ImageImageImage

Season Speculation, Trade Ideas & Discussion Pt. 4

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez

What direction would you like the front office to take?

Keep developing young guys and keep first rounders
74
73%
Trade our 18 first/Jackson and whatever else for best player available
11
11%
Trade whatever it takes for vet PG and maybe also vet PF
9
9%
Trade vets for expiring contracts and 2nd rounders
7
7%
 
Total votes: 101

User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,170
And1: 61,016
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Season Speculation, Trade Ideas & Discussion Pt. 4 

Post#641 » by bwgood77 » Thu Dec 14, 2017 7:15 pm

ginobiliflops wrote:
LukasBMW wrote:Stuff like this:

https://www.theringer.com/nba/2017/12/11/16760590/lebron-james-houston-rockets-free-agency

Is the reason why we should continue to tank just a few more years.

Philly and Minnesota are the scariest young teams in the NBA and they got that way by tanking.

A few more years of pain guys. And remember, Philly wasted lotto picks on Okafor, Noel, and MCW. They hit on Embiid, Simmmons. They kinda hit on Saric. Jury is out on Fultz.

We wasted picks on Len, We hit on Booker. We kinda hit on TJ.

We just need one more hit. ONE more hit. PLUS we need one of JJ/Chriss/Bender to get it together.


Given the odds of us actually getting a top 3 pick (never happened in 50 years) and us then hitting on said prospect, is it really worth throwing years away to play the lottery? At some point there has to be a better strategy than hedging all of our bets into Powerball tickets.


Something has really gone wrong with a sport when fans of so many teams actually have a rooting interest in their team losing.
Desertfox
Pro Prospect
Posts: 875
And1: 856
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
     

Re: Season Speculation, Trade Ideas & Discussion Pt. 4 

Post#642 » by Desertfox » Thu Dec 14, 2017 7:37 pm

Why do people keep hating on Len and wanting a defensive rebounding center in the draft at the same time? Why not try to resign him on a team friendly deal long term, and then we can use the draft pick on someone different like say Ayton or Doncic.

How about trying to sign Aaron Gordon in the offseason? That frees up one of the PFs for a trade (preferable Chriss)

And we could try to draft Mikal Bridges with the second pick, which frees up either of the two SFs for a trade.

You do all that and now you have one of Chriss/Bender, one of Jackson/Warren, the two Miami, and the Milwaukee pick available to trade for a good veteran PG (Dragic wouldn't be too expensive...).

You can roll out a lineup of:
Veteran PG (Dragic?), Ulis
Booker, Reed
Jackson/Bender, Bridges
Gordon, Bender/Chriss
Ayton, Len/Williams

Good mix of shooting and defense, clear rolls and a decent mix of youth and experience, and should be doable with our available assets.
Saberestar
RealGM
Posts: 22,373
And1: 17,007
Joined: May 21, 2010

Re: Season Speculation, Trade Ideas & Discussion Pt. 4 

Post#643 » by Saberestar » Thu Dec 14, 2017 7:53 pm

Gordon is gonna get the max from the Magic. He is a RFA. Impossible to sign him. Not an option.
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Season Speculation, Trade Ideas & Discussion Pt. 4 

Post#644 » by WeekapaugGroove » Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:18 pm

ginobiliflops wrote:
LukasBMW wrote:Stuff like this:

https://www.theringer.com/nba/2017/12/11/16760590/lebron-james-houston-rockets-free-agency

Is the reason why we should continue to tank just a few more years.

Philly and Minnesota are the scariest young teams in the NBA and they got that way by tanking.

A few more years of pain guys. And remember, Philly wasted lotto picks on Okafor, Noel, and MCW. They hit on Embiid, Simmmons. They kinda hit on Saric. Jury is out on Fultz.

We wasted picks on Len, We hit on Booker. We kinda hit on TJ.

We just need one more hit. ONE more hit. PLUS we need one of JJ/Chriss/Bender to get it together.


Given the odds of us actually getting a top 3 pick (never happened in 50 years) and us then hitting on said prospect, is it really worth throwing years away to play the lottery? At some point there has to be a better strategy than hedging all of our bets into Powerball tickets.


Sure odds are long but I would say the odds of the suns adding a franchise changer in the 2018 draft are higher than them adding a franchise changer by trading that pick. Guys who hit the trade market are typically older and in the last years of their contracts so you need the perfect storm of the right guy becoming available and most importantly wanting to be here longterm. Most of the time you need to get good organically before guys want to come.

From a contractual standpoint it's pretty easy to see why hitting on a draft pick is better than trading them for a "star". If you hit on a pick you get that guy on a cheap rookie deal for 4 years making it easier to add talent around them plus you get the early extending rights and no player has EVER turned down a max rookie extension so you basically get that player for his first 8-9 years in the league.

If you trade for a start that guy will probably already be making $20M+ per year limiting what you can do to add talent around them plus you are typically getting them on the last year or two on their deal so you better have a good team around them from day 1 or you really run the risk of that guy leaving you for nothing.

Now it is good to use all methods of talent acquisition there have been plenty of younger players traded or in FA that could have helped make this team better. Yet at this point after 5 years of this regime there isn't a single guy on this team added via trade or UFA that will be a part of the core moving forward. That's not good.
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
Saberestar
RealGM
Posts: 22,373
And1: 17,007
Joined: May 21, 2010

Re: Season Speculation, Trade Ideas & Discussion Pt. 4 

Post#645 » by Saberestar » Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:38 pm

Read on Twitter
TeamTragic
General Manager
Posts: 9,000
And1: 7,028
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
 

Re: Season Speculation, Trade Ideas & Discussion Pt. 4 

Post#646 » by TeamTragic » Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:40 pm

Hesh wrote:I don't know if this has been mentioned. But the "sarverout" billboard is up. Made by contributions from fans on another board. :lol:

Image
Image
Image


That looks amazing :lol:
User avatar
lilfishi22
Forum Mod - Suns
Forum Mod - Suns
Posts: 36,245
And1: 24,603
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Location: Australia

Re: Season Speculation, Trade Ideas & Discussion Pt. 4 

Post#647 » by lilfishi22 » Thu Dec 14, 2017 9:16 pm

ginobiliflops wrote:
LukasBMW wrote:Stuff like this:

https://www.theringer.com/nba/2017/12/11/16760590/lebron-james-houston-rockets-free-agency

Is the reason why we should continue to tank just a few more years.

Philly and Minnesota are the scariest young teams in the NBA and they got that way by tanking.

A few more years of pain guys. And remember, Philly wasted lotto picks on Okafor, Noel, and MCW. They hit on Embiid, Simmmons. They kinda hit on Saric. Jury is out on Fultz.

We wasted picks on Len, We hit on Booker. We kinda hit on TJ.

We just need one more hit. ONE more hit. PLUS we need one of JJ/Chriss/Bender to get it together.


Given the odds of us actually getting a top 3 pick (never happened in 50 years) and us then hitting on said prospect, is it really worth throwing years away to play the lottery? At some point there has to be a better strategy than hedging all of our bets into Powerball tickets.

Bet on Booker
Damkac
Analyst
Posts: 3,143
And1: 3,062
Joined: Apr 18, 2011
Location: Poland

Re: Season Speculation, Trade Ideas & Discussion Pt. 4 

Post#648 » by Damkac » Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:35 pm

MilotheSlayer wrote:Two things I'd like to see happen before the deadline.
1. I'd like to see us figure out our center spot. Ideally for me we trade either Chandler or Monroe. I'd then like to start Len the rest of the year. Give him his time to prove himself. He's played well all year in my opinion and his simplified game has really helped him on the floor.

2. I want to see Dudley get more minutes. He always makes the extra pass and guys feed off of his energy. He's a pro's pro and a vocal leader from the bench. But I think our young guys can learn a lot from him when he is on the floor. Guys like Bender/Chriss/Jackson/Reed could all learn a few things from Dudley's game. His willingness to make the extra pass and his underrated defensive impact.

Even if one of these happens I'd be a happy man.

Agree and agree.
Suns should start Dudley and tell Chriss and Bender if they want minutes they must earn them. Work hard on practice to play, work hard on the floor to play more minutes. Be lazy or make dumb mistakes and go to the bench.
Waylay13
Rookie
Posts: 1,165
And1: 934
Joined: Apr 10, 2016
 

Re: Season Speculation, Trade Ideas & Discussion Pt. 4 

Post#649 » by Waylay13 » Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:39 pm

ginobiliflops wrote:
LukasBMW wrote:Stuff like this:

https://www.theringer.com/nba/2017/12/11/16760590/lebron-james-houston-rockets-free-agency

Is the reason why we should continue to tank just a few more years.

Philly and Minnesota are the scariest young teams in the NBA and they got that way by tanking.

A few more years of pain guys. And remember, Philly wasted lotto picks on Okafor, Noel, and MCW. They hit on Embiid, Simmmons. They kinda hit on Saric. Jury is out on Fultz.

We wasted picks on Len, We hit on Booker. We kinda hit on TJ.

We just need one more hit. ONE more hit. PLUS we need one of JJ/Chriss/Bender to get it together.


Given the odds of us actually getting a top 3 pick (never happened in 50 years) and us then hitting on said prospect, is it really worth throwing years away to play the lottery? At some point there has to be a better strategy than hedging all of our bets into Powerball tickets.


is playing the lottery worst then late lottery and first round exits? Personally first round exits make things worst from my point of because you arent attracting good players and arent getting good picks. The Odds of getting a good lottery pick is a lot better then getting a superstar in the mid-range of the draft.
Just say no to idiots!!
User avatar
RaisingArizona
RealGM
Posts: 15,788
And1: 7,669
Joined: Apr 23, 2009
 

Re: Season Speculation, Trade Ideas & Discussion Pt. 4 

Post#650 » by RaisingArizona » Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:47 pm

lilfishi22 wrote:
ginobiliflops wrote:
LukasBMW wrote:Stuff like this:

https://www.theringer.com/nba/2017/12/11/16760590/lebron-james-houston-rockets-free-agency

Is the reason why we should continue to tank just a few more years.

Philly and Minnesota are the scariest young teams in the NBA and they got that way by tanking.

A few more years of pain guys. And remember, Philly wasted lotto picks on Okafor, Noel, and MCW. They hit on Embiid, Simmmons. They kinda hit on Saric. Jury is out on Fultz.

We wasted picks on Len, We hit on Booker. We kinda hit on TJ.

We just need one more hit. ONE more hit. PLUS we need one of JJ/Chriss/Bender to get it together.


Given the odds of us actually getting a top 3 pick (never happened in 50 years) and us then hitting on said prospect, is it really worth throwing years away to play the lottery? At some point there has to be a better strategy than hedging all of our bets into Powerball tickets.

Bet on Booker

I agree. But some would rather wait till he's 28 to put a team around him :crazy:
Image
User avatar
RaisingArizona
RealGM
Posts: 15,788
And1: 7,669
Joined: Apr 23, 2009
 

Re: Season Speculation, Trade Ideas & Discussion Pt. 4 

Post#651 » by RaisingArizona » Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:52 pm

Desertfox wrote:Why do people keep hating on Len and wanting a defensive rebounding center in the draft at the same time? Why not try to resign him on a team friendly deal long term, and then we can use the draft pick on someone different like say Ayton or Doncic.


When we offered Len the QO, it pretty much assured he is gone. I think we all know that he is gone.


Desertfox wrote:How about trying to sign Aaron Gordon in the offseason? That frees up one of the PFs for a trade (preferable Chriss)


Won't be available.


Desertfox wrote:You can roll out a lineup of:
Veteran PG (Dragic?), Ulis
Booker, Reed
Jackson/Bender, Bridges
Gordon, Bender/Chriss
Ayton, Len/Williams


Dragic? Hmm, for some reason I don't think all of King Henry's gold will be enough to bring him back.
Image
Saberestar
RealGM
Posts: 22,373
And1: 17,007
Joined: May 21, 2010

Re: Season Speculation, Trade Ideas & Discussion Pt. 4 

Post#652 » by Saberestar » Thu Dec 14, 2017 11:00 pm

ginobiliflops wrote:
lilfishi22 wrote:
ginobiliflops wrote:
Given the odds of us actually getting a top 3 pick (never happened in 50 years) and us then hitting on said prospect, is it really worth throwing years away to play the lottery? At some point there has to be a better strategy than hedging all of our bets into Powerball tickets.

Bet on Booker

I agree. But some would rather wait till he's 28 to put a team around him :crazy:

Yeah, 2020 is too close...we are trying to compete in 2025. ENJOY!
:cry:
NavLDO
Suns Forum Defensive Player of the Year
Posts: 2,749
And1: 1,436
Joined: Aug 25, 2014
     

Re: Season Speculation, Trade Ideas & Discussion Pt. 4 

Post#653 » by NavLDO » Thu Dec 14, 2017 11:02 pm

lilfishi22 wrote:
LukasBMW wrote:
lilfishi22 wrote:I hated that approach when we drafted them. Looking back I wish we didn't make the trade. Pretty much the top talents at that part of the draft (mid lotto) were bigs and that left us with only a few options. There wasn't a ton of value in the top 10 while there were some decent prospects in the late lotto which I would've preferred we stayed.

All in all, it just seems like a waste of a pick if our approach was to draft two bigs to see if we can hit on one. Either you hit on both and have to make a decision on what to do, both bust and you're left with two wasted picks or one bust while the other doesn't and you've spent two top 10 picks hoping to hit on one single position.


I usually agree with you on everything, but I think the move was genius.

Did we win the Sac trade? Too early to tell. Could we have drafted another guy? Too early to tell (and truthfully, no one else drafted later looks all that much better except maybe Murray).

Stretch 4'/5's with superstar potential are had to find. We had a chance to double our odds at a hit. Can't go wrong there especially since the failure rate is so high.

If they both pan out, then maybe one of them will end up playing center.

I'm not against the trade, in a vacuum. It was a great move because whenever you can move into the top 10 while not giving up too much, you should probably do it. I'm against what we did with the pick. As I said, I didn't like most of the talent available at that mid-lotto part of the draft and there weren't any value there. At that 13-18 mark, I thought there were more guys I would've preferred we had taken a flyer on. So I'm not criticizing the trade, I'm against what we did once the trade was made.

People would argue against me and say we didn't give up much to get into that #8 spot but to me, that was just a part of the draft I didn't want to draft at. Especially if we gave up assets to draft two guys in the same position, it just makes the trade worse. I feel like whenever you give up assets to move up in the top 10 of the draft draft you better be damn sure about the player you're picking. This is why I wish we hadn't made the trade.

We picked who we wanted so it is what it is


I'm with you. Not a big fan of doubling down on two guys who play the same position who both had huge question marks and need for development coming in to the league. Chriss was definitely the last of that 'tier' of prospects, so it was then or none, but now we have two guys that need development minutes...badly...and no real development plan for either, it seems.

Hindsight is 20/20 for a reason, and we can always look back and say 'well,it was a horrible decision' and 'we drafted horribly', but I do not think that is the case at all; McD made solid BPA choices and moves, but right now, it just doesn't look great because how we/they look right now. Two years from now, we may all have a very different perspective, though I am still holding out hope that McD trades one between now and the start of next season.
User avatar
batsmasher
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 3,284
And1: 2,231
Joined: Nov 26, 2012
Location: Melbourne, Australia
 

Re: Season Speculation, Trade Ideas & Discussion Pt. 4 

Post#654 » by batsmasher » Thu Dec 14, 2017 11:42 pm

At some stage we have to stop giving McD credit for his failing picks because "everyone else liked him too". The whole challenge of drafting is being smarter than that. A miss is a miss, whether it be an airball or a rim out.

And as I said in the off season, trading Bled for a pick in the most recent draft was a GIMME move which never happened. Imagine having another one of those guys in the draft now and think about how differently we'd be framing this conversation.
Image
de'aaron fox will be a hof'er, don't @ me
User avatar
lilfishi22
Forum Mod - Suns
Forum Mod - Suns
Posts: 36,245
And1: 24,603
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Location: Australia

Re: Season Speculation, Trade Ideas & Discussion Pt. 4 

Post#655 » by lilfishi22 » Fri Dec 15, 2017 12:27 am

batsmasher wrote:At some stage we have to stop giving McD credit for his failing picks because "everyone else liked him too". The whole challenge of drafting is being smarter than that. A miss is a miss, whether it be an airball or a rim out.

And as I said in the off season, trading Bled for a pick in the most recent draft was a GIMME move which never happened. Imagine having another one of those guys in the draft now and think about how differently we'd be framing this conversation.

Hard to know how close a Mudiay + DEN 1st was to actually happening but I think we can all be pretty confident in saying we would've gotten a decent amount more before he stopped wanting to be here.

Also I do agree with you about the crowd mentality when it comes to making picks.
Saberestar
RealGM
Posts: 22,373
And1: 17,007
Joined: May 21, 2010

Re: Season Speculation, Trade Ideas & Discussion Pt. 4 

Post#656 » by Saberestar » Fri Dec 15, 2017 12:43 am

General Manager Ryan McDonough said that while Phoenix will look for ways to upgrade its roster, its focus is on doing that internally as players return from injuries.

The Suns are hopeful Devin Booker (strained left adductor muscle) will be back for the Dec. 26 game against Memphis and that rookie shooting guard Davon Reed (offseason knee surgery) will return around Jan. 1. Center Alan Williams, who had surgery in August to repair a torn meniscus, could be back sometime in March.

“If we do make a move it will be positionally to fill a short-term need,” McDonough said. “There’s nobody we can sign or trade for that’s going to come close to replicating half of Devin Booker’s production. Nobody out there is 22 years old and like Davon Reed, who we’re really high on. So we’re most excited about getting those guys back.”

“Those guys (Chandler and Dudley) mentor the young guys and teach the young guys how to play,” McDonough said. “If and when they get on the court they do a good job. If they’re not playing much or at all they accept that.

“I think it’s very important to have them echo and reinforce some of the messages our coaches are trying to deliver. I think in general you want to keep at least a few good vets around and we’re happy with those guys.”

https://www.azcentral.com/story/sports/nba/suns/2017/12/14/phoenix-suns-trade-devin-booker-free-agents-tyson-chandler/951742001/

So the same roster for the next 52 games.
User avatar
lilfishi22
Forum Mod - Suns
Forum Mod - Suns
Posts: 36,245
And1: 24,603
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Location: Australia

Re: Season Speculation, Trade Ideas & Discussion Pt. 4 

Post#657 » by lilfishi22 » Fri Dec 15, 2017 12:58 am

bwgood77 wrote:
lilfishi22 wrote:I'm saying everything should be on the table. What if that top 5 pick ends up being a dud. What if JJ never works out his weaknesses? On the topic of Kyrie....the Celtics 23-6 and he's 2nd in the league in clutch time...

No offense but holding so much stock in all of these picks and young players and assume they'll take us to the promised land in 2020 and beyond is just as much of a potential disaster as throwing away all the picks. People look at Philly like all they did was tanked perfectly and now they have Simmons, Fultz and Embiid and forget they also whiffed on Okafor, Noel, Turner and MCW. It's taken us 4 years to realise the guy we drafted at #5 in 2013 is a dud while our two best players were drafted #13 and #14... Bender, Chriss, JJ are all up in the air and we probably will be patient and won't know what we really have until few seasons down the line. At this point, Bender and Chriss aren't exactly trending upwards and that's a scary thought. JJ has shown some flashes and has had some productive games but has largely been disappointing. Not the end of the world since he's young and we're only 30 or so games into the season but at this point you have as much evidence to say he might be the best player from this draft in 5yrs as anyone who thinks he could be the biggest bust in this draft. The reason I'm not against picking outside of the top 5 or even top 10 as a result of playing competitive basketball is because McD doesn't have a great draft record when he has a high pick anyway.

For the tankers who think doing anything that isn't tanking is 'shortsighted', think that non-tankers are advocating trading away everything just to add a few wins or that this Timeline is foolproof if we just keep sucking and keeping picking high, you're wrong.

Let's not be so blinded by this 2020 plan that McD trotted out a couple of seasons ago and think that a good plan then is still a good plan now or next season. If Booker plateaued as an inefficient 15ppg scorer who does nothing else and TJ only became a spark off the bench and nothing more (two entirely likely cases for #13 and #14 picks), then fine, keep tanking. But Booker has upped his efficiency across the board, he's rebounding better, he's making plays for his team mates and he's shown he can be a lethal 4th quarter assassin. TJ is a reliable 18ppg scorer on good efficiency (even without a 3PT shot) and much improved defense. We have two guys on this team that's ready to play competitive basketball but with team mates who aren't 2 years away from being 2 years away. Doesn't that alone prompt a review of this 2020 plan? My preference is that we start building a competitive team this offseason. If something comes along midseason that would make us competitive, let's dip into that stockpile of picks we have and get deals done. Not saying we need to trade all our assets away to try and contend but let's start building a fringe playoff team. Let's develop what we already have and let's focus on Booker.


I think people who want to develop the young guys and pick through the draft are fine with trying to get competitive this off season as well. This summer we possibly flirted with adding guys (Griffin, Millsap, Irving, all of which are currently out, interestingly enough), but we decided to stick with the young guys.

No one predicted the Watson and coaching disaster though...and while some felt the Bledsoe ending would be bad, I don't think anyone expected it to go down quite that way. So the team is awful to watch due to the lack of a PG and basically the lack of anything resembling a decent head coach for the rookie year and first offseason for Bender and Chriss.

It's ugly and can be disappointing to watch, and it would be nice to have a decent vet PG who liked to pass and get others involved more but I'm not sure what's out there other than maybe George Hill. Of course if we went that route it leaves us out of FA this summer in all likelihood.

The problem with young guys under performing to an extent you want to put them on the table for trade is that it likely also means their probable trade return value is extremely low as well.

I won't be surprised if we scramble and do a trade mid season, because there is a good chance Sarver feels the same way you do and doesn't want to stand around and wait for McD's high picks not to pan out.

I definitely think our best chance to improve the team over the long term though is to keep our picks right now and use them wisely and let Booker be the leader of the guys we build beneath him.

And you made some good points about the Sixers having some bad picks...like we did with Len...just because they struck out with MCW, Noel, Okafor, an injured Embiid they didn't just throw in the towel and say "High picks suck! We can't make the right ones!" and trade them. They used them and ended up with Simmons and Fultz...and they were patient with Embiid after him showing nothing for a couple years.

I think they are glad they did keep the picks.

I see your perspective and for the record, I'm not against keeping our picks and other assets. I'm against holding onto them resolutely because they were part of a plan set out two years ago. Above all moves, I think the most important move we can make is not to bring a star player but to bring in a legitimate coach. Kyrie is very similar to Booker in that they both have their defensive struggles and both have been accused of having a one track (scoring) mind at times but an elite coach like Steven has gotten Kyrie to play better team ball without sacrificing or hurting what he's great at. I believe in Booker and I think our best course of action to develop him into a true star is to play the right way. If we can't get an elite coach then I think the next best way to play the right way is to put players with experience around him to show him how to win games. This is why I'm not against taking vets who's near the end of their prime or doesn't necessarily fit the timeline (Gasol? Rubio? Hill?) because even though they can still contribute at a high level, they aren't taking anything from Booker's game. Some fans have this notion that we don't need a PG because Booker can be a do it all Harden-esque player but I don't see why Booker can't still be developing that part of his game while also playing more efficiently next to another floor general like a Hill/Rubio. It doesn't hurt Booker to have another competent vet PG who can guide him and show him how to lead.

Regarding our assets, I probably wouldn't give up a 1st for Hill or Rubio but Schroeder? Payton? McConnell? Let's talk
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,170
And1: 61,016
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Season Speculation, Trade Ideas & Discussion Pt. 4 

Post#658 » by bwgood77 » Fri Dec 15, 2017 12:58 am

Feels like there is always an easy cop out answer. Do you think you will do anything to improve the team? "Yes, I think the team will improve internally when Booker comes back."

OK, thanks for the info.

-in response to the azcentral article
NavLDO
Suns Forum Defensive Player of the Year
Posts: 2,749
And1: 1,436
Joined: Aug 25, 2014
     

Re: Season Speculation, Trade Ideas & Discussion Pt. 4 

Post#659 » by NavLDO » Fri Dec 15, 2017 1:10 am

batsmasher wrote:At some stage we have to stop giving McD credit for his failing picks because "everyone else liked him too". The whole challenge of drafting is being smarter than that. A miss is a miss, whether it be an airball or a rim out.

And as I said in the off season, trading Bled for a pick in the most recent draft was a GIMME move which never happened. Imagine having another one of those guys in the draft now and think about how differently we'd be framing this conversation.


Sure. And as soon as Bender, Chriss, and JJ turn 23/24YO and have been in the league for at least 3 years. Until then, I think I'll wait until they can all celebrate a good win with a beer!
User avatar
lilfishi22
Forum Mod - Suns
Forum Mod - Suns
Posts: 36,245
And1: 24,603
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Location: Australia

Re: Season Speculation, Trade Ideas & Discussion Pt. 4 

Post#660 » by lilfishi22 » Fri Dec 15, 2017 1:45 am

bwgood77 wrote:Feels like there is always an easy cop out answer. Do you think you will do anything to improve the team? "Yes, I think the team will improve internally when Booker comes back."

OK, thanks for the info.

-in response to the azcentral article

You're right but I feel like confidence among our young guys are a bit low atm. None of our young guys have stepped up in Booker's presence and saying he plans on making some moves might not necessarily be a positive for the locker room. Saying they'll be fine when our best player comes back rather than saying he's looking to make changes should help show he's confident in them and they won't need to be thinking their job is in jeopardy.

But of course, I would be disappointed if McD wasn't at least looking at potential moves to improve the team from external sources.

Return to Phoenix Suns