Page 1 of 6
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:49 am
by impulsenine
When we get confirmation of whether Grant's playing, I'm gonna ask everyone for their over/under on DJ's minutes.
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:56 am
by fuhgidabowdit
i think DJ should spell nash with or without hill in the lineup, i think he is a better point guard than leandro, if he can continue to get minutes than i feel real good about our chances, hes a great defender.
nash - DJ
bell - barbosa
hill - diaw
marion - diaw
amare - skinner
we suddenly are 9 deep, wow.
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:02 am
by Black Jesus 1
I'm pretty sure they said Hill will be playing Tuesday.
"This will be Hill's final game on the bench as he will return Tuesday." - Bender
I remember hearing those words out of him.
So, I'll guess 11 minutes out of DJ.
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:19 am
by Never Fear 33 Is Here
Woo Hoo, G Thrill is back for real this time.
Bye bye sky, hello BoBo.
GET SOME NUTS!!!
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:03 pm
by rsavaj
Amare dunking on Easy Yi FTW!!!
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:10 pm
by guaves13
I don't see where DJ's time is going to come from after GH comes back. MD wan'ts to keep Boris and LB around 30 and Skinner has earned an appearance. That and MD has commented about Raja playing better with more time. Maybe he will go to Skinner or DJ depending on the situation. Either way I think DJ has passed Banks for the token 9th rotation player. That is a start.
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:56 pm
by trwi7
You guys are going down. Bucks win this easily.
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:57 pm
by trwi7
Double post. It must have been so awesome that it needed to be posted twice.
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 5:56 pm
by rsavaj
I just hope Bogut doesn't score on Amare every trip on the floor, and I also hope that if he does, Amare returns the favor tenfold.
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:00 pm
by impulsenine
rsavaj wrote:I just hope Bogut doesn't score on Amare every trip on the floor, and I also hope that if he does, Amare returns the favor tenfold.
Since our pace factor is almost exactly 100 (which is fifth?!), that would mean that Bogut would score ~220 points... but Amare scoring that tenfold would be 220^10, or 57,916,253,396,531,250,000 per second, which is very roughly 5trillion times more points than have been scored by the entire NBA, ever. Per second.
I'd settle for Bogut getting 25 and Amare with 60 points, personally.
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:57 pm
by Sun Scorched
I hope Amare breaks Bogut's face.
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:19 pm
by Suns_Fever
I hope Bogut doesnt score 30 points on us this time. Lets come out and play defense like we did against the New Jersey Nets. I'm also excited to see how the second unit is going to play, will strawberry get more minutes tonight again?
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:11 am
by Never Fear 33 Is Here
impulsenine wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Since our pace factor is almost exactly 100 (which is fifth?!), that would mean that Bogut would score ~220 points... but Amare scoring that tenfold would be 220^10, or 57,916,253,396,531,250,000 per second, which is very roughly 5trillion times more points than have been scored by the entire NBA, ever. Per second.
I'd settle for Bogut getting 25 and Amare with 60 points, personally.
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:16 am
by Andrew34r
Sun Scorched wrote:I hope Amare breaks Bogut's face.
Might be the only way he stops him...Bogut is on a tear lately.
Anyway...Suns by 40.
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:37 am
by Shzm13
Bogut and Amare have beef.. There's always a ton of shoving between the two, so that'll be fun to see.. But tonight is Grant's night.
Suns by 90
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:40 am
by Black Jesus 1
Bucks suck, Suns are teh pwn.
Suns by 10, but knowing us this will be down to the wire, then Amare posters that scrub Bogut as time expires, Suns win.
-And yes I'm joking
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 1:11 am
by JustMoe
Gametime, Ladies - let's beat the Bucks senseless
GOOO SUNS!!!
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 1:13 am
by JustMoe
Damn, I just noticed I haven't seen Bogut with short hair before - my first thought was "Ugh, who's the ugly dude with the nasty goatee wearing #6?!"
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 1:15 am
by JustMoe
Nice block by STAT, but still a bad start for us
So, am I the only one around? Not that I would mind talking to myself, but still...
