Revived wrote:
This one’s cool too (and in the same tweet thread). Would’ve been nice if we got his legendary “BANG” but eh understandable since he’s working for NYK broadcast in this one.
Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22
Revived wrote:
Revived wrote:Slim Charless wrote:lilfishi22 wrote:Not saying at all that either Robinson or Williams is as good as Ayton, only that they are better value.
They're not better value when they're getting BBQ'd in the playoffs.
Ask Utah fans how they felt about Gobert's max deal after that LAC series....and he's a 3 time DPOTY.
Biyombo might be able to offer as much Ayton does in the playoffs. He has a somewhat decent looking floater from the FT area.
And he plays with enough energy to make up for some of the skill difference between Ayton and Biyombo.
I’d rather have Biyombo or Robinson on a 3 yr $18M deal than Ayton on a 4 yr $150M deal.
Ayton had a nice 9 game stretch in the playoffs. Great. Is that a one time fluke or can he repeat in the playoffs again? Remains to be seen.
But right now, after 72 games played in the regular season, Robert Sarver is looking like an absolute genius for not giving him the max that many were disappointed to see Ayton not get.
Ayton should’ve been averaging crazy numbers like 40 and 15 in these games without Booker or CP3. 25 and 10 in the games with just Booker. But he hasn’t been anywhere close to it.
lilfishi22 wrote:More than ever....we are in the championship or bust endgame
Revived wrote:Slim Charless wrote:lilfishi22 wrote:Not saying at all that either Robinson or Williams is as good as Ayton, only that they are better value.
They're not better value when they're getting BBQ'd in the playoffs.
Ask Utah fans how they felt about Gobert's max deal after that LAC series....and he's a 3 time DPOTY.
Biyombo might be able to offer as much Ayton does in the playoffs. He has a somewhat decent looking floater from the FT area.
And he plays with enough energy to make up for some of the skill difference between Ayton and Biyombo.
I’d rather have Biyombo or Robinson on a 3 yr $18M deal than Ayton on a 4 yr $150M deal.
Ayton had a nice 9 game stretch in the playoffs. Great. Is that a one time fluke or can he repeat in the playoffs again? Remains to be seen.
But right now, after 72 games played in the regular season, Robert Sarver is looking like an absolute genius for not giving him the max that many were disappointed to see Ayton not get.
Ayton should’ve been averaging crazy numbers like 40 and 15 in these games without Booker or CP3. 25 and 10 in the games with just Booker. But he hasn’t been anywhere close to it.
Revived wrote:Slim Charless wrote:lilfishi22 wrote:Not saying at all that either Robinson or Williams is as good as Ayton, only that they are better value.
They're not better value when they're getting BBQ'd in the playoffs.
Ask Utah fans how they felt about Gobert's max deal after that LAC series....and he's a 3 time DPOTY.
Biyombo might be able to offer as much Ayton does in the playoffs. He has a somewhat decent looking floater from the FT area.
And he plays with enough energy to make up for some of the skill difference between Ayton and Biyombo.
I’d rather have Biyombo or Robinson on a 3 yr $18M deal than Ayton on a 4 yr $150M deal.
Ayton had a nice 9 game stretch in the playoffs. Great. Is that a one time fluke or can he repeat in the playoffs again? Remains to be seen.
But right now, after 72 games played in the regular season, Robert Sarver is looking like an absolute genius for not giving him the max that many were disappointed to see Ayton not get.
Ayton should’ve been averaging crazy numbers like 40 and 15 in these games without Booker or CP3. 25 and 10 in the games with just Booker. But he hasn’t been anywhere close to it.
Slim Charless wrote:4th: Robert Sarver is not a genius....in anything....ever. If he tells you the sky is blue, then you should go look outside your window, just to make sure.
darealjuice wrote:I just look at centers like running backs in the NFL. If they aren't a top tier player like Joel Embiid or Nikola Jokic, you're better off spending that money elsewhere and filling the center rotation with veterans and young players with something to play for. There's only so much money to go around, and I think finding a way to use that money on our post-CP3 point guard makes more sense in today's game. I might feel different if we had a young point guard (like Haliburton) waiting to take over though.
Not denying Ayton's impact on the team, just not sure it stacks up to other players in that pay range.
lilfishi22 wrote:Therein lies a big issue. It's Year 4 and he's still completely reliant on others to create opportunities for him. CP3 has just done a HOF job of hiding this problem for the past two seasons.
SkyBill40 wrote:Slim Charless wrote:4th: Robert Sarver is not a genius....in anything....ever. If he tells you the sky is blue, then you should go look outside your window, just to make sure.
Uh.... he's a billionaire last I checked. That doesn't come without some pretty savvy skills and business moxie. Genius? No, clearly not; pretty damned smart where he needs to be? For sure.
Dude is a knob when it comes to hoops in general, but don't sell him short on being smart. If it were that easy, everyone would be a billionaire.
I think I need to vomit now as I can't believe I stuck up for ol' Bob $arver. Holy hell, I need some mouthwash.
bwgood77 wrote:lilfishi22 wrote:Therein lies a big issue. It's Year 4 and he's still completely reliant on others to create opportunities for him. CP3 has just done a HOF job of hiding this problem for the past two seasons.
He's shown he can create a lot more this year with his hook shot if he gets the ball in close range, even if well guarded. He could develop more. He also had some pretty big games last year in the playoffs when Paul was out. He had 44 pts on 76% shooting in games 1 and 2 against the Clips along with 23 rebounds. Just no chemistry at all with Payne right now with Payne in his first couple games back.
lilfishi22 wrote:More than ever....we are in the championship or bust endgame
Slim Charless wrote:Revived wrote:Slim Charless wrote:
They're not better value when they're getting BBQ'd in the playoffs.
Ask Utah fans how they felt about Gobert's max deal after that LAC series....and he's a 3 time DPOTY.
Biyombo might be able to offer as much Ayton does in the playoffs. He has a somewhat decent looking floater from the FT area.
And he plays with enough energy to make up for some of the skill difference between Ayton and Biyombo.
I’d rather have Biyombo or Robinson on a 3 yr $18M deal than Ayton on a 4 yr $150M deal.
Ayton had a nice 9 game stretch in the playoffs. Great. Is that a one time fluke or can he repeat in the playoffs again? Remains to be seen.
But right now, after 72 games played in the regular season, Robert Sarver is looking like an absolute genius for not giving him the max that many were disappointed to see Ayton not get.
Ayton should’ve been averaging crazy numbers like 40 and 15 in these games without Booker or CP3. 25 and 10 in the games with just Booker. But he hasn’t been anywhere close to it.
1st: Mitchell is getting wayyyyy more than 6/yr he's gonna get like 18 a year most likely.
2nd: Ayton can't pass the ball to himself so he can't very well average 40 a game if they don't feed him. He had 10 shots tonights and yes a few didn't go in so, they didn't go to him anymore.
3rd: His "nice 9 game stretch".....was actually historical-as in no one had that level of production with little shots. All while playing fantastic D.
4th: Robert Sarver is not a genius....in anything....ever. If he tells you the sky is blue, then you should go look outside your window, just to make sure.
bwgood77 wrote:SkyBill40 wrote:Slim Charless wrote:4th: Robert Sarver is not a genius....in anything....ever. If he tells you the sky is blue, then you should go look outside your window, just to make sure.
Uh.... he's a billionaire last I checked. That doesn't come without some pretty savvy skills and business moxie. Genius? No, clearly not; pretty damned smart where he needs to be? For sure.
Dude is a knob when it comes to hoops in general, but don't sell him short on being smart. If it were that easy, everyone would be a billionaire.
I think I need to vomit now as I can't believe I stuck up for ol' Bob $arver. Holy hell, I need some mouthwash.
He's not a billionaire. His net worth is like $800K, but probabaly almost all of that is Suns equity or Real Estate equity. Probably not too liquid.
Hopefully he makes a lot more money now on the team with gambling and a contender and all that, but I think he's still pretty cheap at heart. I think he has the same mentality as many here where he will see a stinker game here and there and refuse to pay him.
I mean he's refused to pay people for less (ie, Joe Johnson on an extension).
bwgood77 wrote:SkyBill40 wrote:Slim Charless wrote:4th: Robert Sarver is not a genius....in anything....ever. If he tells you the sky is blue, then you should go look outside your window, just to make sure.
Uh.... he's a billionaire last I checked. That doesn't come without some pretty savvy skills and business moxie. Genius? No, clearly not; pretty damned smart where he needs to be? For sure.
Dude is a knob when it comes to hoops in general, but don't sell him short on being smart. If it were that easy, everyone would be a billionaire.
I think I need to vomit now as I can't believe I stuck up for ol' Bob $arver. Holy hell, I need some mouthwash.
He's not a billionaire. His net worth is like $800K, but probabaly almost all of that is Suns equity or Real Estate equity. Probably not too liquid.
Hopefully he makes a lot more money now on the team with gambling and a contender and all that, but I think he's still pretty cheap at heart. I think he has the same mentality as many here where he will see a stinker game here and there and refuse to pay him.
I mean he's refused to pay people for less (ie, Joe Johnson on an extension).
Slim Charless wrote:bwgood77 wrote:SkyBill40 wrote:
Uh.... he's a billionaire last I checked. That doesn't come without some pretty savvy skills and business moxie. Genius? No, clearly not; pretty damned smart where he needs to be? For sure.
Dude is a knob when it comes to hoops in general, but don't sell him short on being smart. If it were that easy, everyone would be a billionaire.
I think I need to vomit now as I can't believe I stuck up for ol' Bob $arver. Holy hell, I need some mouthwash.
He's not a billionaire. His net worth is like $800K, but probabaly almost all of that is Suns equity or Real Estate equity. Probably not too liquid.
Hopefully he makes a lot more money now on the team with gambling and a contender and all that, but I think he's still pretty cheap at heart. I think he has the same mentality as many here where he will see a stinker game here and there and refuse to pay him.
I mean he's refused to pay people for less (ie, Joe Johnson on an extension).
Yup. He's 1 of the poorer NBA owners, by a fair amount too. He's no billionaire and I'd wager that CP3 might be closing in on him money wise. He's made over 500M not including endorsements. Booker's girlfriend also might be worth more. Her sister almost certainly can buy and sell $arver.
Either way, the money that he does have, I'm not even sure he earned it. Didn't his dad make the fortune and Booby was just the 1st born, so he got it all......?
Revived wrote:Slim Charless wrote:Revived wrote:Biyombo might be able to offer as much Ayton does in the playoffs. He has a somewhat decent looking floater from the FT area.
And he plays with enough energy to make up for some of the skill difference between Ayton and Biyombo.
I’d rather have Biyombo or Robinson on a 3 yr $18M deal than Ayton on a 4 yr $150M deal.
Ayton had a nice 9 game stretch in the playoffs. Great. Is that a one time fluke or can he repeat in the playoffs again? Remains to be seen.
But right now, after 72 games played in the regular season, Robert Sarver is looking like an absolute genius for not giving him the max that many were disappointed to see Ayton not get.
Ayton should’ve been averaging crazy numbers like 40 and 15 in these games without Booker or CP3. 25 and 10 in the games with just Booker. But he hasn’t been anywhere close to it.
1st: Mitchell is getting wayyyyy more than 6/yr he's gonna get like 18 a year most likely.
2nd: Ayton can't pass the ball to himself so he can't very well average 40 a game if they don't feed him. He had 10 shots tonights and yes a few didn't go in so, they didn't go to him anymore.
3rd: His "nice 9 game stretch".....was actually historical-as in no one had that level of production with little shots. All while playing fantastic D.
4th: Robert Sarver is not a genius....in anything....ever. If he tells you the sky is blue, then you should go look outside your window, just to make sure.
1st: I highly doubt that man. Robinson isn’t that highly regarded lol and most people have the opinion that bigs are becoming more and more obsolete in this game unless they can produce Embiid/Jokic type production. Bam Adebayo is a very good C for example and I’ve seen many people talk about how incredibly overpaid he is because he’s on a max contract too I think.
Robinson might get $10M/yr at most, anything more than that would surprise me.
2nd: I agree a bit but there are many instances where he gets the ball and he looks to pass without even thinking about shooting. He had a play in the Portland game where a 6’5 benchwarmer is the only one near him and he doesn’t even look at the rim and instead passes the ball eventually resulting in a turnover. Guys are gonna be more hesitant to pass him the ball when they know he’s just gonna pass it back to them, it’s wasting time. Only time he really goes up for a shot is the 2-3 times he establishes position in the paint or a lob.
This is the play I’m taking about:Spoiler:
3rd: I don’t disagree at all there. He was dominant in the playoffs and a major problem for other teams. But it was still like a 20 game stretch. If he can play like that again then sure yeah I’d say his up and down play in the reg season doesn’t matter.
4th: I edited and added James Jones in there since it seems like he wasn’t comfortable committing to Ayton without seeing another season either.
bwgood77 wrote:darealjuice wrote:I just look at centers like running backs in the NFL. If they aren't a top tier player like Joel Embiid or Nikola Jokic, you're better off spending that money elsewhere and filling the center rotation with veterans and young players with something to play for. There's only so much money to go around, and I think finding a way to use that money on our post-CP3 point guard makes more sense in today's game. I might feel different if we had a young point guard (like Haliburton) waiting to take over though.
Not denying Ayton's impact on the team, just not sure it stacks up to other players in that pay range.
I totally agree with this but I'd still have a hard time just letting him walk for nothing. I don't think if he got a max it would be viewed as a negative contract by all teams.