Kerrsed wrote:
I guess there was a sniper in the building. One thing I'll say though, Jordan would never pull that sh*t.
Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez
Kerrsed wrote:
bigfoot wrote:Somehow the Spurs remain relevant. Probably the surprise team of the season.
sunsbg wrote:bigfoot wrote:Somehow the Spurs remain relevant. Probably the surprise team of the season.
Spurs winning is never a surprise. They play the right way for many years now under Popovich.
King4Day wrote:I can appreciate Draymond's concerns here but not sure I fully agree with them.
I think it's different because we know "it's a business" and many more players are traded at the teams desire as opposed to the player demanding a trade. The team is working with Drummond and Blake to make something work. If they can't then they buy said player out.
I think his gripe is how players are crucified if they demand a trade. In my opinion, the reason it's like this is because players like AD and Harden limited who they would accept a trade to. In that case, they deserve to receive flack for it. Especially if you had multiple years left like Harden did. You handcuff the team and force them to do damage control with the media.
What are peoples thoughts on this?
I think what gets lost in all these arguments is the fact the NBA is the employer and teams are just a division of that employer. Like in real life you can choose to abide by the rules of that employer or work someplace else. Plus all rules governing labor are collectively bargained by the players union.bwgood77 wrote:King4Day wrote:I can appreciate Draymond's concerns here but not sure I fully agree with them.
I think it's different because we know "it's a business" and many more players are traded at the teams desire as opposed to the player demanding a trade. The team is working with Drummond and Blake to make something work. If they can't then they buy said player out.
I think his gripe is how players are crucified if they demand a trade. In my opinion, the reason it's like this is because players like AD and Harden limited who they would accept a trade to. In that case, they deserve to receive flack for it. Especially if you had multiple years left like Harden did. You handcuff the team and force them to do damage control with the media.
What are peoples thoughts on this?
I can kind of understand it from the players point of view, but these things are written into contracts....if players don't want trades ask for no trade clause.
If you sign a contract to play for someone for a certain dollar amount and you haven't put a no trade clause in there, a team should be able to trade you...most players know and say they know it's part of the business.
That being said, I don't see a big problem asking for a trade as long as you remain professional and give it your all while there...a team doesn't have to oblige.
And if a team doesn't want to play a guy, that's their choice too..a lot of players don't play.
King4Day wrote:I can appreciate Draymond's concerns here but not sure I fully agree with them.
I think it's different because we know "it's a business" and many more players are traded at the teams desire as opposed to the player demanding a trade. The team is working with Drummond and Blake to make something work. If they can't then they buy said player out.
I think his gripe is how players are crucified if they demand a trade. In my opinion, the reason it's like this is because players like AD and Harden limited who they would accept a trade to. In that case, they deserve to receive flack for it. Especially if you had multiple years left like Harden did. You handcuff the team and force them to do damage control with the media.
What are peoples thoughts on this?