letsgosuns wrote:WeekapaugGroove wrote:letsgosuns wrote:I said this last night. I think Love will be signed and traded. There is no way I see Cleveland re-signing him AND Thompson. They both want max contracts. Even if Thompson gets a near max deal, you do not invest that kind of money in a starter and a bench player that play the same position. Plus four max contracts for Lebron, Irving, Love, and Thompson leaves no money for anything else.
I think he just leaves for nothing. With the new CBA you can't do a 5 year contract sign and trade so really the only way it's a s&t is if it's to a team without cap space.
But what if the Suns hypothetically trade the Morris brothers and Tucker for him? It benefits both teams. Suns get him while dumping those contracts and they still have a lot of cap space to get another big free agent. Cleveland lets him go and gets bench depth in return. Helps both teams.
It doesn't help Cleveland at all, since the only compelling reason they have to let Love go is to avoid slamming face first into a gigantic tax bill. Taking on 5.5 + 5 + 8 of Tucker and Morrises is very counterproductive to any hypothetical goals they have here when that's just 2 milli less than Love's ~20.
Sign and trade only used to net you a big return when you could sign and trade to teams over the cap, who couldn't afford to outright ink the guy in free agency (see: Nash to Lakers). This is no longer legal.
Cavs would be more inclined to take on something like Tucker + a couple of weak picks (a player they can use, plus a suppressed payroll and potential cheap rotation players/trade chips down the line when those picks convey), since if Love was dead set on going to Phoenix they aren't getting **** for him anyways.