ImageImageImage

Offseason Trade and Free Agency Discussion

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez

User avatar
Qwigglez
Forum Mod - Suns
Forum Mod - Suns
Posts: 21,553
And1: 14,846
Joined: Jul 10, 2009
Contact:
     

Re: Offseason Trade and Free Agency Discussion 

Post#921 » by Qwigglez » Tue Jun 30, 2015 10:34 am

SunsFanSSOL wrote:Don't know where this guy is getting his info from, but...

[tweet]https://twitter.com/InsiderSuns/status/615743581987323904[/tweet]

[tweet]https://twitter.com/InsiderSuns/status/615743944861683712[/tweet]


Definitely need more SFs!
Let's see here...
Carroll... Tucker... Marcus... Granger... Warren.

Don't worry Warren you're fifth man up!
TrillTowers
Banned User
Posts: 22
And1: 5
Joined: Jun 25, 2015

Re: Offseason Trade and Free Agency Discussion 

Post#922 » by TrillTowers » Tue Jun 30, 2015 10:40 am

Carroll is pretty much a copy of Tucker.
User avatar
thamadkant
Suns Forum Picker of Cherries
Posts: 16,916
And1: 8,599
Joined: Jan 06, 2007
 

Re: Offseason Trade and Free Agency Discussion 

Post#923 » by thamadkant » Tue Jun 30, 2015 10:46 am

TrillTowers wrote:
1UPZ wrote:
SF88 wrote:Can you reveal the other site?



Here, by a poster


Complete BS, you can't get a 5th year in sign and trades anymore. If Love was willing to come here and if we want him we would just sign him for free and not give up substantial value to sign him.
We would trade Tucker for nothing and just add Love to Bledsoe, Knight, Warren and Len.



Love can certainly get his 5th year and still be traded.
It wont be until December though.

The confusion is whether its a sign and trade... or Cavs ahem Lebron... "back-stabs" Love and trade him for Bledsoe and filler.
User avatar
thamadkant
Suns Forum Picker of Cherries
Posts: 16,916
And1: 8,599
Joined: Jan 06, 2007
 

Re: Offseason Trade and Free Agency Discussion 

Post#924 » by thamadkant » Tue Jun 30, 2015 10:48 am

TrillTowers wrote:Carroll is pretty much a copy of Tucker.



Caroll is a better "3D" player, Tucker is a bit slower on his 3pt shooting, Caroll is basically a better shooter IMO.
User avatar
thamadkant
Suns Forum Picker of Cherries
Posts: 16,916
And1: 8,599
Joined: Jan 06, 2007
 

Re: Offseason Trade and Free Agency Discussion 

Post#925 » by thamadkant » Tue Jun 30, 2015 10:50 am

SunsFanSSOL wrote:
1UPZ wrote:
SF88 wrote:Can you reveal the other site?



Here, by a poster


Is "EarlBlackJesusMonroe" reputable? Someone in the comments implicated that he has previously spoke about his "sources."



Not sure, but most of his posts arent "trollish" if you know what I mean. As in they seem reasonable.
TrillTowers
Banned User
Posts: 22
And1: 5
Joined: Jun 25, 2015

Re: Offseason Trade and Free Agency Discussion 

Post#926 » by TrillTowers » Tue Jun 30, 2015 10:55 am

1UPZ wrote:

Love can certainly get his 5th year and still be traded.
It wont be until December though.

The confusion is whether its a sign and trade... or Cavs ahem Lebron... "back-stabs" Love and trade him for Bledsoe and filler.


That is utter none-sense.
User avatar
Djedefre
Senior
Posts: 729
And1: 939
Joined: May 31, 2014
 

Re: Offseason Trade and Free Agency Discussion 

Post#927 » by Djedefre » Tue Jun 30, 2015 10:55 am

TrillTowers wrote:Carroll is pretty much a copy of Tucker.


Transition. DeMarre is more suitable for fast paced bball.
User avatar
thamadkant
Suns Forum Picker of Cherries
Posts: 16,916
And1: 8,599
Joined: Jan 06, 2007
 

Re: Offseason Trade and Free Agency Discussion 

Post#928 » by thamadkant » Tue Jun 30, 2015 11:14 am

TrillTowers wrote:
1UPZ wrote:

Love can certainly get his 5th year and still be traded.
It wont be until December though.

The confusion is whether its a sign and trade... or Cavs ahem Lebron... "back-stabs" Love and trade him for Bledsoe and filler.


That is utter none-sense.


1. players signed from FA can be traded 6 months after signing. Love can sign a 5 year contract with Cavs. Isn't that the rules?

2. Cavs can trade Love to any team they want to after that 6 months. It's legal but a frowned upon if they give Love the impression he is part of their future. And I'm assuming Love doesn't have a no-trade clause.

3. I already said, the confusion could be the "sign and trade" scenario. Which only allows 4 years max for Love in this situation.



It's not complicated, and makes sense to me.
TrillTowers
Banned User
Posts: 22
And1: 5
Joined: Jun 25, 2015

Re: Offseason Trade and Free Agency Discussion 

Post#929 » by TrillTowers » Tue Jun 30, 2015 11:16 am

Ok it makes sense to you, unfortunately you are living in a dream world then.

The scenario that the Cavs sign Love to 5 years with an under the table agreement with the Suns to trade for him 6 months later is utter none-sense.

That will never happen and is possibly the biggest none-sense I ever read on realgm and that says a lot.

Not to mention that why would Kevin Love want a 5 year deal? He will probably look at a short term deal to sign a new max once the cap exploded and not tie himself to what he can sign for now for 5 years.

And next the health of Love next season is in question. He will probably not be fully fit until late in the season. Basically you would be signing Love to a 2 year deal that you know he will miss about 50% and your team is not good enough to make the playoffs without him.

Love is not coming to Phoenix unless outright signed.
Frank Lee
RealGM
Posts: 14,268
And1: 10,086
Joined: Nov 07, 2006

Re: Offseason Trade and Free Agency Discussion 

Post#930 » by Frank Lee » Tue Jun 30, 2015 11:22 am

You need to clean house before you decorate
What ? Me Worry ?
User avatar
thamadkant
Suns Forum Picker of Cherries
Posts: 16,916
And1: 8,599
Joined: Jan 06, 2007
 

Re: Offseason Trade and Free Agency Discussion 

Post#931 » by thamadkant » Tue Jun 30, 2015 11:29 am

TrillTowers wrote:Ok it makes sense to you, unfortunately you are living in a dream world then.

The scenario that the Cavs sign Love to 5 years with an under the table agreement with the Suns to trade for him 6 months later is utter none-sense.

That will never happen and is possibly the biggest none-sense I ever read on realgm and that says a lot.

Not to mention that why would Kevin Love want a 5 year deal? He will probably look at a short term deal to sign a new max once the cap exploded and not tie himself to what he can sign for now for 5 years.

And next the health of Love next season is in question. He will probably not be fully fit until late in the season. Basically you would be signing Love to a 2 year deal that you know he will miss about 50% and your team is not good enough to make the playoffs without him.

Love is not coming to Phoenix unless outright signed.




Look, what I said are factually and legally possible. Regarding the contracts and trades etc.

Yes it's UNLIKELY Love will be traded to the Suns. But nothing wrong to speculate as a fan.

You're speculating too... You see, everyone does it. It's normal in fan forums.
TrillTowers
Banned User
Posts: 22
And1: 5
Joined: Jun 25, 2015

Re: Offseason Trade and Free Agency Discussion 

Post#932 » by TrillTowers » Tue Jun 30, 2015 11:32 am

I am not speculating. And no it is not unlikely, it simply comepletely unrealistic none-sense.

It is not worth discussing, at all.

Not to mention it is not legally possible under the CBA at all. Making a verbal agreement is still not legal, just hard to prove. Anyway it is complete bogus.
Saberestar
RealGM
Posts: 22,367
And1: 17,002
Joined: May 21, 2010

Re: Offseason Trade and Free Agency Discussion 

Post#933 » by Saberestar » Tue Jun 30, 2015 11:54 am

Paul Coro writes here about Carroll. He says that he is probably our first target after Love/Aldridge.

http://www.azcentral.com/story/sports/nba/suns/2015/06/29/phoenix-suns-kevin-love-lamarcus-aldridge-demarre-carroll-hornacek-nba/29489891/
User avatar
King4Day
RealGM
Posts: 13,614
And1: 9,822
Joined: Dec 11, 2010
Location: Pandora
         

Re: Offseason Trade and Free Agency Discussion 

Post#934 » by King4Day » Tue Jun 30, 2015 12:18 pm

SunsFanSSOL wrote:
1UPZ wrote:
SF88 wrote:Can you reveal the other site?



Here, by a poster


Is "EarlBlackJesusMonroe" reputable? Someone in the comments implicated that he has previously spoke about his "sources."


I'm pretty sure you can no longer sign and trade a player for the full 5 years anymore. If I'm right then I'd say he's def not reputable. Also the 'sauces' comment makes me think it's a joke too
"Sometimes, the dragon wins" #RallyTheValley
JJ13
Rookie
Posts: 1,158
And1: 490
Joined: Jul 18, 2005

Re: Offseason Trade and Free Agency Discussion 

Post#935 » by JJ13 » Tue Jun 30, 2015 12:21 pm

TrillTowers wrote:I am not speculating. And no it is not unlikely, it simply comepletely unrealistic none-sense.

It is not worth discussing, at all.

Not to mention it is not legally possible under the CBA at all. Making a verbal agreement is still not legal, just hard to prove. Anyway it is complete bogus.


That's none-sense

...sorry just wanted to try out your butchered version on nonsense. Seems to be your favorite non-word...or none-word?
JMac1
Suns Forum Training Specialist
Posts: 10,032
And1: 4,004
Joined: May 23, 2009

Re: Offseason Trade and Free Agency Discussion 

Post#936 » by JMac1 » Tue Jun 30, 2015 12:48 pm

TrillTowers wrote:I can't believe people are believing any of the Bledsoe stuff.

None of it comes out of Phoenix.

Why would we want to make Knight our PG after how poorly he played in the few games after the trade? We traded for him to be our SG. People need to let go of that "2 PG lineup". We would play the same style wether our SG is B.Knight or Alec Burks and it is not like shooting guards punish anyone in the post anymore.

All the Bledsoe rumors are started by outsiders who are ignorant and try to sell their assumptions as actual information. Sadly this is how 90% of the American sports media works.

Also why would we sign and trade for Love? Love is an UFA and in a sign and trade you can't get a 5th year anymore. There is no reason to do a sign and trade at all, neither for Love nor for the Suns. In the unlikely event that Love leaves Cleveland and wants to come to Phoenix we would just sign him.

Talk about Millsap being a better bargain is none-sense. Millsap will likely get max type money himself.

The Suns need to look at Thaddeus Young and Kostas Koufos. Those two are more realistic targets and would improve the team a lot.
JMac1
Suns Forum Training Specialist
Posts: 10,032
And1: 4,004
Joined: May 23, 2009

Re: Offseason Trade and Free Agency Discussion 

Post#937 » by JMac1 » Tue Jun 30, 2015 12:54 pm

BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 15,353
And1: 8,997
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: Offseason Trade and Free Agency Discussion 

Post#938 » by BobbieL » Tue Jun 30, 2015 1:18 pm

SunsFanSSOL wrote:Don't know where this guy is getting his info from, but...

[tweet]https://twitter.com/InsiderSuns/status/615743581987323904[/tweet]

[tweet]https://twitter.com/InsiderSuns/status/615743944861683712[/tweet]



These two tweets actually make a boat load of sense. Millsaps and Carroll are more reasonable targets and I think would be good fits to the team.

Of course, the idea of Aldridge or Love is tops - but if you can get Milsaps and CArroll, that is helping your team

Also, shipping out the Morris twins

Back to the Bledsoe to the Cavs. If the Cavs truly wantedthat, and of course Love wanted Phoenix - the ultimate for Phoenix would be:

Out: Bledsoe, Morris, Morris and Tucker - 31m

In: Love,Mike Mille and Haywood - 30-32 m; immediately waive Haywood. SAving 10m

Now 22m under the cap with Love on board. Still can go get Carroll, a good PG, and resign Wright.
BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 15,353
And1: 8,997
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: Offseason Trade and Free Agency Discussion 

Post#939 » by BobbieL » Tue Jun 30, 2015 1:19 pm

Qwigglez wrote:
SunsFanSSOL wrote:Don't know where this guy is getting his info from, but...

[tweet]https://twitter.com/InsiderSuns/status/615743581987323904[/tweet]

[tweet]https://twitter.com/InsiderSuns/status/615743944861683712[/tweet]


Definitely need more SFs!
Let's see here...
Carroll... Tucker... Marcus... Granger... Warren.

Don't worry Warren you're fifth man up!


Pretty sure Tucker and the Morris twins are trade bait
User avatar
TASTIC
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,418
And1: 2,428
Joined: May 17, 2004
Location: New Zealand
   

Re: Offseason Trade and Free Agency Discussion 

Post#940 » by TASTIC » Tue Jun 30, 2015 1:22 pm

I'd look at Marco Belinelli as well - 6'5", 29yr old and Spurs might not be able to keep him if Green wants $9m+.

Far as I can see, if we trade Bledsoe it doesn't look like it'll be for a SG which leaves a hole that despite his size, Tucker can't fill.

Offer him something like $15m over 2yrs, as well as a starting gig and he might bite. He's underrated defensively as well as athletically and he can knock down open shots really consistently (last five seasons 1.5 threes per game at 39%).

Also he's been on some very good teams - veteran teams - Hornets, Bulls, Spurs.

Basically a good, veteran influence to have around while allowing youngsters to come through behind him...

Return to Phoenix Suns