lilfishi22 wrote:Ghost of Kleine wrote:
Not a single thing I've seen so far rationalises accepting the deal they got. Not a single thing
Not one single thing. The league wanted this
Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez
lilfishi22 wrote:Ghost of Kleine wrote:
Not a single thing I've seen so far rationalises accepting the deal they got. Not a single thing
MrMiyagi wrote:Watch LA trade LeBron for like Zion or some ****.
Saberestar wrote:Adelson ( Luka) and the Wolves owner ( Towns) traded their stars who were drafted for their own teams and stayed loyal to the franchise JUST TO SAVE MONEY primary probably can give you another point of view when analyzing what Ishbia is doing for the Suns.
Saberestar wrote:Adelson ( Luka) and the Wolves owner ( Towns) traded their stars who were drafted for their own teams and stayed loyal to the franchise JUST TO SAVE MONEY primary probably can give you another point of view when analyzing what Ishbia is doing for the Suns.
MrMiyagi wrote:Watch LA trade LeBron for like Zion or some ****.
Calvin Klein wrote:Saberestar wrote:Adelson ( Luka) and the Wolves owner ( Towns) traded their stars who were drafted for their own teams and stayed loyal to the franchise JUST TO SAVE MONEY primary probably can give you another point of view when analyzing what Ishbia is doing for the Suns.
You cannot be serious with this![]()
Saberestar wrote:Calvin Klein wrote:Saberestar wrote:Adelson ( Luka) and the Wolves owner ( Towns) traded their stars who were drafted for their own teams and stayed loyal to the franchise JUST TO SAVE MONEY primary probably can give you another point of view when analyzing what Ishbia is doing for the Suns.
You cannot be serious with this![]()
Results aren't there but he is putting all (money and all resources) trying to build a great team.
Mavs and Wolves got to the Western Conference Finals and look at what their owners have done to their franchises JUST TO SAVE MONEY. I would hate that.
Calvin Klein wrote:besides, this is not even about saving money for Dallas. It cannot be. It's shady as ****. If they wanted to get rid of Luka for WHATEVER reason, they could have got a much better return but instead he goes to the Lakers, of course
The Mavs, who were $5.1 million over the luxury tax before acquiring Davis, are now $628,000 under the tax, according to Bobby Marks of ESPN.
Saberestar wrote:Calvin Klein wrote:besides, this is not even about saving money for Dallas. It cannot be. It's shady as ****. If they wanted to get rid of Luka for WHATEVER reason, they could have got a much better return but instead he goes to the Lakers, of courseThe Mavs, who were $5.1 million over the luxury tax before acquiring Davis, are now $628,000 under the tax, according to Bobby Marks of ESPN.
And they don't have to pay the supermax (biggest contract ever) to Doncic now.
Calvin Klein wrote:Saberestar wrote:Calvin Klein wrote:
You cannot be serious with this![]()
Results aren't there but he is putting all (money and all resources) trying to build a great team.
Mavs and Wolves got to the Western Conference Finals and look at what their owners have done to their franchises JUST TO SAVE MONEY. I would hate that.
Just because there are other **** owners doesn't mean Ishbia's doing a good job. Yes, he is spending money, so what? In the stupidest way possible.
I'm not impressed by some uber rich guy spending money, sorry. I would be impressed if he had put smart basketball personnel and let them do their job.
Celtics, Spurs, Heat...I don't even know who owns those teams. But I sure do know who the GM is. That's the type of example to follow.
Calvin Klein wrote:Saberestar wrote:Calvin Klein wrote:besides, this is not even about saving money for Dallas. It cannot be. It's shady as ****. If they wanted to get rid of Luka for WHATEVER reason, they could have got a much better return but instead he goes to the Lakers, of courseThe Mavs, who were $5.1 million over the luxury tax before acquiring Davis, are now $628,000 under the tax, according to Bobby Marks of ESPN.
And they don't have to pay the supermax (biggest contract ever) to Doncic now.
still doesn't explain why the Lakers. That's the shady part. Not whatever reason they have for getting rid of him.
BobbieL wrote:Calvin Klein wrote:Saberestar wrote:
And they don't have to pay the supermax (biggest contract ever) to Doncic now.
still doesn't explain why the Lakers. That's the shady part. Not whatever reason they have for getting rid of him.
There is no way the Mavs couldn't have gotten more for Luka than other teams
Yes, maybe for this year, AD will help them. But the Lakers didn't give up squat for Luka
As for the Suns - going to say it - if they are not blowing it up -- don't trade for Butler
is the Nurk for Rui thing real
also is hte Gogi for Allen thing real

mkot wrote:Ghost of Kleine wrote:
The man lost a LOT I mean A LOT of money. I wonder there's something we don't know about Luka's health or his approach to his conditioning. Resigning a generational talent entering his prime is a no-branier. WTF are they thinking?
Mavs trading Luka because he is fat before the Pels trading Zion is insane.

BurningHeart wrote:See the great thing about not paying much attention to the NBA anymore is that I have no idea who the **** losers like that guy are or who they're supposed to be.
KdoubleDees23 wrote:BobbieL wrote:Calvin Klein wrote:
still doesn't explain why the Lakers. That's the shady part. Not whatever reason they have for getting rid of him.
There is no way the Mavs couldn't have gotten more for Luka than other teams
Yes, maybe for this year, AD will help them. But the Lakers didn't give up squat for Luka
As for the Suns - going to say it - if they are not blowing it up -- don't trade for Butler
is the Nurk for Rui thing real
also is hte Gogi for Allen thing real
I second that Nurk for Rui. But then again do we want to give the Lakers a Center that can help fill a need.
bwgood77 wrote:mkot wrote:Ghost of Kleine wrote:
The man lost a LOT I mean A LOT of money. I wonder there's something we don't know about Luka's health or his approach to his conditioning. Resigning a generational talent entering his prime is a no-branier. WTF are they thinking?
Mavs trading Luka because he is fat before the Pels trading Zion is insane.
I don't think Sidery knows what he is talking about. He's just repeating what Shams and others said. It was obvious he was going to leave in FA or ask to be traded at some point.

Revived wrote:
Every single report so far says Luka never asked out, didn’t want out and that he was shocked by this.
Stop the f****ing idiotic crap of posting some dumbass trying to be a reporter on twitter. Seriously, if any of you actually follow that guy on twitter and post his stuff here, that actually speaks very poorly about you.