Page 1 of 2
Lou Still Not Signed
Posted: Thu Sep 9, 2010 9:57 pm
by WTFsunsFTW
OMG just offer him the LLE and lets have 15 players on the roster. We are still under the tax and will have the deepest team in the league.
http://basketball.realgm.com/src_wireta ... _amundson/
Re: Lou Still Not Signed
Posted: Thu Sep 9, 2010 9:58 pm
by KopLegend
Lou wants more than the LLE and promised minutes i think. That's why he's not signed yet.
Re: Lou Still Not Signed
Posted: Thu Sep 9, 2010 10:02 pm
by Miklo
He won't take the LLE unless he's truly desperate, or wants to wait a year and see if he can get more value in a weaker free agent class.
He's better than some players who have been signed this offseason which means only one thing; he's asking for too much money. Sadly for players like him, hustle and heart rarely adds millions to the salary. I still think he's worth more than what he could get here but he needs to concede a little bit.
Re: Lou Still Not Signed
Posted: Thu Sep 9, 2010 10:07 pm
by MaryvalesFinest
Louuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
Looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooou
Loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooouuuuuuuuuuu!!!
Re-Sign Lou!
Re: Lou Still Not Signed
Posted: Thu Sep 9, 2010 10:26 pm
by lilfishi22
Agreed.
Re: Lou Still Not Signed
Posted: Thu Sep 9, 2010 11:59 pm
by sunsfan3
wow r u kidding me.. PLEASE sign him already! hes a true defensive powerforward and we need that! hel do a better job on that end than hedo will!
Re: Lou Still Not Signed
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 12:33 am
by DRK
Not sure if I want Lou back. I really do love Lou, but I would rather have Lawal play than Lou.
Re: Lou Still Not Signed
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 6:23 am
by Juicy Juice
Da_Reel_Kboy wrote:Not sure if I want Lou back. I really do love Lou, but I would rather have Lawal play than Lou.
This (Kinda). I really want Lou, but I want to see what Lawal is made of.
Re: Lou Still Not Signed
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 7:35 am
by RunDogGun
Da_Reel_Kboy wrote:Not sure if I want Lou back. I really do love Lou, but I would rather have Lawal play than Lou.
I've liked Lou's play for years before we got him, so it is tough to see him go. I say sign him. Let the rookies learn in the D-League while Lou forces Warrick to step up his game to stay on the floor. Then at mid season, if the rookies prove themselves in practice, use Lou as an extra trading piece.
If Lou was just a better shooter, I would have much rather had him than Warrick at half the cost.
Re: Lou Still Not Signed
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 8:03 am
by MrVince
C'mon Louuuu, resign with us
Re: Lou Still Not Signed
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 8:24 am
by Mr. Sun
I rather have Lou then Warrick.
Re: Lou Still Not Signed
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 8:42 am
by LV-Suns
Mr. Sun wrote:I rather have Lou then Warrick.
Re: Lou Still Not Signed
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:34 pm
by Risensun
Resign Lou. At least that gives us the option of trading Warrick at the deadline. FO seriously dropping the ball here. Resigning Lou is a no brainer.
Re: Lou Still Not Signed
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 11:36 pm
by SUN
Amundson is awesome, and we need rebounding on our roster. It's a win-win, but we've got Gani now, who's younger and I'm guessing is better offensively? He's also a good rebounder, so... Do we really NEED Lou?
Re: Lou Still Not Signed
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 12:37 am
by rsavaj
LV-Suns wrote:Mr. Sun wrote:I rather have Lou then Warrick.
Re: Lou Still Not Signed
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 7:38 am
by LV-Suns
Re: Lou Still Not Signed
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 7:28 pm
by Little Digger
Lou's coming to the Bay.
Re: Lou Still Not Signed
Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 5:30 am
by Mr. Sun
rsavaj wrote:LV-Suns wrote:Mr. Sun wrote:I rather have Lou then Warrick.
I do hope Warrick forces me to eat those words
Re: Lou Still Not Signed
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 6:22 am
by DRK
I think Warrick will surprise us all this year.
Re: Lou Still Not Signed
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 8:53 am
by lilfishi22
We'll need surprises from everyone if we want to go deep in the playoffs again.