King4Day wrote:If you have Insider, I highly recommend this article. They discuss adjustments you can expect Denver to make also.
In the buildup to a close NBA Coach of the Year race between Tom Thibodeau of the New York Knicks and Monty Williams of the Phoenix Suns, a narrative arose that seemed to favor Thibodeau -- who eventually won: The Knicks were a Thibodeau team, the Suns a Chris Paul team.
That felt unfair to New York's players and Phoenix's coaches. It was impossible to watch Phoenix's evisceration of the Denver Nuggets in Game 1 of their Western Conference semifinals on Monday and not appreciate the job Williams and his staff (and his players) have done crafting perhaps the league's most sophisticated pick-and-roll attack. It was painstaking work, requiring high-level synchronicity and total buy-in into some non-glamour aspects of NBA offense.
It began to click midseason, and then cascaded into an overpowering wave of pick-and-roll destruction as everyone found their sweet spots. After Feb. 15, Phoenix demolished opponents by 10.5 points per 100 possessions with Booker and Paul sharing the floor.
Every trick was on display in Phoenix's rollicking Game 1 win over a Nuggets team that was in theory well-prepared for the Suns' offense after facing a pick-and-roll attack aimed at Nikola Jokic in their first-round win over the Portland Trail Blazers. Denver should have been ready.
They weren't, and it was because of all the layers and wrinkles Phoenix has piled atop what was once a basic offense.
https://www.espn.com/nba/insider/story/_/id/31592965/how-chris-paul-phoenix-suns-flummoxing-nba-league-most-complex-pick-roll
I will read, and it reminds me of the discussion between D'Antoni and Nash.
I always felt D'Antoni deserved most of the credit there because Nash's game elevated to a new level...his stats were amplified under D'Antoni and typically a PG is past or near past his prime around that age...maybe beginning to decline some, and wasn't thought of nearly that level of player in Dallas.
With CP3 he has shown how much impact he has had on all sorts of teams, especially with OKC and Phx, and I do feel his specific impact unrelated to coaching was higher than Nash.
One reason was Monty was there the year before and on a 33 win pace prior to bubble, and bubble was obviously in our favor with our schedule of mostly playoff teams using bubble as kind of like preseason and like 5 of the teams missing all stars, with multiple teams missing multiple players or almost entire starting units (Miami, OKC, Philly)..Indy missing Sabonis and Dallas KP in one...Wizards missing Beal.
Ultimately we went from a 33 win pace with just Monty to a 58 in pace with CP3 and Monty (in a normal 82 season).
Now I know there were other changes like Crowder instead of Oubre which is an obvious upgrade though I know some may not think so, and adding Payne for a full season which has been great.
But the bubble also did seem to inflate some stats, particularly Saric's who was far better shooting than ever, playing many 3rd stringers since many 2nd stringers were starting, along with Carter and Payne.