ATTL wrote:Not a good look for Jackson, for sure. Do we know of any other incidents like this that could show a pattern?
Nothing that I've ever seen. I don't think Bill Self would like him so much if he did, he can be a hard ass.
Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez
ATTL wrote:Not a good look for Jackson, for sure. Do we know of any other incidents like this that could show a pattern?

darealjuice wrote:ATTL wrote:Not a good look for Jackson, for sure. Do we know of any other incidents like this that could show a pattern?
Nothing that I've ever seen. I don't think Bill Self would like him so much if he did, he can be a hard ass.
ATTL wrote:darealjuice wrote:ATTL wrote:Not a good look for Jackson, for sure. Do we know of any other incidents like this that could show a pattern?
Nothing that I've ever seen. I don't think Bill Self would like him so much if he did, he can be a hard ass.
I'll trust our front office's judgment on JJ. If Jackson is really an ****, giving millions of dollars will make him worse. I hope he doesn't do **** like this anymore even if we don't draft him.
For tomorrow's games:
FSU and Isaac play at 10am
NC state and smith play at 10 on ESPN
Kentucky plays Florida at noon on CBS
Duke at Miami at 2 on CBS
Kansas @ texus at 4 on ESPN
UCLA @ Arizona at 6:15 on ESPN
Who else will be watching 10 hours of basketball tomorrow?

Damkac wrote:Would Tatum fit with the Suns? Another iso scorer is not what this team needs the most. Suns already have very similar player in Warren.
Damkac wrote:Would Tatum fit with the Suns? Another iso scorer is not what this team needs the most. Suns already have very similar player in Warren.
What do you think the suns need most?
darealjuice wrote:Damkac wrote:Would Tatum fit with the Suns? Another iso scorer is not what this team needs the most. Suns already have very similar player in Warren.
I think Tatum would be a pretty good fit for us, although I prefer Jackson's fit if we go the SF route. He's a good passer, although not quite as good as Jackson, and he projects to be able to stretch the floor out better than Warren does while still having a nice mid-range game. His catch-and-shoot ability would really benefit us at SF to open the court up because right now teams can sag further into help when TJ is out there due to him not being the most willing 3-point shooter. I've also been impressed with his defense this year, he's done a lot better than I expected him to going into the year.


darealjuice wrote:jredsaz wrote:DirtyDez wrote:
He sprained his ankle early on. Went to the locker room then can back out.
I know. I saw it. The other thing to consider is the offense he plays in. Its a motion offense with exceptional ball movement. I saw a stat where they have the highest team fg% in the NCAA since 91-92 Duke. He has an amazing court sense. Consistently made the right pass. Super smart player.
BUT I have played a lot of ball and I have watched more. He was defended by athletes tonight that could not get on the court in a D-League game. He struggled the two times I saw him try to drive in a half court set. It reflected the criticism on his DX video. Maybe it was the injury, maybe not. Just reporting live from Mill Ave. Lol
That's part of what is scaring me a bit with Lonzo as high as he's being talked about in the draft. He has a lot of good shooters around him that definitely help his assist numbers out by hitting shots within the offense, we've rarely seen him run a pick and roll in college despite it being the one of the most important parts of modern NBA basketball, and he hasn't shown the same ability to create his own offense that the other point guards at the top of the draft have (% assisted at rim / % of 3s assisted; Ball: 54.7%/75%, Smith Jr: 20.4%/49%, Fultz: 17.4%/55.8%, Fox: 21%/77.8%). I mean he's only made 8 mid-range shots all year on 42% while Fultz has made 88 on 43.8%.
His basketball IQ is probably the highest in the draft, he's shot really efficiently in college, he facilitates the UCLA offense extremely well, and he's a very, very good passer, but something about the low frequency of breaking his man down off the dribble and creating offense for himself as a point guard worries me when he gets to the NBA level.
ATTL wrote:I don't think Tatum is selfish, he gets frozen out by the older kids a lot while they play hero ball. This duke game is awful so far. 20 points in 23 minutes.
oddity wrote:darealjuice wrote:jredsaz wrote:
I know. I saw it. The other thing to consider is the offense he plays in. Its a motion offense with exceptional ball movement. I saw a stat where they have the highest team fg% in the NCAA since 91-92 Duke. He has an amazing court sense. Consistently made the right pass. Super smart player.
BUT I have played a lot of ball and I have watched more. He was defended by athletes tonight that could not get on the court in a D-League game. He struggled the two times I saw him try to drive in a half court set. It reflected the criticism on his DX video. Maybe it was the injury, maybe not. Just reporting live from Mill Ave. Lol
That's part of what is scaring me a bit with Lonzo as high as he's being talked about in the draft. He has a lot of good shooters around him that definitely help his assist numbers out by hitting shots within the offense, we've rarely seen him run a pick and roll in college despite it being the one of the most important parts of modern NBA basketball, and he hasn't shown the same ability to create his own offense that the other point guards at the top of the draft have (% assisted at rim / % of 3s assisted; Ball: 54.7%/75%, Smith Jr: 20.4%/49%, Fultz: 17.4%/55.8%, Fox: 21%/77.8%). I mean he's only made 8 mid-range shots all year on 42% while Fultz has made 88 on 43.8%.
His basketball IQ is probably the highest in the draft, he's shot really efficiently in college, he facilitates the UCLA offense extremely well, and he's a very, very good passer, but something about the low frequency of breaking his man down off the dribble and creating offense for himself as a point guard worries me when he gets to the NBA level.
Great post, and it backs up what I've been thinking about Ball for the last few months. Lonzo is an exceptional passer and rebounder, but he is seriously missing a mid range game. In today's world of advanced analytics it seems like the mid range is seen as some taboo area that low IQ players take shots from, but every single major scorer in the NBA must have at least a basic pull-up jumper. Lonzo lacks even that, with a trifecta of slow movement speed for a 1, lack of footwork/quickness to stop and pop, and funky shooting fundaments. He will rarely take mid-range jumpers, and when he does it looks like this:
![]()
![]()
![]()
This creates a huge hole for Lonzo; a massive area of the court that he simply cannot score from. The bright side for Lonzo is that he's shown flashes of a decent floater, which can be a huge asset for scoring in close-mid range, especially with his height and length working for him. Still, we see the night and day difference between the mid-range shooting of Lonzo and a guy like Fultz, and it draws a very clear line between a pass-first pg and a true scorer. I like Lonzo a lot, but this (especiallyespeciallyespecially combined with his lateral quickness on D) shows just how much of a boom-or-bust he can be, despite the universal acclaim heard elsewhere.
