Page 1 of 1

Don't you love hypotheticals?

Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 8:52 pm
by Scubetrolis
Say the 2009-10 suns beat the lakers. Ron artest never put back in that offensive rebound, ect ect.

Do you think we would have beaten Boston? I'm just curious on your opinions. I think last years team was one of the best on franchise history.

Re: Don't you love hypotheticals?

Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 9:01 pm
by Nando88
dude don't get "start a new thread" happy please

Re: Don't you love hypotheticals?

Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 9:16 pm
by sunsbum
Who the frig are you to tell someone how to post on an open forum. I have a hunch that if kerrsed would have started the same threads you fanbois would be all for it.

Re: Don't you love hypotheticals?

Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 9:29 pm
by Dalerax
Did someone say Kerrsed??

:bowdown: :bowdown: :bowdown:

Wait, what are we talking about?

Re: Don't you love hypotheticals?

Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 9:33 pm
by Scubetrolis
Oh my bad, is this topic also being discussed in the "offseason thread" ;)

Re: Don't you love hypotheticals?

Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 9:39 pm
by sunsbum
Dalerax wrote:Did someone say Kerrsed??

:bowdown: :bowdown: :bowdown:

Wait, what are we talking about?

:o :lol:

Re: Don't you love hypotheticals?

Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 10:54 pm
by YFZblu
Would have had home court--Just saying.

Re: Don't you love hypotheticals?

Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 11:32 pm
by Kerrsed
I AM A GREATER WARRIOR!
Image

Re: Don't you love hypotheticals?

Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 11:36 pm
by Stix
Suns in 6

Re: Don't you love hypotheticals?

Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 11:46 pm
by JohnVancouver
I don;t say we would have beaten them but that tema was so in tune, we could have - it would have given them a terrible couple of weeks at the worst, and ruined their whole year quite possibly.

Re: Don't you love hypotheticals?

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2011 1:42 am
by sunskerr
I honestly don't think we'd beat them. But hey if you make the finals, you have a pretty good reason to be there in the first place.

Re: Don't you love hypotheticals?

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2011 1:58 am
by BurningHeart
It would have been close. Perkins would have probably played Amare very well though.

Re: Don't you love hypotheticals?

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2011 2:03 am
by RunDogGun
Scubetrolis wrote:Oh my bad, is this topic also being discussed in the "offseason thread" ;)


Kind of went the other direction with my suggestion, huh? And no, I don't love hypotheticals. :D

I took a great dump yesterday after thinking about the Suns vs the Lakers,maybe I should make thread about that? :roll: Well hypothetically speaking of course. :wink:

Re: Don't you love hypotheticals?

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2011 5:41 pm
by Scubetrolis
instead of making a new thread (your welcome thread haters lol ;) )

something that i think is never talked about..

when Amare came on the court when Horry hockey-checked Nash, he got suspended for the next game, fine that the rules.

what bothers me, and it was briefly brought up by Wilbon on PTI, was the following year, Garnett and 1 other did the exact same thing that Amare did, he did not get suspended. they went on to win the finals.

Wilbon even said on PTI the next day, "If im a suns fan, im super upset"

anyone remember this...yes im sulking, as the suns will not be contenders for probably several years so i live in the past lol :(

Re: Don't you love hypotheticals?

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2011 5:43 pm
by Scubetrolis
Kerssed....Scubetrolis is the greatest warrior of all time, he can throw a spear accurately at 75 yards, obviously the ultimate warrior has no shot...i mean Scubetrolis beat the sand god and had an epic battle with Prince ZZ. so come on, lets get serious

Re: Don't you love hypotheticals?

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2011 7:35 pm
by Nando88
:-?