RealGM

Hey Suns fans – friendly Bucks question –

Would this trade be of interest?

Suns give = Lopez, Frye, Warrick, 2012 1st lotto-protected

Suns get =
Ersan = 6’10 PF age24
Gooden = 6’10 PF age29
Livingston = 6’7 PG age26
Sanders = 6’11 C age22
2nd

thanks

no thanks

i like this idea better:

suns give:
Lopez, Warrick, Pietrus

suns get:
Sanders, 2nd



Not only would we rid ourselves of that extra wing player, but we'd pick up a big man who has proved, statistically speaking, that he can perform, given the proper minutes. Also, we would get a draft pick. That's always good.

Nash-Brooks
Carter-Dudley
Hill-Childress
Frye-Morris
Gortat-Sanders

sunsfan3 wrote:i like this idea better:

suns give:
Lopez, Warrick, Pietrus

suns get:
Sanders, 2nd



Not only would we rid ourselves of that extra wing player, but we'd pick up a big man who has proved, statistically speaking, that he can perform, given the proper minutes. Also, we would get a draft pick. That's always good.

Nash-Brooks
Carter-Dudley
Hill-Childress
Frye-Morris
Gortat-Sanders

Are you serious? Sanders is worse than Lopez and they are the same age.

2010-2011 stats:

Lopez 6.4 pts, 3.2 reb, 0.7 blk, .501 FG%, .740 FT% in 14.8 mpg
Sanders 4.3 pts, 3.0 reb, 1.2 blk, .433 FG%, .560 FT% in 14.5 mpg

Terrible trade!

I would like to have Chris-Douglas Roberts on our team. Not sure but I think they didn't make him a RFA?

oh before we say no thanks we realy need to think of it - there will be some real talent coming to phx in this one - and we are "only" losing frye ( which sucks ) but could start ilyasova or morris. + we get rid of warrick and get rid of the greatest bust-lopez ever...

GrantHill wrote:I would like to have Chris-Douglas Roberts on our team. Not sure but I think they didn't make him a RFA?

+1

pidi wrote:oh before we say no thanks we realy need to think of it - there will be some real talent coming to phx in this one - and we are "only" losing frye ( which sucks ) but could start ilyasova or morris. + we get rid of warrick and get rid of the greatest bust-lopez ever...

Hell no to Gooden and his terrible contract.

GrantHill wrote:

pidi wrote:oh before we say no thanks we realy need to think of it - there will be some real talent coming to phx in this one - and we are "only" losing frye ( which sucks ) but could start ilyasova or morris. + we get rid of warrick and get rid of the greatest bust-lopez ever...

Hell no to Gooden and his terrible contract.

yah he is realy on a terrible contract, gotta agree.. this may be the death track to this trade..

We unload Hakeem but take back Gooden at 2.5 mil more per year and for 2 extra years - doesn't make sense for us. Ilysasova is a nice young talent, Sanders is maybe a good one but neither adresses our real needs. The Bucks players that do are in play as free agents, whenever that begins - Redd, Mba Moute, CDR

Michael Redd hasn't addressed a need in 6 years. WTF are you smoking?

WTFsunsFTW wrote:Michael Redd hasn't addressed a need in 6 years. WTF are you smoking?

it's been suggested we bring him in on a cheap, short contract - which is about all we can afford. The idea is that he'd be agreeable because of the training staff here, who would likely be about the best help he could get at getting his legs working right again.

so allow me to learn-

you guys like Frye > Lopez?

frye & gooden's contract is almost the same & you would not sawp them to also ditch warrick?

gooden, ersan for frye & warrick

eagle13 wrote:so allow me to learn-

you guys like Frye > Lopez?

frye & gooden's contract is almost the same & you would not sawp them to also ditch warrick?

gooden, ersan for frye & warrick

Frye is good value for us given how he fits into our offensive scheme and now that he's broadened his game, he doesn't completely disappear when the shot isn't falling. Gooden is superfluous now - if we were going to trade Frye we would be doing it in a deal that brought back more that Ersan and a bad contract for a guy we don't need.
Warrick can be useful, he's just a disappointment - unloading him isn't worth adding Gooden.

Frye goes nowhere. Same goes for Dudley, Hill, Nash, and Gortat.

Anybody else not mentioned you can have. But those 5 players have pretty much established themselves as Phoenix Suns players that will be kept no matter the asking price (well, except if u give Kobe, Durant, Wade, or LeBron of course lol).

gaspar wrote:Are you serious? Sanders is worse than Lopez and they are the same age.

2010-2011 stats:

Lopez 6.4 pts, 3.2 reb, 0.7 blk, .501 FG%, .740 FT% in 14.8 mpg
Sanders 4.3 pts, 3.0 reb, 1.2 blk, .433 FG%, .560 FT% in 14.5 mpg

Terrible trade!

THANK YOU!

I am so sick of people wanting to trade for Sanders, the guy is terribad. People act like Lopez is this supreme bust, than start drooling over a guy who is worse than him.

Makes no sense whatsoever (and don't give me that potential crap, we have seen Lopez's potential, no one knows if Sanders even has a shred of the potential that Lopez has/had)

would you swap Lopez for Ersan?

Is Grant Hill's time likely up in Phoenix?
Bucks have a real logjam at PF if Mbah a Moute resigns, I would do Gooden for Childress or Warrick.
Bucks need to deal a 4 for a 3 and imo the Suns a 3 for a 4

More Bang For The Bucks wrote:Is Grant Hill's time likely up in Phoenix?
Bucks have a real logjam at PF if Mbah a Moute resigns, I would do Gooden for Childress or Warrick.
Bucks need to deal a 4 for a 3 and imo the Suns a 3 for a 4

Gooden, the best rebounding PF the Bucks have, only boarded 6.8 a game. We get that out of Frye. I don't see the point really. Plus we just drafted a PF, making (if Frye still starts there) Frye, Warrick, Lawal, Morris, and Collins(overseas). However, Childress is only one of four wings IF we still can resign Hill.

Assuming Hill leaves(which I think he will),how would you feel about a Warrick, Pietrus, & Lopez for Marvin deal?