Re: Welcome Jusuf Nurkić
Posted: Mon Oct 9, 2023 11:11 pm
Fit doesn't get talked about enough. Neither does the fact that the trade was not 1 for 1 Nurk for Ayton
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=2321389
I’m shocked, more straw man arguments from slim. No one said Nurk was better than Ayton, literally no one, ever. Btw since you ignored my last post did you want to put a signature bet down on wether Beal will avg more than KD this year or are you tip toeing through the tulips on that one already? After all, you are always right so no sweat off your back ya?Slim Charless wrote:Fo-Real wrote:Slim Charless wrote:
I'm fine with moving Ayton. The return needed to be better and for a not crappy player. Nurk is a net negative and if you think he's better than Ayton then you're on PCP.
If you extract me saying Nurk is better from what I wrote then you are full on (Please Use More Appropriate Word). To sum up, I said Ayton made little impact.
I wasn't focusing purely on you. That comment was meant for anyone who thinks that. Nurk is not better than Ayton.
sunsbum wrote:I’m shocked, more straw man arguments from slim. No one said Nurk was better than Ayton, literally no one, ever. Btw since you ignored my last post did you want to put a signature bet down on wether Beal will avg more than KD this year or are you tip towing through the tulips on that one already? After all, you are always right so no sweat off your back ya?Slim Charless wrote:Fo-Real wrote:
If you extract me saying Nurk is better from what I wrote then you are full on (Please Use More Appropriate Word). To sum up, I said Ayton made little impact.
I wasn't focusing purely on you. That comment was meant for anyone who thinks that. Nurk is not better than Ayton.
That’s like the 3rd time you bent at the knee. It never gets old. Another day, another slumcharles side step. If you decided to put your money where your mouth is let me know, KD vs Beal PPG you got Beal. Oink OinkSlim Charless wrote:sunsbum wrote:I’m shocked, more straw man arguments from slim. No one said Nurk was better than Ayton, literally no one, ever. Btw since you ignored my last post did you want to put a signature bet down on wether Beal will avg more than KD this year or are you tip towing through the tulips on that one already? After all, you are always right so no sweat off your back ya?Slim Charless wrote:
I wasn't focusing purely on you. That comment was meant for anyone who thinks that. Nurk is not better than Ayton.
Bro, you can't expect me to keep track of all of the nonsense you spew, I ignored the post thinking you were talking about doing filthy things with pigs again.
I am happy you've come off that silliness about me being wrong "about literally everything" lol....however, I do my betting in Vegas or on a sportsbook. Not some silly AV/sig bet. You'll notice I don't even have one....that's how little I care. I don't even have an idea of what I'd put on yours.
Take your broke boy bet to your fellow anti-Ayton buddies.
sunsbum wrote:That’s like the 3rd time you bent at the knee. It never gets old. Another day, another slumcharles side step. If you decided to put your money where your mouth is let me know, KD vs Beal PPG you got Beal. Oink OinkSlim Charless wrote:sunsbum wrote: I’m shocked, more straw man arguments from slim. No one said Nurk was better than Ayton, literally no one, ever. Btw since you ignored my last post did you want to put a signature bet down on wether Beal will avg more than KD this year or are you tip towing through the tulips on that one already? After all, you are always right so no sweat off your back ya?
Bro, you can't expect me to keep track of all of the nonsense you spew, I ignored the post thinking you were talking about doing filthy things with pigs again.
I am happy you've come off that silliness about me being wrong "about literally everything" lol....however, I do my betting in Vegas or on a sportsbook. Not some silly AV/sig bet. You'll notice I don't even have one....that's how little I care. I don't even have an idea of what I'd put on yours.
Take your broke boy bet to your fellow anti-Ayton buddies.
sunsbum wrote:I’m shocked, more straw man arguments from slim. No one said Nurk was better than Ayton, literally no one, ever. Btw since you ignored my last post did you want to put a signature bet down on wether Beal will avg more than KD this year or are you tip toeing through the tulips on that one already? After all, you are always right so no sweat off your back ya?Slim Charless wrote:Fo-Real wrote:
If you extract me saying Nurk is better from what I wrote then you are full on (Please Use More Appropriate Word). To sum up, I said Ayton made little impact.
I wasn't focusing purely on you. That comment was meant for anyone who thinks that. Nurk is not better than Ayton.
Slim Charless wrote:sunsbum wrote:I’m shocked, more straw man arguments from slim. No one said Nurk was better than Ayton, literally no one, ever. Btw since you ignored my last post did you want to put a signature bet down on wether Beal will avg more than KD this year or are you tip toeing through the tulips on that one already? After all, you are always right so no sweat off your back ya?Slim Charless wrote:
I wasn't focusing purely on you. That comment was meant for anyone who thinks that. Nurk is not better than Ayton.
Blah, blah, blah. Boring words from a boring poster.
a) Nurk still sucks.
b) Your posts still suck.
c) See (a)
Slim Charless wrote:Fo-Real wrote:Slim Charless wrote:
I'm fine with moving Ayton. The return needed to be better and for a not crappy player. Nurk is a net negative and if you think he's better than Ayton then you're on PCP.
If you extract me saying Nurk is better from what I wrote then you are full on (Please Use More Appropriate Word). To sum up, I said Ayton made little impact.
I wasn't focusing purely on you. That comment was meant for anyone who thinks that. Nurk is not better than Ayton.
bigfoot wrote:
Not a lot of chatter about this last night in the game thread but I certainly did appreciate the bully ball.
bigfoot wrote:
Not a lot of chatter about this last night in the game thread but I certainly did appreciate the bully ball.
Mulhollanddrive wrote:Bit worried so far he looks to be a spectator around the rim on defense, hope he's just getting use to things.
enigmatics wrote:Mulhollanddrive wrote:Bit worried so far he looks to be a spectator around the rim on defense, hope he's just getting use to things.
Too early for that. He's still learning Vogel's defense and the Big 3 weren't playing to help with rotations. That being said he's looked a step slower than normal because of it.
I'd wait a good 15-20 games into the reg season for better insight.
lilfishi22 wrote:bigfoot wrote:
Not a lot of chatter about this last night in the game thread but I certainly did appreciate the bully ball.
Let's just say, I'm happy there weren't a half dozen jab-jab-pull up routines
enigmatics wrote:Mulhollanddrive wrote:Bit worried so far he looks to be a spectator around the rim on defense, hope he's just getting use to things.
Too early for that. He's still learning Vogel's defense and the Big 3 weren't playing to help with rotations. That being said he's looked a step slower than normal because of it.
I'd wait a good 15-20 games into the reg season for better insight.
PerkinsFor3 wrote:enigmatics wrote:Mulhollanddrive wrote:Bit worried so far he looks to be a spectator around the rim on defense, hope he's just getting use to things.
Too early for that. He's still learning Vogel's defense and the Big 3 weren't playing to help with rotations. That being said he's looked a step slower than normal because of it.
I'd wait a good 15-20 games into the reg season for better insight.
Sure wait 20 games until you realize Nurk is indeed a step slower than you'd want, and a spectator on defense.