Post#302 » by MrMiyagi » Fri Apr 21, 2017 3:33 am
bwgood77 wrote:MrMiyagi wrote:Why not at the 9-14 teams to the 3-8 odds? So you'd have:
25.0% (Brooklyn)
19.9% (Phoenix)
17.3% (Los Angeles+Dallas)
13.0% (Philadelphia+New Orleans)
9.6% (Orlando+Charlotte)
6.0% (Minnesota+Detroit)
5.9% (New York+Denver)
3.3% (Sacramento+Miami)
That's easy to say for someone who drafted for the now and finished first. But how does that work if you follow the actual lottery? If anything it should follow the actual lottery. Not give the best teams better percentages. TASTIC left them out for zero chance. Now you are proposing far better than actual lottery chances for 9-14.
No I'm not, I'm suggesting a solution where we avoid the scenario where Dallas/New Orleans/Charlotte/Detroit/Denver/Miami gets a top 3 pick and none of the teams were assigned those odds. Right now there is a 5.4% chance unaccounted for. If Miami got 3rd, would we just skip that pick for the next one in the order?
EDIT: I made a typo in the original post: "at" was meant to be "add"
EDIT 2: I guess my system would screw up if say Charlotte and Orlando were to be vaulted into the #1 and #3 respectively and they were both assigned to Boomy Gym Leader in this scenario.
Suns traded Mikal Bridges, Cam Johnson, Jae Crowder and 4 1st round picks and a swap so some Vegas Bookies would like us.
Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. - Isaac Asimov
Let us sing when we can, and forget the rest. - H.P. Lovecraft