KdoubleDees23 wrote:Ghost of Kleine wrote:bwgood77 wrote:
Perhaps Jackson should have similarly fallen to 2nd round value.
Maybe?? But I don't think Jackson has ever had the scoring package or the big games that Bates has. Watch a few of his games, and you'll see that even though he still needs development, maturity/mentoring/ etc. He's still got elite star level outlier traits. Seeing as we'd be highly competitive over the next couple of years with Durant/ Booker/Ayton. We'd lose nothing really in getting a player like him on the cheap to stash in the G league for some seasoning and occasionally bring him in to work with Durant and Book to instill championship mentality/ perspective. He is still a young very fluid 6'10 wing with elite scoring package (shot making and confidence) too. We could do far worse in our current restrictive situation.
6'10 wings shouldn't be hitting shots like that, or be hitting big shots right in the defenders faces, or be able to dribble or move that well. It'd really be something to see Durant mentor him and potentially steal a high end talent in the mid to late 2nd round. Especially considering our lack of assets/ cap flexibility.
Dude plays for EMU !!!!!!!!!!! Jackson in the MAC would avg 30 ppg and have over .500 for his team. You want to compare, compare Bates at Memphis to Jackson. Jackson > Bates
I get your argument about weaker conferences, But honestly man, They're completely different players. Completely different skillsets! Bates, has elite offensive tools, and a very deep offensive versatile bag. Jackson was a versatile defensive wing prospect with elite athleticism that was overhyped into a top 5 pick. Currently though, Bates isn't at all overhyped at his current range ( mid to late 2nd round). If we're being honest, about the only similarities between the two that are wholly accurate are the maturity and development issues keeping them from being elite in the NBA. The value difference given their draft ranges increases the polarity between the two.
And as intriguing as Jackson was in college, he still wasn't an elite offensive talent, and unless I missed it somewhere, he's never put up big games comparable to what Bates has. Again, because the selling point on Jackson in college was as a POTENTIALLY elite versatile defender/ playmaker with some scoring ability and elite upside. If Bates somehow makes it into the top 5 discussion of the lottery based on POTENTIAL upside, then the argument might be more legitimate in terms of scalable value comparisons.
But even then, we'd need to see how Bates would adapt and contribute in a similar competitive nba level role to what Jackson played in the nba to determine proper value comparisons beyond mere hypothetical projections. For now given his elite skillset at a much lower cost, and still having elite upside value, I'd give the edge to Bates.