AtheJ415 wrote:Bogyo wrote:AtheJ415 wrote:Also, with the Ingram/Simmons talk I think people are overthinking half court offensive fit. We still want to be a running and gunning team, and Simmons fits that well. He's actually pretty ideal in that role (rebounder who initiates break or can grab it and go the distance). That said, I'm still personally torn on who I'd want if we ended up with the #1 pick.
Same here, as both guys have shown some traits which not really promising. Is it just immaturity of the 18/19yr olds, both phisically and mentaly? If yes will they overcome? My gut feeling is that one of the 2 has a good chance of going the Beasley rout (maybe not China bad, but bust nevertheless). I have no idea which one though.

With how Simmons defends, I wonder if LSU is telling him not to be aggressive so as not to foul out. Honestly it reminds me of high school stars who are so valuable to the offense the coach tells them to never risk fouls. He basically just hangs out and conserves energy.
I agree that one could bust, and because of that I'm currently leaning towards Ingram if we get the 1st pick. He's more projectable position-wise and his length in my opinion gives him the upside defensively over Simmons. It kind of sucks because we really need a 4 more than a 3, and Ingram is probably a 3 in the NBA unless he can gain another 50 pounds. Plus, I like having that size/length at the 3. We'd have a really long PG in Bledsoe, a tall 2 guard in Booker, and a long and tall SF in Ingram, plus Len at the 5. That's really a desirable situation.
I'm somewhat hoping we can get Ingram, then draft a PF with one of our other firsts, or trade one of Bledsoe or Knight for a good young PF who fits our age group.
Have the same feeling with Simmons, a bit too laid back as its soooo easy for him, becouse he is such a gifted player (picking LSU for starters, academic issues, looking generaly not intrested sometimes, and I could go on).
Anyone remember the young Tim Thomas? He had the game come to him so easy that he never really tried hard, hence did not do anything special with his enormus talent. While Simmons is even more talented the way he just "hangs out" as AtheJ pointed out is just a bit scary for a no1 pick.
Ingram will never put on that 50 pounds of muscle, heck I'd be surprised with 30! He is just not that type of dude (having a same type of conversation about Booker in his thread, if anyone cares to take a look). In the games that I've seen he has trouble taking contact near the rim even in college, which makes him a lot less effective especially when his shot is not falling. How will that translate to the NBA?
Plus he just looks stoned sometimes, or is it just me thinking that?
Although I do agree that he has a narrower floor/ceiling than Simmons.
I honestly don't know who should we take if we are no1.