bwgood77 wrote:Saberestar wrote:
I think Ja Morant was 4th in the fan vote. Do you know who was 4th in the media vote?
Donovan Mitchell.
Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez
bwgood77 wrote:Saberestar wrote:
I think Ja Morant was 4th in the fan vote. Do you know who was 4th in the media vote?





Kerrsed wrote:Wasnt the knock on Booker all these years that he was on a losing team, and therefor didnt really "Qualify" to be an All-star?
Memphis is currently out of the playoffs at the #9 spot with an even record, so how is Morant getting these votes ahead of Booker?
Luka has had some amazing games, yet they havent really translated to wins. Mav's are at 13-15. I understand the fan voting (Somewhat), but Player and ESPECIALLY Media voting for him should have been lower, knocking him down from #2 to around #4 or #5.
SGA got 5 from the media???? He tied with Booker and CP3 from the media vote. OKC is a PALTRY 11-17, making them the 2nd worst team in the NBA, yet he got the same amount of votes from the Media as Booker. Funny how we are told that wins matter when Booker loses out year after year after year, and when he finally gets it and deserve it all of a sudden wins no longer matter to these media members who preached for years that wins matter.
And to go even further, i take issue with Donic (And Simmons for that matter) being listed as PG. Im going to put it under a spoiler tag, so if you want to read it than please do so, but the conclusion is Luka is a Point-Forward, not a PG.Spoiler:
Here are the complete vote totals for the West:
Interesting to see Ayton rank #12 in Player votes and Bridges rank #13. Even more interesting to see our own Ty-Shon Alexander get 2 player votes and rank higher than one Ricky Rubio.
I like many other absolutely HATE the fan voting. It will always be skewed towards teams in cities with higher populations along with players on teams that get more TV coverage. I understand why the NBA does it (To drum up hype around the game), but there is no way that the average fans vote should count as much as a players vote or even a media members vote. And its absolutely despicable that the average fans vote counts as much as the player and media vote Combined! No way it should be weighted like that. Joe Blow who sits on his ass voting as much as he wants to everyday shouldnt be 50% of the reason that a player becomes an all-star. Sure, keep the fan vote, but maybe make it only worth 25% of the overall vote. Make the Players vote mater more, as they are the ones that play with and against these guys everyday.
Kerrsed wrote:Wasnt the knock on Booker all these years that he was on a losing team, and therefor didnt really "Qualify" to be an All-star?
Memphis is currently out of the playoffs at the #9 spot with an even record, so how is Morant getting these votes ahead of Booker?
Luka has had some amazing games, yet they havent really translated to wins. Mav's are at 13-15. I understand the fan voting (Somewhat), but Player and ESPECIALLY Media voting for him should have been lower, knocking him down from #2 to around #4 or #5.
SGA got 5 from the media???? He tied with Booker and CP3 from the media vote. OKC is a PALTRY 11-17, making them the 2nd worst team in the NBA, yet he got the same amount of votes from the Media as Booker. Funny how we are told that wins matter when Booker loses out year after year after year, and when he finally gets it and deserve it all of a sudden wins no longer matter to these media members who preached for years that wins matter.
And to go even further, i take issue with Donic (And Simmons for that matter) being listed as PG. Im going to put it under a spoiler tag, so if you want to read it than please do so, but the conclusion is Luka is a Point-Forward, not a PG.Spoiler:
Here are the complete vote totals for the West:
Interesting to see Ayton rank #12 in Player votes and Bridges rank #13. Even more interesting to see our own Ty-Shon Alexander get 2 player votes and rank higher than one Ricky Rubio.
I like many other absolutely HATE the fan voting. It will always be skewed towards teams in cities with higher populations along with players on teams that get more TV coverage. I understand why the NBA does it (To drum up hype around the game), but there is no way that the average fans vote should count as much as a players vote or even a media members vote. And its absolutely despicable that the average fans vote counts as much as the player and media vote Combined! No way it should be weighted like that. Joe Blow who sits on his ass voting as much as he wants to everyday shouldnt be 50% of the reason that a player becomes an all-star. Sure, keep the fan vote, but maybe make it only worth 25% of the overall vote. Make the Players vote mater more, as they are the ones that play with and against these guys everyday.

nevetsov wrote:Paul =19/3
Morant =20/3
Yet both have an average 6.5, and Morant is ranked higher?

RedIndian wrote:Booker really needs to work on his game in the off-season. His scoring style is like Kobe's or Kawhi's. Mid-range, post-up and trips to the rack are what he's good. Now he's really skilled at these things possessing terrific balance and strength, outstanding finishing ability with both hands, and he's very very good in the midrange.
The trouble is he's not an elite athlete like Kobe, and he doesn't have the length or strength of Kawhi. So in pressure situations, he struggles to get to his spots, because he doesn't have an elite first step or the length to simply shoot over defenders.
Now the solution to that is to be like Paul or Kyrie i.e. have elite ball-handling skills to consistently get separation.
Booker's ball handling is fine as a secondary option, but if he wants to be a first option type player, he really need to improve his ball-handling to be able to consistently create the separation to get his shots. It'll also reduce his turnovers because he loses the ball twice a game at least because of either trying to barrel his way into the paint or a loose handle.
Alternatively, Book accepts that his game is not tailor made to be a first option, and starts playing efficient ball as a second option type scorer, and reserves more energy on defense. He'd actually be amazing at this role - because he's a fantastic shooter off the catch, and very good when his playmaking is restricted to finding open shooters off drive and kicks.
I doubt however that Booker's ego, and the way he has been developed here, allows him to become that player. Which really only leaves one option - he NEEDS to work on becoming a superior ball-handler, and also to become a more pure point guard the way Harden and Doncic are.



TouchPassDario wrote:Not really a snub. Booker was not very good the first half of the year.



Kerrsed wrote:TouchPassDario wrote:Not really a snub. Booker was not very good the first half of the year.
For the record Booker is averaging: 26 Pts, 4.5 Assists, 4 rebounds, while shooting 50% FG and 38% from 3. Thats pretty good. Didnt realize that the AS selection was just based of of the first part of the season.

TouchPassDario wrote:Apparently, AD replacement has to be front court replacement. Should be Mikal.
When you’re not good for half the year then yeah it kinda affects allstar prospects. Thanks for coming to my TedTalk!
Booker is outside top75 on like every advanced metric. Trae’s numbers >>>
Lol counting stats.
