed...

Randolph is Odom-part deux... albeit with better shot blocking... he isnt a power player that can ANCHOR Warrior's offensive tactics... He helps Warriors but the impact a Stoudemire can bring especially with Jackson, Ellis, Magette, Morrow, thats shooting and slashing even more so than Suns a couple years back...

Just dont get why these warrior fans over rate Randolph as much... sure Suns fans over rate Stoudemire also... but looking at team needs... Stoudemire would thrive and impact that team more so than what Randolph can and will in the next 3-4 years.

Mr. Sun · Post #568 » by **Mr. Sun** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:31 am

azballer53 wrote:
Mr. Sun wrote:Why the Amare deal is really dead: Amare's agent demanded max money for a 5 year extension. Warriors can't pay it. This is why Nelson is saying Curry isn't going anywhere.

to bad he can only sign max for three years which means 2 yrs of what hes at now and 3 years of max

Well I mean a total of 5 years including the 2 remaining.

azballer53 · Post #569 » by **azballer53** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:33 am

Mr. Sun wrote:
azballer53 wrote:
Mr. Sun wrote:Why the Amare deal is really dead: Amare's agent demanded max money for a 5 year extension. Warriors can't pay it. This is why Nelson is saying Curry isn't going anywhere.

to bad he can only sign max for three years which means 2 yrs of what hes at now and 3 years of max

Well I mean a total of 5 years including the 2 remaining.

alright but they wouldnt be able to pay a little extra for three years to keep a allstar caliber player

delsol650 · Post #570 » by **delsol650** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:47 am

What GSW fans are giving IHG' crap?
I personally don't like the trade but I do appreciate IGH' for putting info (inside source coming from the suns ), shoot your doing a service to other that don't have inside knowledge of the issue and are left in the dark of this situation. Are the info always correct, one can't tell as the info he's recieving is from the suns side right?.

Not all GSW fans are troll btw. I actually enjoyed conversating with you guys here.

collidingNeurons · Post #571 » by **collidingNeurons** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 3:01 am

delsol650 wrote:What GSW fans are giving IHG' crap?
I personally don't like the trade but I do appreciate IGH' for putting info (inside source coming from the suns ), shoot your doing a service to other that don't have inside knowledge of the issue and are left in the dark of this situation. Are the info always correct, one can't tell as the info he's recieving is from the suns side right?.

Not all GSW fans are troll btw. I actually enjoyed conversating with you guys here.

not sure what other people are using as their definition of troll. But you've seemed reasonable and intent on discussion from my point of view. People need to allow for some disagreement and descent otherwise what's the point of a message board, we could all just turn on sportscenter.

DirtyDez · Post #572 » by **DirtyDez** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 3:06 am

the title of this thread needs to be changed

JohnVancouver · Post #573 » by **JohnVancouver** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 3:31 am

aIvin adams wrote:trading amare AND barbosa away would be like trading two testicles for a liver. i dont care if i need the liver i dont want to live w out at least one testicle.

--- Nicely put, my friend. Yes, let us keep at least one ball. This is a good motto.

ray ray · Post #574 » by **ray ray** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 3:37 am

Okay, so what the heck is happening? Did the trade go thru or not? Is curry involve in the trade? And please tell me that barbosa is NOT involve.

hunterxaz · Post #575 » by **hunterxaz** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 3:38 am

nothing is definite right now one way or the other.

Mr. Sun · Post #576 » by **Mr. Sun** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 3:40 am

I think things will be quite from now and until July 8.

Something tells me we haven't heard the last of this trade.

BobbieL · Post #577 » by **BobbieL** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 3:45 am

GO GET TYSON CHANDLER

And if GSW doesn't want to give up Curry - well Steve, still make a good deal - get a 2010 first round pick; have them take Tucker;

So, if they don't want to give up Curry, I suggest the following

Amare/Tucker

Biedrins/Bellinelli/Azi/Wright/2010 first rounder

Wormwood74 · Post #578 » by **Wormwood74** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 3:47 am

Trolls are dead. Everyone knows the only way to kill them is direct exposure to open flame.

Welcome back IHG. Some people around here need to understand the nature of these things is fluid and dynamic. Or, as my uncle used to say:

"Gentlemen, the truth has changed."

"I can be convinced."

Right now, the truth can change 3 times a minute. People can be convinced one minute, then convinced of the opposite the next. Ideas and offers fly thick and fast, and deals get renegged on. I get it.

ranlamjon · Post #579 » by **ranlamjon** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 4:35 am

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=4290870

Sorry but Steph Curry is ours.....

How about AB, Maggette, BWright, Marco and 2010 for Ama're? Is Kerr willing to pull this deal?

I'll keep it crystal clear with you and no sugar-coating; we're keeping Steph and want Ama're. Double dippping in it's rawest form, deal or no deal. We'll wait for Ama're in 2010 if Kerr doesn't pull the trigger in the next 2 weeks.

carey · Post #580 » by **carey** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 4:40 am

No way in hell he signs as an FA in 2010 with you guys. The only chance you have is this trade.