Earl Clark
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2014 3:45 am
Lol, waived by a team he was traded to. Told you guys years ago he was absolute garbage!
RealGM
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
Earl Clark
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=1305873
Page 1 of 1
Re: Earl Clark
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2014 3:58 am
Who?
Re: Earl Clark
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2014 4:05 am
Hunter?
Re: Earl Clark
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2014 4:32 am
Calvin Klein wrote:Hunter?
he returnsRe: Earl Clark
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2014 6:34 am
Who here said he would be good?
Re: Earl Clark
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2014 7:00 am
SF88 wrote:Who here said he would be good?
i know who, but i dont want to embarass him.
Re: Earl Clark
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2014 9:27 am
SDC wrote:SF88 wrote:Who here said he would be good?
i know who, but i dont want to embarass him.
Oh come on, who hasn't been wrong before? Spill it!
Re: Earl Clark
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2014 9:33 am
We could have had this
Instead we had this
Instead we had this
Re: Earl Clark
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2014 9:58 am
If it wasn't Clark, we were taking Jrue Holiday. Not James Johnson.
Re: Earl Clark
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:03 am
LV-Suns wrote:If it wasn't Clark, we were taking Jrue Holiday. Not James Johnson.
We wouldn't have taken Holliday cause the Suns thought they were going to have Curry til Donnie Nelson bailed out after the draft.
If the Suns knew that GSW was goin to keep Curry then yea the Suns would have drafted Holliday but at the time they didn't.
Re: Earl Clark
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2014 4:32 pm
hsraffety wrote:Lol, waived by a team he was traded to. Told you guys years ago he was absolute garbage!
You want a trophy? What's the point of this comment?
Everyone said he was garbage.
Re: Earl Clark
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2014 7:23 pm
Remember last year when he was putting up decent number for the Lakers? Laker fans were STOKED and some fans here thought we had overlooked his talents.
Does this remind you of a similar situation this year? *Cough*KendalMarshall*Cough*
Players put up deceiving offensive numbers on DAntoni teams. ESPECIALLY weak DAntoni teams.
Does this remind you of a similar situation this year? *Cough*KendalMarshall*Cough*
Players put up deceiving offensive numbers on DAntoni teams. ESPECIALLY weak DAntoni teams.
Re: Earl Clark
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2014 9:08 pm
Marshall actually looks good. I don't think he can lead victories though. Also, his defense will never work.
Re: Earl Clark
Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 3:27 am
Jdiddy701 wrote:Marshall actually looks good. I don't think he can lead victories though. Also, his defense will never work.
Yeah I agree. His big assist numbers are worthless. He has ZERO impact on the game. All those stats are meaningless numbers. Basically what you said, can't lead a team to victory.
Re: Earl Clark
Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 3:40 am
LukasBMW wrote:Remember last year when he was putting up decent number for the Lakers? Laker fans were STOKED and some fans here thought we had overlooked his talents.
Does this remind you of a similar situation this year? *Cough*KendalMarshall*Cough*
Players put up deceiving offensive numbers on DAntoni teams. ESPECIALLY weak DAntoni teams.
Oddly, it seems that D'Antoni doesn't even know that these guys can play that well, it usually takes a buttload of injuries, which force Mike to use them. But often, players who have skills, that are given a ton of minutes and a green light to shoot or create, they will, and they thrive.
As for James Johnson, I told people to keep an eye on him.
Re: Earl Clark
Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 11:21 pm
SDC wrote:SF88 wrote:Who here said he would be good?
i know who, but i dont want to embarass him.
I don't mind embarassing him:
viewtopic.php?f=27&t=1077681&start=30#p26101275
He called me a "damn moron!!!!!!!!!".