m1chal wrote:All the joys of the offseason in full display. Now that SL is over it's going to be even worse. OMG...
Well at least we got the Olympic team to look forward to.(Secretly hoping someone gets injured and Booker replaces them).
Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez

m1chal wrote:All the joys of the offseason in full display. Now that SL is over it's going to be even worse. OMG...

lilfishi22 wrote:I think his ceiling is Lamar Odom without the D. His passing at this position will be better suited in this era of basketball than those in the past but his lack of range is going to hurt him big time.
TASTIC wrote:lilfishi22 wrote:I think his ceiling is Lamar Odom without the D. His passing at this position will be better suited in this era of basketball than those in the past but his lack of range is going to hurt him big time.
I know the comparison has been said a lot - but I completely agree, I just don't see the LeBron or any other superstar.
Odom, and there's nothing wrong with that as long as he keeps his head on straight.
asudevil wrote:What have i just read over the past 4+ pages?
It's terrible on every front.
I'm sorry, but we spent the good part of the past 5 pages arguing what is considered a TROLL? Then we have guys who think Booker is over-rated at AGE 19, and someone calling out fans thinking Gerald freaking Green was thought of as a top 5 talent?
I stopped seriously reading a good 6 pages ago, and just skimmed over the garbage....and what i read was truly that.
Frank Lee wrote:Does it concern anyone that we have absolutely no inside game? No low post scoring what so ever? Even our guards can't really body up on someone. This squad has all the makings of a 3ball small ball gimmicky chuckfest..... but.... at least we have the shooters.

Frank Lee wrote:Does it concern anyone that we have absolutely no inside game? No low post scoring what so ever? Even our guards can't really body up on someone. This squad has all the makings of a 3ball small ball gimmicky chuckfest..... but.... at least we have the shooters.
MathiasPW wrote:PJ Tucker is not so bad in the paint as well.
That's where he took most his shots last season at a meh clip of 51%
http://nbasavant.com/player.php?player_id=200782
Zelaznyrules wrote:MathiasPW wrote:PJ Tucker is not so bad in the paint as well.
That's where he took most his shots last season at a meh clip of 51%
http://nbasavant.com/player.php?player_id=200782
I'm sure most of those came from put backs and fast breaks. He's not exactly an option if you're looking to dump the ball to your low post scorer for a safe basket. And, you're right, 51% from there is very meh indeed.
), PJ actually can get a hook shot in or back his defender with his body to create some space.
JTrain wrote:Booker quickly became our most overrated player. Not that I'm not glad to have him, but he wasn't higher than 8th on our team in the major advanced stats (VORP, BMP, WS/48, PER). He passes the "eye test" which is usually an indication of being better on offense than defense.
Yes, I know he's still young. It will be interesting to see how he improves this year. I don't currently envision him becoming an All-Star-level player, but I hope I'm wrong.
MathiasPW wrote:Zelaznyrules wrote:MathiasPW wrote:PJ Tucker is not so bad in the paint as well.
That's where he took most his shots last season at a meh clip of 51%
http://nbasavant.com/player.php?player_id=200782
I'm sure most of those came from put backs and fast breaks. He's not exactly an option if you're looking to dump the ball to your low post scorer for a safe basket. And, you're right, 51% from there is very meh indeed.
I won't go as far as to search video, but while most of his shots there are indeed put backs (definitely not fast breaks...the ball always flies away from PJ when he runs a fast break), PJ actually can get a hook shot in or back his defender with his body to create some space.
His percentage is also low because he has several very contested shots when he manages to grab those power rebounds amidst three defenders.
carey wrote:JTrain wrote:Booker quickly became our most overrated player. Not that I'm not glad to have him, but he wasn't higher than 8th on our team in the major advanced stats (VORP, BMP, WS/48, PER). He passes the "eye test" which is usually an indication of being better on offense than defense.
Yes, I know he's still young. It will be interesting to see how he improves this year. I don't currently envision him becoming an All-Star-level player, but I hope I'm wrong.
His shooting percentages took a bad turn when he spent long stretches playing with the following 4 players, Ronnie Price, PJ Tucker, Alex Len and Tyson Chandler. He was basically the offense for the last quarter of the season, and he was defended like it. If he doesn't become an All-Star something went horribly wrong.
Zelaznyrules wrote: And he also had to play out of position often during that stretch when Bledsoe, Knight and Price were all injured. Just looking at stats and ignoring the reasons, it's clear Booker didn't have a great season. But watching the games you could see how special this kid is now and should become. And it wasn't just us homer fans that thought so, every big name 2 and 3 in the game raved about him.
carey wrote:Zelaznyrules wrote: And he also had to play out of position often during that stretch when Bledsoe, Knight and Price were all injured. Just looking at stats and ignoring the reasons, it's clear Booker didn't have a great season. But watching the games you could see how special this kid is now and should become. And it wasn't just us homer fans that thought so, every big name 2 and 3 in the game raved about him.
By whose standards? That was a fantastic rookie season by a 19 year old.
saintEscaton wrote:I mean I'm trying to find the silver lining, but there is nothing on paper that seperates our core from the rest of the pack. I'd take Minny/Philly any day of the week due to top shelf talent and Denver is right up there cauz I think Jokic could be better than Porzingis. I would probably takes ours over the Laker's. Randle is Thomas Robinson 2.0, Nance is a nice rotation big, DLo may not cut it at point he is more of a Ginoblisque playmaking off guard but won't have his size advnatage there. Zubac was a steal he is only 19 and has a fully developed body and polished footwork, Ingram will have growing pains but already has NBA 3pt range, dynamic iso scorer and more burst off the bounce than advertised

Frank Lee wrote:Does it concern anyone that we have absolutely no inside game? No low post scoring what so ever? Even our guards can't really body up on someone. This squad has all the makings of a 3ball small ball gimmicky chuckfest..... but.... at least we have the shooters.
carey wrote:It is 2-time, every time.