Page 1 of 1

Nashty & Cactus: Game 51 vs Bucks

Posted: Sun Feb 5, 2017 4:04 am
by batsmasher
Standings

How it works

OK, I'm going to change things up a touch. Instead of bumping and locking the threads for Games 46-50, I will instead be posting the results here. This thread will be edited later tonight.

Game 46 @ Denver
3. TJ
2. Booker
1. Knight

-3. Chandler
-2. Chriss
-1 Len

Game 47 vs Denver

3. Bledsoe
2. Booker
1. Chandler

-3. Knight
-2. Warren
-1. Len

Game 48 vs Memphis
3. Chriss
2. Tucker

-3. Bledsoe
-2. Knight
-1. Chandler


Game 49 vs LAC
3. Bled
2. Booker
1. Tucker

-3. Chriss
-1. TJ
-1. Knight

Game 50 @ SacTown
3. Booker
2. TJ
1. Bledsoe
1. PJ

Image

Re: Nashty & Cactus: Game 51 vs Bucks

Posted: Sun Feb 5, 2017 4:15 am
by RaisingArizona
+3 Booker
+2 Chriss
+1 Nobody

Re: Nashty & Cactus: Game 51 vs Bucks

Posted: Sun Feb 5, 2017 4:20 am
by kennydorglas
+3 Book
+2 Chriss
+1 Ohhh, Tucker?

-3 Bled
-3 Warren

Re: Nashty & Cactus: Game 51 vs Bucks

Posted: Sun Feb 5, 2017 4:22 am
by sleepyvato
+3 Booker
+3 Chriss

-3 Knight
-3 Tucker

Re: Nashty & Cactus: Game 51 vs Bucks

Posted: Sun Feb 5, 2017 4:28 am
by blacksun
+3 Booker
+2 Chriss
+1 Tucker

-2 Bled
-2 Warren
-2 Watson

Re: Nashty & Cactus: Game 51 vs Bucks

Posted: Sun Feb 5, 2017 7:54 am
by Qwigglez
+3 Booker
+3 Chriss

-2 Bledsoe
-2 Warren
-2 Knight

Re: Nashty & Cactus: Game 51 vs Bucks

Posted: Sun Feb 5, 2017 8:20 am
by batsmasher
sleepyvato wrote:+3 Booker
+3 Chriss

-3 Knight
-3 Tucker

Qwigglez wrote:+3 Booker
+3 Chriss

-2 Bledsoe
-2 Warren
-2 Knight

Honestly impressive how much you can hate on a dude that plays 7 minutes. Keep it up.

/grump

Re: Nashty & Cactus: Game 51 vs Bucks

Posted: Sun Feb 5, 2017 9:02 am
by Zelaznyrules
+3 Booker
+3 Chriss
-2 Warren
-2 Knight
-2 Kidd (for smirking every time the camera looked his way)

Re: Nashty & Cactus: Game 51 vs Bucks

Posted: Sun Feb 5, 2017 11:53 am
by Saberestar
+3 Booker
+2 Chriss
+1 Chandler

-3 Bledsoe
-1 Knight
-1 Len
-1 Warren

Re: Nashty & Cactus: Game 51 vs Bucks

Posted: Sun Feb 5, 2017 12:00 pm
by Saberestar
batsmasher wrote:
sleepyvato wrote:+3 Booker
+3 Chriss

-3 Knight
-3 Tucker

Qwigglez wrote:+3 Booker
+3 Chriss

-2 Bledsoe
-2 Warren
-2 Knight

Honestly impressive how much you can hate on a dude that plays 7 minutes. Keep it up.

/grump

It is not hate, it is common sense IMO. Knight (and Len too) plays so bad his few minutes on the court that Watson has no other option than sit him for the rest of the game.

Re: Nashty & Cactus: Game 51 vs Bucks

Posted: Sun Feb 5, 2017 12:50 pm
by batsmasher
Saberestar wrote:
batsmasher wrote:
sleepyvato wrote:+3 Booker
+3 Chriss

-3 Knight
-3 Tucker

Qwigglez wrote:+3 Booker
+3 Chriss

-2 Bledsoe
-2 Warren
-2 Knight

Honestly impressive how much you can hate on a dude that plays 7 minutes. Keep it up.

/grump

It is not hate, it is common sense IMO. Knight (and Len too) plays so bad his few minutes on the court that Watson has no other option than sit him for the rest of the game.

He literally played 7 minutes at a time we were down double digits. #commongrump

Re: Nashty & Cactus: Game 51 vs Bucks

Posted: Sun Feb 5, 2017 1:30 pm
by batsmasher
results now in the OP.

Re: Nashty & Cactus: Game 51 vs Bucks

Posted: Sun Feb 5, 2017 4:17 pm
by sleepyvato
batsmasher wrote:Honestly impressive how much you can hate on a dude that plays 7 minutes. Keep it up.

/grump


:lol:

Re: Nashty & Cactus: Game 51 vs Bucks

Posted: Sun Feb 5, 2017 5:44 pm
by NTB
Nice chart bats.

Re: Nashty & Cactus: Game 51 vs Bucks

Posted: Sun Feb 5, 2017 8:05 pm
by TheFire
+3 Booker
+2 Tucker
+1 Chriss

-3 Bledsoe
-2 Warren
-1 Len

Re: Nashty & Cactus: Game 51 vs Bucks

Posted: Sun Feb 5, 2017 8:31 pm
by Christine-In-AZ
batsmasher wrote:
Saberestar wrote:
batsmasher wrote:
Honestly impressive how much you can hate on a dude that plays 7 minutes. Keep it up.

/grump

It is not hate, it is common sense IMO. Knight (and Len too) plays so bad his few minutes on the court that Watson has no other option than sit him for the rest of the game.

He literally played 7 minutes at a time we were down double digits. #commongrump


and then there are some who refuse to ever give +points to a certain player due to a childish agenda

too late but..

+3 Book
+2 Chriss
+1 Chandler

Re: Nashty & Cactus: Game 51 vs Bucks

Posted: Mon Feb 6, 2017 1:03 am
by batsmasher
NTB wrote:Nice chart bats.

I've been doing em the whole time but I figure no one has been seeing them in the locked threads so this solution seems to be better.

Re: Nashty & Cactus: Game 51 vs Bucks

Posted: Mon Feb 6, 2017 1:10 am
by batsmasher
ChrisInAZ wrote:and then there are some who refuse to ever give +points to a certain player due to a childish agenda

too late but..

+3 Book
+2 Chriss
+1 Chandler

Fear not Chris, you aren't late! This is for the previous 5 games.

Since I'm doing 5 at a time now you can theoretically vote on games 51-55 till game 56 rolls around.

Re: Nashty & Cactus: Game 51 vs Bucks

Posted: Tue Feb 7, 2017 12:24 am
by bwgood77
+3 Chriss
+2 Tucker
+1 Booker - 5 TOs bad, but at least he shot well and contributed in other places

Bledsoe -3
Dudley -2
Len -1