LesGrossman wrote:Ghost of Kleine wrote:bwgood77 wrote:
Yeah, 33% from the field, and Oubre, despite the highlight plays that will make people think he is awesome, is shooting 38% overall and 30% from 3....on 10 shots from 3...those are all killers.
Started off well, but cooled off big time.
Can only expect Ayton, a 2nd year player who has played 94 games or so in the NBA. Will probably be our best player soon.
So would you tentatively, Or already outright say that Ayton is our primary franchise building block and Booker is our secondary? A strong secondary yes! But never the less, more of a number two level option to this point, As opposed to a first option?
None of this "number one/number two/number x option" would even be talked about on a winning team. Take the best shot, pass good for great shot, that is what this team needs. Less superstar attitude less stat padding or caring about all star snubs and such nonsense. Allow me to quote maybe the greatest coach ever:
"We believe in people executing their role and caring about the team more than anything individually."
That perspective is of course a perfectly fine one to have, And I do get where your coming from. But I'd have to disagree a bit on your point that it wouldn't be a point if discussion on " Winning" teams. I mean obviously, Every team has their " Go to" players and designated " team leaders " that can carry a team when the gameplan is not being executed optimally, Or the teams offense becomes stagnant at times throughout the game. But even aside from that,
For us specifically, and honestly as well as most every other team out there winning or not, The pecking order also plays a critical role in determining how and who for specific plays are created, Also it plays an important role in determining who is the most consistent and reliable options to look to in terms of production, etc. And how specific defensive assignments and " Gameplanning from opposing teams is usually constructed. Ideally, I would love your idea of a team playing specifically within the most efficient and logical offensive/ defensive available scheme. But it just seems with the fluidity and unpredictability of " in game" situations, That is just not a constant variable that can't always be depended on.
Also, It becomes more important for our young team with respect to determining specific roles/ capabilities for individual players on our team, As well as the necessary continuing evaluation of players in contractual situations that may/ will affect the teams short/ long term payroll considerations. And in determining who to retain or potentially trade in interest of roster upgrades and improvements. So, Again, it's just my personal perspective, But it's still an important team dynamic that needs to be considered.