Puff wrote:bwgood77 wrote:sunsbg wrote:Ayton had better offensive numbers playing with Rubio. The notion he's a by product of CP3 is laughable and maclearly shows the agenda of a few people here. KAT is a better offensive player obviously and still has not done squat while being two more years in the league and playing with multiple Nr 1 picks and a player like Butler. His shooting is not that valuable on this team, Ayton's D is certainly huge.
It's funny, being that Puff was going by stuff like PPG, etc, and also saying CP3 was the reason, Ayton put up more PPG before CP3 when Rubio was here and he was a focal point of scoring. His efficiency has improved now though.
I'd be happy to have KAT.
But Ayton is probably more important to our team than many think.
People assume all those back him want to give him the max. I don't think he is quite worth it. Though Book wasn't either. They will need to come up with a good deal for him or match one then. I think they should try to avoid matching one so he doesn't have some sort of out in 3 years though. You may have to give him a good deal just to lock him up for 5 years.
If other teams think he's worth the max, then he will have trade value anyway, and it will be far higher if he's locked up for 5 years than if he has an out after 3.
With a rising cap, more money wouldn't be a big deal. I think if he won't take like 5/$135 they should just offer him what Booker got. I think if they phrase it right "We will give you exactly what we gave Book" it should make him feel valued, even in relative terms it's not nearly as much money when you consider increase in cap or ''nba inflation" and is a lot less relatively speaking than Booker got when he got it.
The point I am trying to make is that what Ayton brings does not deserve the max. For that matter I do not think any of the bigs in the league are worth the max that includes Embiid.
I agree that Ayton isn't worth the max. I never said he was. Though I don't think anyone on our team is. But I also wouldn't let Ayton walk for nothing or trade him for nickels on the dollar. If I knew multiple teams would pay him the max and I thought he was a solid piece I'd pay him and trade him later. You keep using the "use max money elsewhere" but you can't let him walk and gain back cap space...you just reduce the amount you are over the cap when in a position like us.
About your list of players...every NBA champion typically has a top 5 or 10 player or maybe two.
Duncan was for all intents and purposes, a C. He just didn't want to be called a C because he would have never started an all star game or been 1st team all NBA because Shaq was in the west.
The best players come in all different packages and pigeoholing them into a position is weird. What is Giannis really? A big? A wing? A PF?
But regardless, we are not winning a championship unless we have a few top tier players since we don't have some mega star. Players with clear roles.
But it would be nice if they all would take less than the max.


















