It appears they were hot all night.
This is crazy...the % and volume of 3s by the entire starting lineup....nuts. 26-41?

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez
bwgood77 wrote:Didn't see any of the Celtics/Knicks game but was a little surprised to see it was such a blowout. Looking at the box score I was surprised to see how few 3s the Knicks took. Seeing the Knicks outscored them so badly in the 1st figured they must have opened hot.
It appears they were hot all night.
This is crazy...the % and volume of 3s by the entire starting lineup....nuts. 26-41?
Bogyo wrote:bwgood77 wrote:Didn't see any of the Celtics/Knicks game but was a little surprised to see it was such a blowout. Looking at the box score I was surprised to see how few 3s the Knicks took. Seeing the Knicks outscored them so badly in the 1st figured they must have opened hot.
It appears they were hot all night.
This is crazy...the % and volume of 3s by the entire starting lineup....nuts. 26-41?
Yeah, this is where I'm a bit torn on the whole mass 3point shooting and it's math. I get it. I used to like it a lot, it brought a new wave, etc... I even want the Suns to shoot more really badly, and I get fuming mad and cuss the tv out when KD and Book nonchalantly middy the season away...
With that said, when a team takes 95 FGs and 61 (!!!!!!!!!!!) of them are 3s I'm not really sure what we are doing... ugly to watch too, its just drive-kick, drive-kick, drive-kick... not even whipping around or whatever, just drive-kick, drive-kick... yuck - and not a good product to watch in the longer term.
darealjuice wrote:Celtics are going to be juggernauts again, no surprise considering they kept things pretty intact this summer. The 3 point volume is crazy, but it’s also a lot of good looks in the flow of their offense, not just chucking **** up. Not going to shoot like that every night, but they won’t need to either.
Wolves will be interesting to watch this season. Not a fan of the fit for Ant, Randle, and Gobert at all, but it’s only one game. I wouldn’t be surprised if they took a little step back.
bwgood77 wrote:darealjuice wrote:Celtics are going to be juggernauts again, no surprise considering they kept things pretty intact this summer. The 3 point volume is crazy, but it’s also a lot of good looks in the flow of their offense, not just chucking **** up. Not going to shoot like that every night, but they won’t need to either.
Wolves will be interesting to watch this season. Not a fan of the fit for Ant, Randle, and Gobert at all, but it’s only one game. I wouldn’t be surprised if they took a little step back.
I think they will definitely take a step back. The Towns trade was not good. 21/8/3, with 42% from 3 on 5.3 3 pt attempts per game. He was perfect to spread the floor with Gobert in the middle and Ant driving. Then staggering C with Gobert.
The saving grace is Naz Reid also shot above 41% from 3 on 5 attempts per game. They need to start Reid and have Randle be like a 6th man. I didn't watch the game so maybe mostly they staggered Randle and Gobert as much as possible, but I agree, they are not the ideal fit together. Or play Naz Reid a lot with Randle, but I'd still probably start him for spacing. You can't have a frontcourt with two guys who can't hit the 3 along with a guard who is great at driving and finishing at the rim in today's NBA.
wheezy wrote:bwgood77 wrote:darealjuice wrote:Celtics are going to be juggernauts again, no surprise considering they kept things pretty intact this summer. The 3 point volume is crazy, but it’s also a lot of good looks in the flow of their offense, not just chucking **** up. Not going to shoot like that every night, but they won’t need to either.
Wolves will be interesting to watch this season. Not a fan of the fit for Ant, Randle, and Gobert at all, but it’s only one game. I wouldn’t be surprised if they took a little step back.
I think they will definitely take a step back. The Towns trade was not good. 21/8/3, with 42% from 3 on 5.3 3 pt attempts per game. He was perfect to spread the floor with Gobert in the middle and Ant driving. Then staggering C with Gobert.
The saving grace is Naz Reid also shot above 41% from 3 on 5 attempts per game. They need to start Reid and have Randle be like a 6th man. I didn't watch the game so maybe mostly they staggered Randle and Gobert as much as possible, but I agree, they are not the ideal fit together. Or play Naz Reid a lot with Randle, but I'd still probably start him for spacing. You can't have a frontcourt with two guys who can't hit the 3 along with a guard who is great at driving and finishing at the rim in today's NBA.
Yeah, every report I saw about the trade had the Wolves winning it ever so slightly, but I really don't like Randle's fit next to Gobert. He's basically the polar opposite on O and no better on D.
Qwigglez wrote:Rockets lost at home to the Hornets. Rockets were up 16 at one point.
Mulhollanddrive wrote:Nobody's beating OKC in the West.
They all have the same body type, drive quicker and defend longer than anyone else, built for the future 5 years.
Mulhollanddrive wrote:Nobody's beating OKC in the West.
They all have the same body type, drive quicker and defend longer than anyone else, built for the future 5 years.
Mulhollanddrive wrote:I reckon JJ Redick's going to lose the Lakers locker room sometime soon, he talks down to everyone not named LeBron