suns91fan wrote:dgwdum wrote:JJ13 wrote:
Wolves got Wiggins, Thad and Bennett for Love (max)...so why would Wiggins for Bledsoe mean Bledsoe is max?
The point I was trying to make is that wiggins was good enough to get love and we know bledsoe is nowhere near as good as love. So if someone is only willing to trade bledsoe for wiggins than why not just give bledsoe the max since that particular poster values him so much.
Bledsoe is nowhere near as good as Love? That's highly debatable. Bledsoe is a two-way player, Love is not. I'll leave it at that.
Maybe it's a debate if you put it in those terms. In actuality, D is the only thing Bledsoe has over Love. Love is better at everything else