Page 1 of 75

Official Offseason Thread 4.0

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 2:07 pm
by Miklo

Re: Official Offseason Thread 4.0

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 2:28 pm
by Biscotti
N.O.R.E. posted this on the trade board. I thought it was well thought out. Thoughts?


MEM / PHO / GS - Well thought out blockbuster

Postby N.O.R.E. on Fri Jul 29, 2011 3:05 am
Grizz Trade: Gay, Mayo
Receive: Monta, Pietrus, Amundson, TE (created)

M.Gasol/Haddadi/Amundson
Randolph/D.Arthur
Battier/Pietrus
Monta/T.Allen/X.Henry/Selby?
Conley/Monta/Vasquez

The Grizzlies finally land Monta and cut enough salary to re-sign Gasol and Battier.


Suns Trade: Gortat, Pietrus, VC
Receive: Gay, Mayo, Biedrins, minor GSW filler (if needed)

Biedrins/R.Lopez/Siler
Frye/Morris/Warrick/Lawal
Gay/Dudley/Chill
Mayo/Hill
Nash/Brooks

The Suns get younger and add more offensive fire power.


Warriors Trade: Monta, Biedrins, Admundson, C. Bell, minor filler (if required)
Receive: Gortat, VC - cut

Gortat/Udoh/vet min
D.Lee/Udoh/Tyler
Prince (signed)/D.Wright
JR Smith (signed)/Klay Thompson
S.Curry/Law/Lin

The Warriors land a very good C and a lot more salary flexibility in the offseason as VC only has $4 million guaranteed on his contract. This gives the Warriors so many options to improve the team through FA and taking on salary (and talent) in a trade.

Re: Official Offseason Thread 4.0

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 3:23 pm
by GrantHill
I don't like it. We won't have any flexibility for 2012 and we don't need another SF. We need a SG or PF. I like that Pietrus for Majo trade but I would rather keep Gortat instead of getting Gay and Biedrins.

Re: Official Offseason Thread 4.0

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:00 pm
by Beas4pres
i know everyone bashes every single trade. Check this one out

dudley, warrick, and lopez , and maybe even (possible future pick 2nd)

for

Bayless, Derozan, and Amir Johnson (possible picks as well)

i think this would be good for both teams. Only problem is we lose dudley.

positive for suns

they get a young back up PG/SG in Bayless who has played since h.s. with frye
our future backcourt can be Brooks and Bayless
we get rid of warrick contract, and lopez weak sauce

with this

pg- nash, brooks, bayless (we could even let brooks walk bayless in my opinion on suns would shine
sg- derozan, pietrus (as 6th man)
sf- hill, childress
pf- Johnson, morris (splitting minutes to see what is best)
c- Gortat, and frye (frye and bayless off the bench has offense explosion with defenders such as pietrus childress and morris)

this brings youth for the future and gives us a young scoring SG

toronto
they get a SG who has a bright future and a good team player in dudley
they get a PF as well who would be good on toronto
they also get a C who can play next to bargnani to open up the court


if you dont like dudley in this trade maybe throw in pietrus instead of him or even sign and trade brooks theree

Re: Official Offseason Thread 4.0

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:48 pm
by RunDogGun
I told myself not to ask the obvious troll questions, but.... you do know that Frye was born in 83 and Bayless was born in 88, right? If they did play in high school, it would mean that either Bayless skipped a grade, Frye flunked a grade or one was enrolled late or early. And even then, it would be a Sr to freshmen relationship.

Then, you did see them scrapping in last year's playoffs, right?

Meh, your trade ideas are terrible. As for the other trade, no thanks. We are not trading The Gortat, while taking on Rudy's contract and Beans.

Re: Official Offseason Thread 4.0

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 5:08 pm
by RunDogGun
Frye played with Justin Bayless while Jared was in sixth grade.

http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepubli ... -frye.html

Re: Official Offseason Thread 4.0

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 5:16 pm
by Beas4pres
they were at U of A and both went to St Marys H.S. my friend Josh Felton actually knows bayless and talks to him every week. That is similar and I am sure they are close

They know each other personally!

RUNDOGGUN

how is that trade bad? explain its your opinoin i want to hear

dudly, warrick, lopez
for
bayless, derozan, amir johnson


HOW IS THAT BAD

Re: Official Offseason Thread 4.0

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 5:21 pm
by Beas4pres
RUNDOGGUN

please meet up for a drink I would fight a lakers fan for your amusement, then i would make sure you never said anything on this site acting like your superior to everyone with an opinion.

Re: Official Offseason Thread 4.0

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 5:21 pm
by GrantHill
A trade is bad when the other team simply won't accept it.

Re: Official Offseason Thread 4.0

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 5:23 pm
by Beas4pres
why wouldnt the other team accept it grant hill

DUDLEY is a good player (heck you guys all love him and said he is untradeble then why wouldnt raptors want him)

Warrick is an upgrade to amir johnson and then it also puts a good bench veteran

Lopez is a center that Raptors need. he is not a score and can clog a lane leaving bargnani on the outside




WHY IS THIS BAD explain all you guys do is talk bad but have no explanation

YOUR WORD doesnt mean ish

Re: Official Offseason Thread 4.0

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 5:25 pm
by Beas4pres
and just for all you noobs

BEAS in my screen name is short for my last name BEASTY

Re: Official Offseason Thread 4.0

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 5:26 pm
by RunDogGun
Well if you mean "together" at UofA as Jerryd being a freshman in 2007, while Frye was drafted into the NBA in 2005, then yeah, they were together. :roll:

They have had a few altercations on the court. I don't think they like each other, making one of your points silly. Frank has already explained to you why your trades suck, so there is really no need to elaborate further until you change. :lol:

Re: Official Offseason Thread 4.0

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 5:28 pm
by GrantHill
I think the Suns would not do that trade. Raptors should add a 1st rounder and Ed Davis.

Re: Official Offseason Thread 4.0

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 5:31 pm
by Beas4pres
go read my thing above i never said TOGETHER. Go check it smart guy

basketball is a sport people get competitive and go all out

my friend fights UFC and he had to fight a teamate.

does that mean they hate each other cause they fought.

FRANK is not your body guard you explain. LAST I SAW THIS IS A NEW TRADE

message me rundoggun I want to talk to you and find out what your about.


DO YOU KNOW BAYLESS DO YOU KNOW FRYE. then dont act like you know there relationship

Re: Official Offseason Thread 4.0

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 5:33 pm
by Beas4pres
explain GRANT HILL why it wouldnt work. I made a trade and want to hear peoples opinions

you guys come on here and bash people but dont explain like your word actually means something!

it doesnt

Re: Official Offseason Thread 4.0

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 5:35 pm
by Beas4pres
your a Joke RUNDOGGUN

letting frank fight your battles and hiding in the back

typical guy with no life who can only have confrontation online not in person

Re: Official Offseason Thread 4.0

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 5:37 pm
by Beas4pres
if we can get a Demar Derozen for a future SG and to build while nash is here. our future will look bright!

Re: Official Offseason Thread 4.0

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 5:41 pm
by RunDogGun
In your crazy trade idea, you said," has played since high school with Frye.". Which isn't true. And who gives a f*ck if they played at the same school at completely different times. Hey let's get Bibby, he went to UofA. And then get Richard Jefferson.

As I have said before, you aren't smart enough for me to hang out with. I don't see you getting any smarter before you get to LA. Like Kerrsed said, you are an obvious troll. :lol:

Re: Official Offseason Thread 4.0

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 5:44 pm
by Safety Pickle
Beas4pres wrote:if we can get a Demar Derozen for a future SG and to build while nash is here. our future will look bright!


How about you go post that trade on the Raptors forum and see how they react. The you might understand why it has absolutely zero chance of happening. You do know that both teams have to agree to the trade, right?

Re: Official Offseason Thread 4.0

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 5:44 pm
by RunDogGun
Oh, so now you change your drink offer to a battle? You're ( not your) the joke son. :) Frank doesn't need to fight anything for me, just don't see the need to repeat. Maybe you do. :lol: