Audi wrote:NavLDO wrote:hollywood6964 wrote:I wouldn't. Not big enough of a sample size. Guys like Jeremy Lin should point to that.
If he plays really well, n we're not in a position to draft a top pg; 8m a year, 3 yr deal, with an option at 12m for Elfred in the 4th..
You are totally ignoring his other 234 GS at PG?? Because it was not with our players? The dude has proven to be a worthy starting PG in the NBA. All-Star? Absolutely not. But this gives McD the comfort of TRULY going after BPA in the draft, IMO. He doesn't have to [i]force a PG pick early.[/i]
Aside from the fact that I am a fan of Payton and think it's absurd to trade him at 23 on a career season, THIS really hits on why I am most upset we traded him away for peanuts. I would have rather ORL been able to pick BPA and let Elfrid walk if it's a PG (if that's the route we wanted to go and he was asking too much).
Ironically, we are in the same situation as we were when we drafted him. We are in dire need of a PG and any team picking before us has the ability to draft our target and squeeze us for something extra ala Philly w/ Saric and Payton. Just dumb.
And we have 2 1st Rd picks, and HAD 4, now HAVE 3, 2nd Rd picks...was that ONE 2nd Rd pick going to be truly critical in any trade situation/pkg McD needed to put forth on Draft night? Is he really ever going to say "darn it, I really wish I had that 2nd Rd pick back instead of Payton." I'm thinking...no.
What I'm most disappointed about is that McD didn't turn one of Dudley, Chandler, or Knight + another 2nd or + Chriss for Biyombo...or whatever would be a fair trade...since we could really use a defensive, rebounding presence in the middle that isn't 35YO or leaving at the end of the season. That, too, would've given us even MORE flexibility in the draft, taken about $4M off your books , (Chandler + 2nd or Duds + Chriss + 2nd), or would've taken between $1.5-2.5M off your books per year, plus given you, at least, the comfort of having a former starting Combo Guard in Knight on your roster, and some flexibility in the draft.
And BTW, Trae Young just went 0 for 9 from beyond the arc for his 4th straight mediocre game. Chances are, IMO, he'll slide back, as he's already doing on all the draft sites, to a mid-Lotto-level prospect. If you want Young, and your are picking 4th like you are now, you'll be fine, I suspect.